![AAR rejects Rice Exporter’s Application on Packaged Rice citing Ongoing GST Audits [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/15/500x300_2087678-aar-rice-exporters-application-packaged-rice-gst-audits-taxscan.webp "AAR rejects Rice Exporter’s Application on Packaged Rice citing Ongoing GST Audits [Read Order]")
AAR rejects Rice Exporter’s Application on Packaged Rice citing Ongoing GST Audits [Read Order]
The Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR), Andhra Pradesh Bench rejected an application seeking clarity on the GST liability for exports of pre-packaged...
![Inability to Amend Pending Export Invoices due to GST-ICEGATE Portal Mismatch: Gujarat HC Directs Customs to Re-verify [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/15/250x150_2087649-export-invoices-gst-icegate-portal-mismatch-gujarat-hc-customs-re-verify-taxscan.webp "Inability to Amend Pending Export Invoices due to GST-ICEGATE Portal Mismatch: Gujarat HC Directs Customs to Re-verify [Read Order]")
![Delhi HC Permits GST Dept. to Examine Advocate’s Seized CPU Under Strict Conditions, Protects Attorney-Client Privilege [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/15/250x150_2087586-delhi-hc-gst-attorney-client-privilege-taxscan.webp "Delhi HC Permits GST Dept. to Examine Advocate’s Seized CPU Under Strict Conditions, Protects Attorney-Client Privilege [Read Order]")
![ITC cannot Be Denied Merely Because Supplier’s Suppliers Defaulted: Allahabad HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/15/250x150_2087518-delhi-high-court-gst-itc-input-tax-credit-taxscan-1.webp "ITC cannot Be Denied Merely Because Supplier’s Suppliers Defaulted: Allahabad HC [Read Order]")
GST Portal SCN Glitch: Delhi HC Sets Aside ₹3.16 Crore Demand, Allows PSU to File Reply and Attend Personal Hearing [Read Order]
The High Court of Delhi, set aside a ₹3.16 crore GST demand against a Public Sector Undertaking ( PSU ), allowing it to file a reply and attend a personal hearing after noting that the Show Cause...
![GST Portal SCN Glitch: Delhi HC Sets Aside ₹3.16 Crore Demand, Allows PSU to File Reply and Attend Personal Hearing [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/15/500x300_2087394-gst-portal-scn-delhi-hc-taxscan.webp "GST Portal SCN Glitch: Delhi HC Sets Aside ₹3.16 Crore Demand, Allows PSU to File Reply and Attend Personal Hearing [Read Order]")
![CBIC Issues Clarification on GST Treatment of Secondary & Post-Sale Discounts [Read Circular]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/13/500x300_2086373-cbic-issues-clarification-on-gst-treatment-taxscan.webp "CBIC Issues Clarification on GST Treatment of Secondary & Post-Sale Discounts [Read Circular]")
Procter & Gamble Not Liable to Pay 18% Interest on Profiteered Amount as it Happened in 2018: GSTAT [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Delhi Bench of the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal held that Procter & Gamble is not liable to pay 18% interest on the profiteered amount since the profiteering...
![Procter & Gamble Not Liable to Pay 18% Interest on Profiteered Amount as it Happened in 2018: GSTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/12/500x300_2085966-gstat-procter-gamble-not-liable-taxscan.webp "Procter & Gamble Not Liable to Pay 18% Interest on Profiteered Amount as it Happened in 2018: GSTAT [Read Order]")
GSTR-9 cannot be Filed after 3 Years from Due Date to File Returns: Madras HC Dismisses Challenge against Late Fee [Read Order]
The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court recently dismissed a writ petition filed by a trader challenging an order imposing late fee for failure to file the annual return in Form GSTR-9 for the...
![GSTR-9 cannot be Filed after 3 Years from Due Date to File Returns: Madras HC Dismisses Challenge against Late Fee [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/12/500x300_2085918-gstr-9-due-date-to-file-returns-madras-hc-file-returns-taxscan.webp "GSTR-9 cannot be Filed after 3 Years from Due Date to File Returns: Madras HC Dismisses Challenge against Late Fee [Read Order]")
SCNs, Appeals and Non-Finalised Orders under Repealed GST Rules 89(4B) & 96(10) Cannot Survive after its Omission: Bombay HC [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court has ruled that after the omission of the Rules 89(4B) and 96(10) of GST ( Goods and Services tax), the pending proceedings, in the absence of any saving clauses or the benefit...
![SCNs, Appeals and Non-Finalised Orders under Repealed GST Rules 89(4B) & 96(10) Cannot Survive after its Omission: Bombay HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/12/500x300_2085862-scn-appeals-and-non-finalised-orders-gst-rules-taxscan.webp "SCNs, Appeals and Non-Finalised Orders under Repealed GST Rules 89(4B) & 96(10) Cannot Survive after its Omission: Bombay HC [Read Order]")