Rs. 8.02 Crores Dispute and Allegation of Wrongful ITC: Orissa High Court Directs Vedanta to Reply to SCN [Read Order]
The court viewed that in view of last preceding paragraph petitioner will reply to impugned show-cause notice

Orissa High Court – SCN – Crores Dispute and Allegation – ITC – Taxscan
Orissa High Court – SCN – Crores Dispute and Allegation – ITC – Taxscan
The Orissa High Court has ordered Vedanta to respond to the show cause notice about ₹8,02,84,232, which the government believes was an incorrectly obtained input tax credit (ITC).The court held that the authority says and will pass order by 5th February, 2025.
Mr. Sridharan, senior advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submitted, in respect of tax period July, 2017 to March, 2018 there happened discrepancy between his client’s account and goods and services tax (GST) annual return. It was a discrepancy, of which his client became aware and pointed out to the taxing authorities. The discrepancy was also noticed in the audit directed by the Comptroller and Auditor General.
The jurisdictional officer sought for explanation, pursuant to the audit report. His client furnished explanation to satisfaction of the officer. It was duly reported. However, the audit case was not closed but kept pending. In those facts, the authority invoked the extended period of limitation on bare allegations, to issue impugned show-cause notice dated 5th August, 2024 on the last date of the extended prescribed time. His further submission is, the authority might continue the proceeding as his client will then reply to impugned notice, for order to be made by 5th February, 2025. The writ petition be kept pending for adjudication on the order to be made, with appropriate interim protection. He seeks interference
Mr. Pattanayak, advocate, Central Government Counsel appears on behalf of opposite party no.1 (Union of India). Mr. Satapathy, advocate, Senior Standing Counsel appears on behalf of revenue (opposite party nos.2 to 4).
Boost Your Business with SME IPO Funding Strategies - Enroll Now
Mr. Satapathy relies on impugned show-cause notice to submit, discrepancies reported on the audit were not satisfactorily explained. It is only a show-cause notice. By it petitioner has further opportunity to explain. On consideration of the explanation order will duly be made. No interference is warranted.
From impugned show-cause notice, it was noticed that in respect of a sum of ₹8,02,84,232/- there is an issue between petitioner-assessee and revenue. Petitioner says it is a discrepancy while revenue says petitioner wrongly availed input tax credit (ITC). Impugned showcause notice bears record of explanation sought for by the jurisdictional officer, furnished and satisfaction recorded. All the above in respect of said sum of ₹8,02,84,232/-.
The court viewed that in view of last preceding paragraph petitioner will reply to impugned show-cause notice. The court held that the authority says and will pass order by 5th February, 2025. On communication of the order to petitioner, it will obtain advise on next course of action.
Boost Your Business with SME IPO Funding Strategies - Enroll Now
Acting Chief Justice Justice Arindam Sinha and Justice M.S. Sahoo's bench has held that the Vedanta petitioner will respond to the contested show-cause notice. Vedanta is free to include any point, including the point of limitation, in it. The order will be issued by February 5, 2025, according to the authority.
To Read the full text of the Order CLICK HERE
Support our journalism by subscribing to Taxscan premium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates