Yogitha S. Yogesh
Yogitha S Yogesh is a legal content professional with over three years of specialized experience in demystifying the intricate world of taxation law. Her work has centered on translating complex fiscal regulations spanning direct and indirect tax, GST, and corporate compliance into clear, accessible content for diverse audiences. Her strength lies not just in accuracy, but in her ability to build a narrative around technical subjects, making them engaging and digestible. She had a robust academic foundation, including an LLM in Constitutional Law and a BA LLB from the prestigious Government Law College, Trivandrum.
![AO Insisting Importer Opting for Classification proposed by investigating agency is contrary to prescription of self-assessment S. 17 of Customs Act: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/CESTAT-Mumbai-Section-17-of-Customs-Act-AO-Insisting-Importer-Taxscan.jpg "AO Insisting Importer Opting for Classification proposed by investigating agency is contrary to prescription of self-assessment S. 17 of Customs Act: CESTAT [Read Order]")
AO Insisting Importer Opting for Classification proposed by investigating agency is contrary to prescription of self-assessment S. 17 of Customs Act: CESTAT [Read Order]
In a ruling by Mumbai bench of the Customs, Excise And Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), has held that Assesssing Officer (AO) insisting...
![CESTAT restores Suspended License of CHA in absence of Proof for Violation of CBLR [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/CESTAT-CESTAT-Chennai-Violation-CBLR-Taxscan.jpg "CESTAT restores Suspended License of CHA in absence of Proof for Violation of CBLR [Read Order]")
![Service Tax not applicable on extraction of Iron Ore from leased mines: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Service-Tadax-leased-mines-CESTAT-Bangalore-Section-65-Tax-not-applicable-extraction-of-Iron-Ore-taxscan.jpg "Service Tax not applicable on extraction of Iron Ore from leased mines: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![ECOs paying Tax u/s 9(5) of CGST Act are Not required to reverse ITC in respect of supply of restaurant services: CBIC Clarifies [Read Circular]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/CGST-restaurant-services-CBIC-ECOs-paying-Tax-Taxscan.jpg "ECOs paying Tax u/s 9(5) of CGST Act are Not required to reverse ITC in respect of supply of restaurant services: CBIC Clarifies [Read Circular]")
Claim under IBC will not survive when Unit Holders Handed Over Possession and Conveyance Deed has Been Executed: NCLAT [Read Order]
The New Delhi bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has held that when a unit holder is handed over possession and a Conveyance Deed has also been executed, no claim survives...
Satara Medical Admissions Scam: PMLA court refuses Grant bail to Head of Shri Chhatrapati Shivaji Education Society
A special Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) court refused to grant bail to the plea filed by Mahadev Deshmukh, the president of Shri Chhatrapati Shivaji Education Society in Satara, who was...
No Service Tax Leviable on Discounts Received from Manufacturer & Passed on to Customers During Car Sale: CESTAT [Read Order]
The New Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has ruled that service tax is not leviable on discounts and incentives received from manufacturers and passed on to...
![No Service Tax Leviable on Discounts Received from Manufacturer & Passed on to Customers During Car Sale: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/CESTAT-Service-Tax-Leviable-Discounts-Received-from-Manufacturer-Service-Tax-No-Service-Tax-Leviable-Tax-Leviable-taxscan.jpg "No Service Tax Leviable on Discounts Received from Manufacturer & Passed on to Customers During Car Sale: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Spent Catalyst removed as by-product from factory not a manufactured product, Excise duty not Demandable: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) has held that excise duty is not demandable as spent catalyst removed as a by-product from the factory is not a...
![Spent Catalyst removed as by-product from factory not a manufactured product, Excise duty not Demandable: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Spent-Catalyst-by-product-Excise-duty-Not-Demandable-taxscan.jpg "Spent Catalyst removed as by-product from factory not a manufactured product, Excise duty not Demandable: CESTAT [Read Order]")
CBLR violation in handling Shipping Bill: CESTAT relieves Charges against Customs Broker considering Forfeiture of Security Deposit [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) relieved all charges against the customs broker for the misdeclaration of goods in shipping bills, considering...
![CBLR violation in handling Shipping Bill: CESTAT relieves Charges against Customs Broker considering Forfeiture of Security Deposit [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/CBLR-violation-Handling-Shipping-Bill-Customs-Broker-Taxscan.jpg "CBLR violation in handling Shipping Bill: CESTAT relieves Charges against Customs Broker considering Forfeiture of Security Deposit [Read Order]")
Decree Holder falls under Definition of “Financial Creditor” under IBC: NCLAT allows Appeal [Read Order]
The New Delhi bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal ( NCLAT ) has ruled that if a decree is founded on a financial debt, the holder of the decree is considered a "Financial Creditor"...
