![Relief for Bridgestone India: CESTAT Sets Aside ₹96 Lakh Excise Demand for Alleged Excess CENVAT Credit [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/01/2116520-relief-for-bridgestone-india-taxscan.jfif "Relief for Bridgestone India: CESTAT Sets Aside ₹96 Lakh Excise Demand for Alleged Excess CENVAT Credit [Read Order]")
Relief for Bridgestone India: CESTAT Sets Aside ₹96 Lakh Excise Demand for Alleged Excess CENVAT Credit [Read Order]
The Principal Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) at New Delhi, has set aside a demand of central excise duty...
![CESTAT Sets Aside Section 114AA Penalty Due to Failure in Establishing Proof of Intentional Use of Manipulated Scrip [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/01/2116539-cestat-sets-aside-section-114aa-penalty-taxscan.jfif "CESTAT Sets Aside Section 114AA Penalty Due to Failure in Establishing Proof of Intentional Use of Manipulated Scrip [Read Order]")
![CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand on Cross-Border Cost-Sharing, Holds Downward Price Adjustments are Not Consideration [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/01/2116535-cestat-quashes-service-tax-demand-on-cross-border-cost-sharing-holds-downward-price-adjustments-are-not-consideration-taxscan.webp "CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand on Cross-Border Cost-Sharing, Holds Downward Price Adjustments are Not Consideration [Read Order]")
![CESTAT Sets Aside ₹1,398 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand on Indian Oil Petronas on Limitation Grounds [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/01/2116470-cestat-sets-aside-1398-crore-cenvat-credit-demand-indian-oil-petronas-limitation-grounds-taxscan.webp "CESTAT Sets Aside ₹1,398 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand on Indian Oil Petronas on Limitation Grounds [Read Order]")
Rule 8(3A) of Central Excise Rules already Declared Unconstitutional by Gujarat HC: CESTAT sets aside ₹14.14cr Demand [Read Order]
The New Delhi Principal Bench of the Customs,Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), has set aside a central excise duty demand raised under Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, ...
![Rule 8(3A) of Central Excise Rules already Declared Unconstitutional by Gujarat HC: CESTAT sets aside ₹14.14cr Demand [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/01/2116521-rule-83a-of-central-excise-rules-already-declared-unconstitutional-by-gujarat-hc-cestat-sets-aside-1414cr-demand-taxscan.webp "Rule 8(3A) of Central Excise Rules already Declared Unconstitutional by Gujarat HC: CESTAT sets aside ₹14.14cr Demand [Read Order]")
Rule 3(a) Interpretation: CESTAT Rejects Revenue’s Attempt to Reclassify Specific Goods Under Residuary Headings [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), has allowed an appeal concerning the classification of imported PVC resin, holding that the goods were...
![Rule 3(a) Interpretation: CESTAT Rejects Revenue’s Attempt to Reclassify Specific Goods Under Residuary Headings [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/01/2116491-interpretation-cestat-rejects-revenue-attempt-reclassify-specific-goods-under-residuary-headings-taxscan.webp "Rule 3(a) Interpretation: CESTAT Rejects Revenue’s Attempt to Reclassify Specific Goods Under Residuary Headings [Read Order]")
No CENVAT Reversal Required on Sale of Empty Packaging Material: CESTAT Holds Rule 6 Inapplicable to Non-Manufactured Goods [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that Rule 6(3) of the CENVAT Credit Rules applies only when both exempted and dutiable goods were...
![No CENVAT Reversal Required on Sale of Empty Packaging Material: CESTAT Holds Rule 6 Inapplicable to Non-Manufactured Goods [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/01/2116497-cestat-holds-rule-6-inapplicable-to-non-manufactured-goods-taxscan.jfif "No CENVAT Reversal Required on Sale of Empty Packaging Material: CESTAT Holds Rule 6 Inapplicable to Non-Manufactured Goods [Read Order]")
Accident Surcharge Not Insurance Service: CESTAT Sets aside Rs 2.2 Crore Service Tax Demand on Rajasthan SRTC [Read Order]
The Principal Bench of Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, held that the accident compensation surcharge collected by RSRTC was not taxable as general...
![Accident Surcharge Not Insurance Service: CESTAT Sets aside Rs 2.2 Crore Service Tax Demand on Rajasthan SRTC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/01/2116412-accident-surcharge-not-insurance-service-taxscan.webp "Accident Surcharge Not Insurance Service: CESTAT Sets aside Rs 2.2 Crore Service Tax Demand on Rajasthan SRTC [Read Order]")
Section 25(4) of Customs Act Declared Arbitrary: Karnataka HC Orders Refund to Patanjali Foods [Read Order]
The Karnataka High Court in a recent case has ordered a refund of ₹3.40 crore to Patanjali Foods, holding that Section 25(4) of the Customs Act of 1962 as amended by fiance act of 2016, is ...
![Section 25(4) of Customs Act Declared Arbitrary: Karnataka HC Orders Refund to Patanjali Foods [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/31/2116288-section-254-customs-act-declared-arbitrary-karnataka-hc-orders-refund-patanjali-foods-taxscan.webp "Section 25(4) of Customs Act Declared Arbitrary: Karnataka HC Orders Refund to Patanjali Foods [Read Order]")
![Director cannot Be Penalised Without Personal Involvement in Service Tax Evasion: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/31/2116226-director-cannot-be-penalised-without-personal-involvement-service-tax-evasion-cestat-taxscan.webp "Director cannot Be Penalised Without Personal Involvement in Service Tax Evasion: CESTAT [Read Order]")
