Yogitha S. Yogesh
Yogitha S Yogesh is a legal content professional with over three years of specialized experience in demystifying the intricate world of taxation law. Her work has centered on translating complex fiscal regulations spanning direct and indirect tax, GST, and corporate compliance into clear, accessible content for diverse audiences. Her strength lies not just in accuracy, but in her ability to build a narrative around technical subjects, making them engaging and digestible. She had a robust academic foundation, including an LLM in Constitutional Law and a BA LLB from the prestigious Government Law College, Trivandrum.
![Appeal Delayed Beyond 15 Days Not Condonable as Per Proviso of Section 61(2) of IBC: NCLAT refuses to Condone 19 Days Delay by Kotak Mahindra [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Appeal-Delayed-Condonable-as-Per-Proviso-Per-Proviso-Section-612-of-IBC-IBC-NCLAT-NCLAT-refuses-NCLAT-refuses-to-Condone-Kotak-Mahindra-taxscan.jpg "Appeal Delayed Beyond 15 Days Not Condonable as Per Proviso of Section 61(2) of IBC: NCLAT refuses to Condone 19 Days Delay by Kotak Mahindra [Read Order]")
Appeal Delayed Beyond 15 Days Not Condonable as Per Proviso of Section 61(2) of IBC: NCLAT refuses to Condone 19 Days Delay by Kotak Mahindra [Read Order]
In a recent ruling , the New Delhi bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has held that delay in filing an appeal beyond 15...
![No Service Tax Payable by Standard Chartered Bank India on Allocation of General Administrative Expenses by Head Office: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/cestat-cestat-mumbai-Standard-Chartered-Bank-India-Taxscan.jpg "No Service Tax Payable by Standard Chartered Bank India on Allocation of General Administrative Expenses by Head Office: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Proceedings under Income Tax Act against Deceased Assessee Cannot be Continued against Legal Representative: Karnataka HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Income-Tax-Act-Income-Tax-Act-against-Deceased-Assessee-Deceased-Assessee-Legal-Representative-Karnataka-HC-Proceedings-under-Income-Tax-Act-taxscan.jpg "Proceedings under Income Tax Act against Deceased Assessee Cannot be Continued against Legal Representative: Karnataka HC [Read Order]")
![Pre-SCN Reply must be considered before Issuing GST SCN: Calcutta HC quashes Notice [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Calcutta-High-Court-GST-SCN-show-cause-notice-taxscan-1.jpg "Pre-SCN Reply must be considered before Issuing GST SCN: Calcutta HC quashes Notice [Read Order]")
Claim for liquidated damages require adjudication before Civil Court: NCLT dismisses Actor Akshay Kumar's Insolvency Petition [Read Order]
Recently the National Company Law Tribunal ( NCLT ), New Delhi bench in a recent case has dismissed petition filed by Bollywood actor Akshay Kumar, seeking initiation of insolvency proceedings...
![Claim for liquidated damages require adjudication before Civil Court: NCLT dismisses Actor Akshay Kumars Insolvency Petition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Claim-for-liquidated-damages-adjudication-Civil-Court-NCLT-Actor-Akshay-Kumars-Insolvency-Petition-taxscan.jpg "Claim for liquidated damages require adjudication before Civil Court: NCLT dismisses Actor Akshay Kumars Insolvency Petition [Read Order]")
![Moratorium period u/s 101 of IBC cannot be Extended Beyond 180 Days: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Moratorium-period-IBC-Extended-Beyond-180-Days-NCLAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Moratorium period u/s 101 of IBC cannot be Extended Beyond 180 Days: NCLAT [Read Order]")
Insolvency Application against Personal Guarantor is Maintainable u/s 60(1) of IBC even in Absence of Pending CIRP against CD: NCLAT [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal ( NCLAT ) bench in New Delhi has ruled that, even in cases where the National Company Law Tribunal ( NCLT ) has not yet started or is in the process of...
![Insolvency Application against Personal Guarantor is Maintainable u/s 60(1) of IBC even in Absence of Pending CIRP against CD: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Insolvency-Application-Personal-Guarantor-IBC-Absence-Pending-CIRP-CD-NCLAT-taxscan.jpg "Insolvency Application against Personal Guarantor is Maintainable u/s 60(1) of IBC even in Absence of Pending CIRP against CD: NCLAT [Read Order]")
![NCLAT Orders Meta to Pay Penalty; Stays Ban on WhatsApps Data-Sharing Policy [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/NCLAT-NCLAT-Orders-Meta-to-Pay-Penalty-Penalty-Ban-on-WhatsApps-WhatsApps-WhatsApps-Data-Sharing-Policy-Data-Sharing-Policy-taxscan.jpg "NCLAT Orders Meta to Pay Penalty; Stays Ban on WhatsApps Data-Sharing Policy [Read Order]")
Granting Approval u/s 80G(5)(vi) of Income Tax Act merely relying on instrument creating the trust is not valid: Punjab & Haryana HC [Read Order]
In a recent case, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana has held that granting approval under section 80g(5)(vi) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 merely relying on the instrument creating the trust is not...
![Granting Approval u/s 80G(5)(vi) of Income Tax Act merely relying on instrument creating the trust is not valid: Punjab & Haryana HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Punjab-Haryana-High-court-Income-Tax-Act-Granting-Approval-taxscan.jpg "Granting Approval u/s 80G(5)(vi) of Income Tax Act merely relying on instrument creating the trust is not valid: Punjab & Haryana HC [Read Order]")
![Services Rendered to Construction of Roads Were not Exigible to Service Tax: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Services-Rendered-Construction-of-Roads-Exigible-to-Service-Tax-Service-Tax-CESTAT-Construction-not-Exigible-to-Service-Tax-taxscan.jpg "Services Rendered to Construction of Roads Were not Exigible to Service Tax: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Penalty u/s 129 of GST Act not invokable merely on non disclosure of full details of supplier in e way bills: Calcutta HC [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Calcutta High Court held that penalty under section 129 of Goods and Service Tax ( GST ) Act, 2017 is not invokable merely on non-disclosure of full details of supplier in e way...
![Penalty u/s 129 of GST Act not invokable merely on non disclosure of full details of supplier in e way bills: Calcutta HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Calcutta-HC-Calcutta-High-Court-GST-section-129-of-Goods-and-Service-Tax-supplier-in-e-way-bills-penalty-taxscan.jpg "Penalty u/s 129 of GST Act not invokable merely on non disclosure of full details of supplier in e way bills: Calcutta HC [Read Order]")