Yogitha S. Yogesh
Yogitha S Yogesh is a legal content professional with over three years of specialized experience in demystifying the intricate world of taxation law. Her work has centered on translating complex fiscal regulations spanning direct and indirect tax, GST, and corporate compliance into clear, accessible content for diverse audiences. Her strength lies not just in accuracy, but in her ability to build a narrative around technical subjects, making them engaging and digestible. She had a robust academic foundation, including an LLM in Constitutional Law and a BA LLB from the prestigious Government Law College, Trivandrum.
![Withdrawal of Liquidation Application can be Accepted if CoC Permits RP to File Application for CIRP Time Extension: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/National-Company-Law-Appellate-Tribunal-NCLAT-CIRP-CoC-withdrawal-of-liquidation-application-IA-Director-of-the-corporate-debtor-liquidation-application-Taxscan.jpg "Withdrawal of Liquidation Application can be Accepted if CoC Permits RP to File Application for CIRP Time Extension: NCLAT [Read Order]")
Withdrawal of Liquidation Application can be Accepted if CoC Permits RP to File Application for CIRP Time Extension: NCLAT [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) New Delhi has held that when the CoC has already taken decision to file an application for...
![Non-Disclosure of Sensitive Information by DGGI for Search Operation not Amounts to Violation of Natural Justice Principles: Calcutta HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Calcutta-High-Court-DGGI-Natural-Justice-Principles-Natural-Justice-Taxscan.jpg "Non-Disclosure of Sensitive Information by DGGI for Search Operation not Amounts to Violation of Natural Justice Principles: Calcutta HC [Read Order]")
![Rejection of Application u/s 9 of IBC Against Hindustan Unilever Limited: NCLAT upholds Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/NCLAT-Upholds-Hindustan-Unilever-Limited-Unilever-Limited-Rejection-of-Application-NCLAT-Upholds-order-Upholds-order-National-Company-Law-Appellate-Tribunal-taxscan.jpg "Rejection of Application u/s 9 of IBC Against Hindustan Unilever Limited: NCLAT upholds Order [Read Order]")
![Service Tax Not Payable by Bharti Airtel on Free Allowance Given to Employees: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Service-Tax-Bharti-Airtel-CESTAT-Customs-Customs-Excise-and-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Chandigarh-Bench-of-CESTAT-Airtel-Employees-Services-Scheme-Call-Free-Allowance-Taxscan.jpg "Service Tax Not Payable by Bharti Airtel on Free Allowance Given to Employees: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Adjustment of Refund against Confirmed Demand During Pendency of Appeal is not Permissible: CESTAT [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Allahabad Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has observed that adjustment of refund against a confirmed demand during the pendency of an appeal...
![Adjustment of Refund against Confirmed Demand During Pendency of Appeal is not Permissible: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Adjustment-of-Refund-Refund-Demand-During-Pendency-Refund-Against-Confirmed-CESTAT-Confirmed-Demand-During-Pendency-of-Appeal-taxscan.jpg "Adjustment of Refund against Confirmed Demand During Pendency of Appeal is not Permissible: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Full Excise Duty not Demandable for Period of Non Operation of Machines: CESTAT rules in favour of Gutka Manufacturer [Read Order]
In a ruling in favour of Gutka Manufacturer, the Ahmedabad Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) has held that full excise duty cannot be demanded for the period when...
![Full Excise Duty not Demandable for Period of Non Operation of Machines: CESTAT rules in favour of Gutka Manufacturer [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/CESTAT-CESTAT-Ahmedabad-Gutka-Manufacturer-Excise-Duty-Non-Operation-of-Machines-taxscan.jpg "Full Excise Duty not Demandable for Period of Non Operation of Machines: CESTAT rules in favour of Gutka Manufacturer [Read Order]")
Import of Refrigerant Gas in Cylinder Requires Permission from Controller Of Explosive: CESTAT dismisses Appeal of CONCOR India [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) in a recent case has held that the import of refrigerant gas in cylinders requires permission from the controller of...
![Import of Refrigerant Gas in Cylinder Requires Permission from Controller Of Explosive: CESTAT dismisses Appeal of CONCOR India [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/CESTAT-CONCOR-India-CESTAT-dismisses-Appeal-of-CONCOR-India-Customs-Customs-Excise-and-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Delhi-Bench-of-CESTAT-New-Delhi-DRIs-examination-Taxscan.jpg "Import of Refrigerant Gas in Cylinder Requires Permission from Controller Of Explosive: CESTAT dismisses Appeal of CONCOR India [Read Order]")
“Premium” or “Salami” Value is Exigible to Service Tax under “Renting of Immovable Property”: CESTAT [Read Order]
As per the ruling of the Delhi Bench Of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), the value of "premium" or "salami" is subject to service tax under "renting of immovable...
![“Premium” or “Salami” Value is Exigible to Service Tax under “Renting of Immovable Property”: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/CESTAT-Delhi-CESTAT-Service-Tax-Renting-Of-Immovable-Property-Taxscan.jpg "“Premium” or “Salami” Value is Exigible to Service Tax under “Renting of Immovable Property”: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Appellate Authority can Condone Delay upto 30 Days as per Finance Act: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Appellate-Authority-Condone-Delay-Authority-Finance-Act-CESTAT-30-Days-as-per-Finance-Act-taxscan.jpg "Appellate Authority can Condone Delay upto 30 Days as per Finance Act: CESTAT [Read Order]")
SCN Demanding Service Tax on Alleged Wrongful Availment of Credit after Three Years is Not Valid: CESTAT [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Chennai Bench Of Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the action of the department in proposing and demanding service tax on alleged...
![SCN Demanding Service Tax on Alleged Wrongful Availment of Credit after Three Years is Not Valid: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/SCN-Service-Tax-Service-Tax-on-Alleged-Wrongful-Availment-CESTAT-Customs-Customs-Excise-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Central-Excise-Act-Chennai-Bench-Of-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg "SCN Demanding Service Tax on Alleged Wrongful Availment of Credit after Three Years is Not Valid: CESTAT [Read Order]")