Data already mentioned in ER-1 Returns and non-furnishing same is not Suppression of Facts: CESTAT sustains Interest Demand on Differential Duty only for normal Period

Data - ER-1 Returns - ER-1 - non-furnishing - Suppression of Facts - CESTAT - Interest Demand - Differential Duty - taxscan

The Bangalore bench of Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) sustained the demand of interest on differential duty only for the normal period. The bench allowed the appeal partially and modified the impugned order to the extent of confirming recovery of interest for the normal period. The appellants were engaged in the manufacture…

Your free access to Taxscan has Expired

To read the article, get a premium account.

Taxscan Premium

Why should you subscribe?
  • Enjoy our website without interruptions from advertisements
  • Receive Daily newsletters
  • Receive realtime Telegram/Whatsapp news updates
  • Download original Judgements / Order / Notifications / Circulars, etc
  • Enjoy exclusive entry fees to Simplified series. (Webinars, Seminars, masterclasses, etc.)
  ₹1199 + GST for 1 year

Subscribe Now

taxscan-loader