SEBI Notifies Multiple Amendments to ‘Certification Of Associated Persons In The Securities Markets Regulations, 2025’
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has issued a notification introducing significant amendments to the SEBI (Certification of...
![NCLAT Declines to Interfere in Liquidator’s Appeal, Urges Swift Disposal of Auction Dispute [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/18/2065050-2054263-liquidator.webp "NCLAT Declines to Interfere in Liquidator’s Appeal, Urges Swift Disposal of Auction Dispute [Read Order]")
![S.95 IBC Plea Found Within Limitation Due to Debt Acknowledgment: Supreme Court Upholds NCLAT Ruling [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/18/2065163-section-s95-ibc-ibc-plea-found-within-limitation-due-limitation-due-plea-found-taxscan.webp "S.95 IBC Plea Found Within Limitation Due to Debt Acknowledgment: Supreme Court Upholds NCLAT Ruling [Read Order]")
![NCLAT Rejects Duplicate Claim by noting that Appellant Cannot Assert Same Debt in Two Proceedings Without Invocation or Disclosure [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/14/2063800-nclat-nclat-rejects-duplicate-claim-duplicate-claim-duplicate-claim-by-noting-that-appellant-taxscan.webp "NCLAT Rejects Duplicate Claim by noting that Appellant Cannot Assert Same Debt in Two Proceedings Without Invocation or Disclosure [Read Order]")
MCA imposes Penalty on Company and Its Officers for Not Maintaining Registered Address Mandated u/s 12 of Companies Act [Read Order]
In a recent order, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs ( MCA ) has imposed penalties on Nandaka Information Services Private Limited and its officers for failure to maintain a registered office as...
![MCA imposes Penalty on Company and Its Officers for Not Maintaining Registered Address Mandated u/s 12 of Companies Act [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/17/2064595-mca-penalty-office-taxscan.webp "MCA imposes Penalty on Company and Its Officers for Not Maintaining Registered Address Mandated u/s 12 of Companies Act [Read Order]")
Unregistered Investment Advisory Services Misled Investors: SEBI Orders Refund of ₹2.79 Cr [Read Order]
The Securities and Exchange Board of India ( SEBI ) ordered a refund of ₹2.79 crore collected from investors by Market Gainer ( MG ) and Star Infotech IT Solutions (SIITS), both proprietary firms of...
![Unregistered Investment Advisory Services Misled Investors: SEBI Orders Refund of ₹2.79 Cr [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/15/2063936-sebi-refund-taxscan.webp "Unregistered Investment Advisory Services Misled Investors: SEBI Orders Refund of ₹2.79 Cr [Read Order]")
NCLAT Rejects Financial Creditor Claim as No Valid Guarantee Was Executed or Invoked Under IBC [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) held that the appellant failed to prove that a valid and binding corporate guarantee was executed by the corporate debtor and...
![NCLAT Rejects Financial Creditor Claim as No Valid Guarantee Was Executed or Invoked Under IBC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/14/2063738-nclat-ibc-financial-creditor-taxscan.webp "NCLAT Rejects Financial Creditor Claim as No Valid Guarantee Was Executed or Invoked Under IBC [Read Order]")
NCLAT Rejects Appellant’s Corporate Guarantee Claim as Time-Barred, Holds 388-Day Delay Violates IBC S.12 [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) rejected the appellant’s corporate guarantee claim as time-barred and held that the 388-day delay violates the provisions of...
![NCLAT Rejects Appellant’s Corporate Guarantee Claim as Time-Barred, Holds 388-Day Delay Violates IBC S.12 [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/14/2063724-no-appeal-under-section-61-filed-against-an-order-nclat-not-covered-by-part-ii-of-i-b-code-part-ii-of-i-b-code-taxscan-2.webp "NCLAT Rejects Appellant’s Corporate Guarantee Claim as Time-Barred, Holds 388-Day Delay Violates IBC S.12 [Read Order]")
Default occurred beyond outer limit of S.10A of IBC, Insolvency Application can be files Afresh: NCLAT [Read Order]
The New Delhi bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has held that when a default occurs beyond outer limit of Section 10A of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 (‘IBC’), a...
![Default occurred beyond outer limit of S.10A of IBC, Insolvency Application can be files Afresh: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/14/2063622-no-appeal-under-section-61-filed-against-an-order-nclat-not-covered-by-part-ii-of-i-b-code-part-ii-of-i-b-code-taxscan-1.webp "Default occurred beyond outer limit of S.10A of IBC, Insolvency Application can be files Afresh: NCLAT [Read Order]")