Yogitha S. Yogesh
Yogitha S Yogesh is a legal content professional with over three years of specialized experience in demystifying the intricate world of taxation law. Her work has centered on translating complex fiscal regulations spanning direct and indirect tax, GST, and corporate compliance into clear, accessible content for diverse audiences. Her strength lies not just in accuracy, but in her ability to build a narrative around technical subjects, making them engaging and digestible. She had a robust academic foundation, including an LLM in Constitutional Law and a BA LLB from the prestigious Government Law College, Trivandrum.
![Kerala HC sets aside Direction to Pay 20% Assessed Income Tax Considering the stay applications/condonation of delay applications [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Kerala-HC-Direction-to-Pay-Income-Tax-Income-Tax-Considering-applications-condonation-of-delay-applications-condonation-of-delay-taxscan.jpg "Kerala HC sets aside Direction to Pay 20% Assessed Income Tax Considering the stay applications/condonation of delay applications [Read Order]")
Kerala HC sets aside Direction to Pay 20% Assessed Income Tax Considering the stay applications/condonation of delay applications [Read Order]
The High Court of Kerala sets aside the direction to pay the 20% assessed Income Tax as the assessee made stay applications/condonation of delay...
![Undenatured Ethyl Alcohol not Excisable, Not Exempt under Rule 6(3) of CCR: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Undenatured-Ethyl-Alcohol-Exempt-under-Rule-63-of-CCR-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Undenatured Ethyl Alcohol not Excisable, Not Exempt under Rule 6(3) of CCR: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Excise Order against Liquidated Company is not sustainable: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Excise-Order-Liquidated-Company-sustainable-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Excise Order against Liquidated Company is not sustainable: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Delhi HC directs Customs, GST Department, DRI and DGGI to Properly Instruct Counsel Appearing on Advance Service [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Delhi-HC-GST-GST-Department-DRI-DGGI-instruct-counsel-Central-GST-Department-Delhi-High-Court-custom-duty-Customs-Department-Commissioner-of-Customs-Taxscan.jpg "Delhi HC directs Customs, GST Department, DRI and DGGI to Properly Instruct Counsel Appearing on Advance Service [Read Order]")
Income Tax Appeal Filed with Delay cannot be Disposed of Without considering Delay Petition: Kerala HC [Read Order]
The Kerala High Court in a recent case has held that an Income Tax appeal filed with a delay cannot be disposed of without considering a delay petition. Till a decision is taken on the stay petition,...
![Income Tax Appeal Filed with Delay cannot be Disposed of Without considering Delay Petition: Kerala HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Income-Tax-Appeal.jpg "Income Tax Appeal Filed with Delay cannot be Disposed of Without considering Delay Petition: Kerala HC [Read Order]")
Time Limit For Filing Refund Application Cannot Rejected Merely Because of Unauthorized Tax Collection: CESTAT [Read Order]
The New Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), the fact that the tax was collected illegally does not mean that the deadline for submitting a refund application...
![Time Limit For Filing Refund Application Cannot Rejected Merely Because of Unauthorized Tax Collection: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Tax-Refund.jpg "Time Limit For Filing Refund Application Cannot Rejected Merely Because of Unauthorized Tax Collection: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Govt Dues are below secured creditors, workmen, employees, and unsecured financial creditors u/s 53 of IBC: MCA MoS Harsh Malhotra at Lok Sabha
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs ( MCA ) has clarified, in a reply to a question raised at the Lok Sabha that as per Section 53 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, government dues are...
Fees Paid by Law Firm to use Name & Goodwill of Founder is Business Expense, Deductible u/s 37 of Income Tax Act: Delhi HC rules in Favour of Remfry & Sagar [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Delhi High Court has held that the fees paid by IPR law firm Remfry & Sagar to acquire the goodwill of the founder is a business expense and are deductible under Section 37...
![Fees Paid by Law Firm to use Name & Goodwill of Founder is Business Expense, Deductible u/s 37 of Income Tax Act: Delhi HC rules in Favour of Remfry & Sagar [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Remfry-Sagar-Delhi-High-Court-Income-Tax-Act-taxscan.jpg "Fees Paid by Law Firm to use Name & Goodwill of Founder is Business Expense, Deductible u/s 37 of Income Tax Act: Delhi HC rules in Favour of Remfry & Sagar [Read Order]")
Dept cannot Invoke Extended Period of Limitation merely because Returns were Self-Assessed: CESTAT [Read Order]
The New Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) has stated that the department cannot invoke the extended period of limitation merely because the returns were...
![Dept cannot Invoke Extended Period of Limitation merely because Returns were Self-Assessed: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/CESTAT-Self-Assessed-invoke-extended-period-taxscan.jpg "Dept cannot Invoke Extended Period of Limitation merely because Returns were Self-Assessed: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Failure to Notify Investment in Biocon Biologics u/s 6(2) of Competition Act: CCI Imposes ₹40 Lakh Penalty on Goldman Sachs [Read Order]
The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has penalized imposed ₹40 lakh penalty on Goldman Sachs for failure to notify investment in Biocon Biologics under Section 6(2) of the Competition Act,...
