![NCLAT Sets Aside CIRP Admission, Citing Pre-Existing Dispute Evident in Email Exchanges [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/NCLAT-NCLAT-Sets-Aside-CIRP-Admission-CIRP-Admission-taxscan.jpg "NCLAT Sets Aside CIRP Admission, Citing Pre-Existing Dispute Evident in Email Exchanges [Read Order]")
NCLAT Sets Aside CIRP Admission, Citing Pre-Existing Dispute Evident in Email Exchanges [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has set aside the admission of a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) initiated against...
![NCLAT Dismisses Appeal Against Auction, Citing Delay and Finality of Sale Process [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/NCLAT-NCLAT-Dismisses-Appeal-Appeal-Against-Auction-taxscan.jpg "NCLAT Dismisses Appeal Against Auction, Citing Delay and Finality of Sale Process [Read Order]")
![Operational Creditor cannot initiate Insolvency Proceedings When Complaints Regarding Defects Remain Unresolved: NCLT rules against Schneider Electric India Pvt. Ltd. [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Schneider-Electric-India-Pvt.-Ltd-.jpg "Operational Creditor cannot initiate Insolvency Proceedings When Complaints Regarding Defects Remain Unresolved: NCLT rules against Schneider Electric India Pvt. Ltd. [Read Order]")
![Payment Made on Specific Invoice not adjustable Against Back-Dated Invoices: NCLTÂ rejects petition filed u/s 9 of IBC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Corporate-debto-r-taxscan.jpg "Payment Made on Specific Invoice not adjustable Against Back-Dated Invoices: NCLTÂ rejects petition filed u/s 9 of IBC [Read Order]")
![DRT Order Setting aside NPA Classification Does not Negate Existence of Financial Debt: NCLT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/DRT-NPA-Classification-NCLT-TAXSCAN.jpg "DRT Order Setting aside NPA Classification Does not Negate Existence of Financial Debt: NCLT [Read Order]")
![Non-Examination of Matter on Merits: NCLAT upholds Recall and Adjudication by NCLT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/NCLAT-NCLAT-upholds-Recall-and-Adjudication-by-NCLT-taxscan.jpg "Non-Examination of Matter on Merits: NCLAT upholds Recall and Adjudication by NCLT [Read Order]")
Non-Appointment of Woman Director u/s 149(1) of Companies Act: Recent Judicial Trends and MCA Crackdowns [Read Order]
While going through the several adjudication orders that have been passed by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) Registrar of Companies under Section 454 of the Companies Act, 2013, we can see...
![Non-Appointment of Woman Director u/s 149(1) of Companies Act: Recent Judicial Trends and MCA Crackdowns [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Annual-Returns-MCA-Non-filing-taxscan.jpg "Non-Appointment of Woman Director u/s 149(1) of Companies Act: Recent Judicial Trends and MCA Crackdowns [Read Order]")
Income Tax Dept cannot be a Secured Creditor in Liquidation Proceedings: NCLT Disposes Canara Bank’s Application [Read Order]
The National Company Law Tribunal, Chennai bench, disposed of the application filed by the Canara Bank of India under Section 60(5) of the IBC and held that the income tax department's claim cannot...
![Income Tax Dept cannot be a Secured Creditor in Liquidation Proceedings: NCLT Disposes Canara Bank’s Application [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Canara-Banks-Application.jpg "Income Tax Dept cannot be a Secured Creditor in Liquidation Proceedings: NCLT Disposes Canara Bank’s Application [Read Order]")
Non-Disclosure of Related Party Transactions in Board Report violates S. 134(3)(h): MCA Imposes ₹4 Lakh Penalty [Read Order]
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs ( MCA ) has imposed a monetary penalty of ₹4,00,000 on BI Minning (India) Private Limited and its directors in default for failing to disclose particulars of related...
![Non-Disclosure of Related Party Transactions in Board Report violates S. 134(3)(h): MCA Imposes ₹4 Lakh Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/MCA-site-img-1.jpg "Non-Disclosure of Related Party Transactions in Board Report violates S. 134(3)(h): MCA Imposes ₹4 Lakh Penalty [Read Order]")
Failure to Affix CIN in Company's Board Report Submitted through E-form 23AC and 23ACA: MCA Fines Company and Directors ₹6,000 [Read Order]
In a recent adjudication order, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) imposed a cumulative penalty of ₹6,000 on Private Limited company and its two directors for violating Section 12(3)(c) of the...
![Failure to Affix CIN in Companys Board Report Submitted through E-form 23AC and 23ACA: MCA Fines Company and Directors ₹6,000 [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/MCA-MGT-3-CA-CS-CMA-taxscan.jpg-1.webp "Failure to Affix CIN in Companys Board Report Submitted through E-form 23AC and 23ACA: MCA Fines Company and Directors ₹6,000 [Read Order]")
UAE Clarifies Corporate Tax on Exempted-REITs: Investors to Be Taxed on 80% of Property Income from 2025, Subject to Conditions
The UAE’s Federal Tax Authority ( FTA ) has issued a public clarification stating the corporate tax treatment for investors in Real Estate Investment Trusts ( REITs ) that are exempt from corporate...
