Yogitha S. Yogesh
Yogitha S Yogesh is a legal content professional with over three years of specialized experience in demystifying the intricate world of taxation law. Her work has centered on translating complex fiscal regulations spanning direct and indirect tax, GST, and corporate compliance into clear, accessible content for diverse audiences. Her strength lies not just in accuracy, but in her ability to build a narrative around technical subjects, making them engaging and digestible. She had a robust academic foundation, including an LLM in Constitutional Law and a BA LLB from the prestigious Government Law College, Trivandrum.
![CESTAT Allows SSI exemption to Sabari Kitchen Service as per CBEC Circular [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/CESTAT-SSI-exemption-Sabari-Kitchen-Service-Kitchen-Service-CBEC-Circular-CBEC-Sabari-Kitchen-Service-as-per-CBEC-Circular-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT Allows SSI exemption to Sabari Kitchen Service as per CBEC Circular [Read Order]")
CESTAT Allows SSI exemption to Sabari Kitchen Service as per CBEC Circular [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Chennai bench of the Customs, Excise And Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) allowed the SSI exemption to Sabari Kitchen...
![Possession of Machinery Hypothecated Remains to Corporate Debtor in absence of Lease Deed By Third Party: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/NCLAT-NCLAT-Delhi-Corporate-Debtor-Taxscan.jpg "Possession of Machinery Hypothecated Remains to Corporate Debtor in absence of Lease Deed By Third Party: NCLAT [Read Order]")
![Income Tax Dept or GST dept cannot Retain Cash Seized Prior to Finalisation of Proceedings: Kerala HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/GST-I-income-Tax-Dept-Kerala-High-Court-GST-dept-Cash-Seized-TAXSCAN-1.jpg "Income Tax Dept or GST dept cannot Retain Cash Seized Prior to Finalisation of Proceedings: Kerala HC [Read Order]")
Non-Registration of “Charge” u/s 77 of Companies Act does not remove “Secured Creditor” Under IBC during CIRP: NCLAT [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), New Delhi held that a creditor may be considered a "Secured Creditor" under section 3(30) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) by...
![Non-Registration of “Charge” u/s 77 of Companies Act does not remove “Secured Creditor” Under IBC during CIRP: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/WhatsApp-Image-2025-02-20-at-10.40.51-AM.jpeg "Non-Registration of “Charge” u/s 77 of Companies Act does not remove “Secured Creditor” Under IBC during CIRP: NCLAT [Read Order]")
Any dispute even Pending Arbitration does not Prohibit Financial Creditors to avail remedy u/s 7 of IBC: NCLAT [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal ( NCLAT ) New Delhi has ruled that a financial creditor's ability to seek redress under Section 7 of the law is not in any way restricted by a dispute that...
![Any dispute even Pending Arbitration does not Prohibit Financial Creditors to avail remedy u/s 7 of IBC: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Pending-Arbitration-Prohibit-Financial-Creditors-Financial-Creditors-dispute-even-Pending-Arbitration-avail-remedy-section-7-of-IBC-IBC-taxscan.jpg "Any dispute even Pending Arbitration does not Prohibit Financial Creditors to avail remedy u/s 7 of IBC: NCLAT [Read Order]")
Failure to maintain record of goods received on subcontracting: CESTAT upholds Confiscation u/s 111 of Customs Act [Read Order]
The Allahabad bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) upheld the confiscation under section 111 of the Cutoms Act, 1962 as asseessee failed to maintain record...
![Failure to maintain record of goods received on subcontracting: CESTAT upholds Confiscation u/s 111 of Customs Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Failure-maintain-record-goods-subcontracting-CESTAT-Confiscation-111-of-Customs-Act-taxscan.jpg "Failure to maintain record of goods received on subcontracting: CESTAT upholds Confiscation u/s 111 of Customs Act [Read Order]")
Power to Arrest under PMLA: Punjab & Haryana HC rejects Bail Citing Prospective Applicability of Pankaj Bansal Verdict [Read Order]
The accused was arrested without providing written justification, and the Punjab and Haryana High Court denied him bail, citing the potential applicability of the Supreme Court's ruling in the Pankaj...
Madras HC Directs to Allow Refund of Wrongly Paid GST under RCM, treating it as supply of "service" [Read Order]
In a recent case, the High Court of Madras has directed to allow refund of wrongly paid Goods and service tax ( GST ) under the Reverse Charge Mechanism ( RCM ) treating it as supply of service. ...
![Madras HC Directs to Allow Refund of Wrongly Paid GST under RCM, treating it as supply of service [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Madras-High-Court-RCM-GST-taxscan.jpg "Madras HC Directs to Allow Refund of Wrongly Paid GST under RCM, treating it as supply of service [Read Order]")
![Debt of Related Party Cannot Assign to Refrian From Participating in CoC: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/NCLAT-CoC-National-Company-Law-Appellate-Tribunal-Corporate-Debtor-CIRP-Resolution-Professional-Section-21-Taxscan.jpg "Debt of Related Party Cannot Assign to Refrian From Participating in CoC: NCLAT [Read Order]")
Assessment of Two or More Bills of Entry or Shipping Bills Together is not Permissible: CESTAT [Read Order]
The New Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) has stated that two or more bills of entry or shipping bills cannot be taken together and assessed. The bench...
![Assessment of Two or More Bills of Entry or Shipping Bills Together is not Permissible: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/CESTAT-Bills-of-Entry-Shipping-Bills-taxscan.jpg "Assessment of Two or More Bills of Entry or Shipping Bills Together is not Permissible: CESTAT [Read Order]")