Demand of Extended Period is not Sustainable on no Proof of Suppression of fact: CESTAT quashes Penalty u/s 11AC of CETA [Read Order]

Demand of Extended Period - Demand - Extended Period - Sustainable - Proof of Suppression of fact - CESTAT - CESTAT quashes Penalty - Penalty - taxscan

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), quashed the penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (CETA) and observed that the demand of the extended period is not sustainable in the absence of proof of suppression of fact. The respondent in the present matter is Quippo…

Your free access to Taxscan has Expired

To read the article, get a premium account.

Taxscan Premium

Why should you subscribe?
  • Enjoy our website without interruptions from advertisements
  • Receive Daily newsletters
  • Receive realtime Telegram/Whatsapp news updates
  • Download original Judgements / Order / Notifications / Circulars, etc
  • Enjoy exclusive entry fees to Simplified series. (Webinars, Seminars, masterclasses, etc.)
  ₹1199 + GST for 1 year

Subscribe Now

taxscan-loader