GST Penalty u/s 122 imposed for Fake Invoice Issuance: Madras HC directs to file Reply on 25% deposit, Quashes Penalty Order
The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court quashed a penalty imposed under Section 122 of the GST ( Goods and Services Tax ), with regards to the...
![Time Extension by Supreme Court During COVID Meant for Litigants, Not Authorities: Andhra Pradesh HC quashes GST Revisional Order [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/26/2080610-gst-revisional-order-taxscan.webp "Time Extension by Supreme Court During COVID Meant for Litigants, Not Authorities: Andhra Pradesh HC quashes GST Revisional Order [Read Order]")
![Sikkim HC Quashes GST Order Denying Budgetary Support of Rs. 59L to Zydus Wellness [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/25/2080329-zydus-wellness-gst-heinz-ip-taxscan.webp "Sikkim HC Quashes GST Order Denying Budgetary Support of Rs. 59L to Zydus Wellness [Read Order]")
Duplicate GST Demand u/s 63 and 73 Issued for Same Period: Orissa HC declares writ Infructuous as Order Rectified to ‘Nil’ by Dept [Read Order]
The Orissa High Court has declared a writ petition challenging a duplicate GST (Goods and Services Tax) demand as infructuous after the authorities rectified the disputed order and reduced the...
![Duplicate GST Demand u/s 63 and 73 Issued for Same Period: Orissa HC declares writ Infructuous as Order Rectified to ‘Nil’ by Dept [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/25/2080331-gst-demand-.webp "Duplicate GST Demand u/s 63 and 73 Issued for Same Period: Orissa HC declares writ Infructuous as Order Rectified to ‘Nil’ by Dept [Read Order]")
S. 69 and 70 under GST is not Violative of Article 20(3) or 21, Parliament Competent to Enact such Provisions: Delhi HC follows SC Ruling [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court has dismissed challenges questioning the constitutional validity of Sections 69 and 70 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ( CGST Act ) ruling that the parliament...
![S. 69 and 70 under GST is not Violative of Article 20(3) or 21, Parliament Competent to Enact such Provisions: Delhi HC follows SC Ruling [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/25/2080294-gst-is-not-violative-article-203-or-21-parliament-competent-enact-such-provisions-delhi-hc-sc-ruling-taxscan.webp "S. 69 and 70 under GST is not Violative of Article 20(3) or 21, Parliament Competent to Enact such Provisions: Delhi HC follows SC Ruling [Read Order]")
GST Rectification Order must be Passed by Same Authority that passed Original Order: Delhi HC [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court has clarified that rectification of a GST (Goods and Services Tax) order must be carried out by the same authority that passed the original order. A petition was filed by...
![GST Rectification Order must be Passed by Same Authority that passed Original Order: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/25/2080272-rectification-order.webp "GST Rectification Order must be Passed by Same Authority that passed Original Order: Delhi HC [Read Order]")
GST authorities unaware of Death of Assessee as Heir Continued to File Returns in Deceased’s Name: Gauhati HC order Fresh Proceedings against Legal Rep [Read Order]
The Gauhati High Court has quashed a GST (Goods and Services Tax) demand order issued in the name of a deceased assessee, holding that proceedings against a dead person are a nullity in law. At the...
![GST authorities unaware of Death of Assessee as Heir Continued to File Returns in Deceased’s Name: Gauhati HC order Fresh Proceedings against Legal Rep [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/25/2080261-gst-demand-order.webp "GST authorities unaware of Death of Assessee as Heir Continued to File Returns in Deceased’s Name: Gauhati HC order Fresh Proceedings against Legal Rep [Read Order]")
Taxpayer Pursued Rectification Petition First: Madras HC Condones 108 Days Delay in Filing Appeal [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court condoned a delay of 108 days in filing an appeal under the TNGST Act, 2017, after observing that the taxpayer had first pursued a rectification petition ...
![Taxpayer Pursued Rectification Petition First: Madras HC Condones 108 Days Delay in Filing Appeal [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/24/2080136-taxpayer-rectification-petition-madras-hc-filing-appeal-taxscan.webp "Taxpayer Pursued Rectification Petition First: Madras HC Condones 108 Days Delay in Filing Appeal [Read Order]")
GST 2.0 Unveiled: Council’s Landmark 56th Meeting Poised to Simplify India’s Tax Regime with Two-Tier System, Major Reforms
Introduction The clock is ticking down to what could become one of the defining episodes in India’s tax reform journey: the 56th meeting of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) Council. Scheduled...
