![Relief for BPL Ltd: CESTAT Rules Payment Received from JVA as Pure Reimbursement for Business Transfer Delay, Not Manpower Supply [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/24/500x300_2068501-cestat-bpl-ltd-jva-taxscan.webp "Relief for BPL Ltd: CESTAT Rules Payment Received from JVA as Pure Reimbursement for Business Transfer Delay, Not Manpower Supply [Read Order]")
Relief for BPL Ltd: CESTAT Rules Payment Received from JVA as Pure Reimbursement for Business Transfer Delay, Not Manpower Supply [Read Order]
The Bangalore Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that the payments received by BPL Ltd from its joint...
![CESTAT Sets Aside Penalty for Non-Membership as Customs Broker Obtained Association Membership Before SCN Was Served [Read Oder]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/24/250x150_2068456-quantum-assessment-1.webp "CESTAT Sets Aside Penalty for Non-Membership as Customs Broker Obtained Association Membership Before SCN Was Served [Read Oder]")
![Customs Classifies Animal Feed as Edible Nuts: Madras HC Finds ₹1 Cr Bank Guarantee on ₹18L Import Onerous, Orders Reconsideration [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/24/250x150_2068401-bank-guarantee-customs-classifies-madras-high-court-taxscan.webp "Customs Classifies Animal Feed as Edible Nuts: Madras HC Finds ₹1 Cr Bank Guarantee on ₹18L Import Onerous, Orders Reconsideration [Read Order]")
![Customs Broker Licence Revoked Under Regulation 17(7): Madras HC directs to Approach CESTAT, Dismisses Writ Petition [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/24/250x150_2068383-violation-of-regulation-of-cblr-proven-cestat-upholds-revocation-of-customs-broker-license-cblr-revocation-of-customs-broker-license-customs-broker-license-cestat-taxscan.webp "Customs Broker Licence Revoked Under Regulation 17(7): Madras HC directs to Approach CESTAT, Dismisses Writ Petition [Read Order]")
![Half-Yearly Customs, Excise and Service Tax Case Digest: CESTAT Decisions 2025 [Part II]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/23/250x150_2068008-cestat-2.webp "Half-Yearly Customs, Excise and Service Tax Case Digest: CESTAT Decisions 2025 [Part II]")
![Half-Yearly Customs, Excise and Service Tax Case Digest: CESTAT Decisions 2025 [Part I]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/23/500x300_2068009-cestat-case-digest-taxscan.webp "Half-Yearly Customs, Excise and Service Tax Case Digest: CESTAT Decisions 2025 [Part I]")
Customs Revisional Order Based on Another’s Case Without Assessing Taxpayer’s Defense: Madras HC Remands Matter [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court held that a customs revisional order is invalid if it is passed solely based on findings in another person’s case without properly considering the...
![Customs Revisional Order Based on Another’s Case Without Assessing Taxpayer’s Defense: Madras HC Remands Matter [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/23/500x300_2068151-revision-order-taxscan.webp "Customs Revisional Order Based on Another’s Case Without Assessing Taxpayer’s Defense: Madras HC Remands Matter [Read Order]")
MoU proves Taxpayer’s Active Role in Managing EOU: CESTAT upholds Penalty for Clandestine Removal of Goods [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) and related evidence proved the appellant’s active involvement...
![MoU proves Taxpayer’s Active Role in Managing EOU: CESTAT upholds Penalty for Clandestine Removal of Goods [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/23/500x300_2067975-mou-proves-taxpayers-active-role-in-managing-eou-taxpayers-active-role-in-managing-eou-taxscan.webp "MoU proves Taxpayer’s Active Role in Managing EOU: CESTAT upholds Penalty for Clandestine Removal of Goods [Read Order]")
S. 35C(1A) of Central Excise Act Limits Adjournments to Three: CESTAT dismisses Appeal for Non-Prosecution [Read Order]
M/s Alcons Infratech vs Commissioner of Central Excise & Service TaxThe Allahabad Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that an appeal cannot be...
![S. 35C(1A) of Central Excise Act Limits Adjournments to Three: CESTAT dismisses Appeal for Non-Prosecution [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/23/500x300_2067998-central-excise-act-adjournments-cestat-appeal-taxscan.webp "S. 35C(1A) of Central Excise Act Limits Adjournments to Three: CESTAT dismisses Appeal for Non-Prosecution [Read Order]")
Cash Vans Provided with Drivers fall under 'Supply of Tangible Goods Service', not Deemed Sale/Transportation: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that providing cash vans with drivers to banks falls under the category of “Supply of Tangible Goods...
![Cash Vans Provided with Drivers fall under Supply of Tangible Goods Service, not Deemed Sale/Transportation: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/23/500x300_2067978-cash-vans-taxscan.webp "Cash Vans Provided with Drivers fall under Supply of Tangible Goods Service, not Deemed Sale/Transportation: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Cement Acted Only as Binder, Not Primary Base: CESTAT rules Sand Lime Bricks Cannot Be Classified as Cement Bricks [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that bricks manufactured using sand and lime with cement acting only as a binder cannot be classified as...
![Cement Acted Only as Binder, Not Primary Base: CESTAT rules Sand Lime Bricks Cannot Be Classified as Cement Bricks [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/23/500x300_2067950-sand-lime-bricks-taxscan.webp "Cement Acted Only as Binder, Not Primary Base: CESTAT rules Sand Lime Bricks Cannot Be Classified as Cement Bricks [Read Order]")
![CESTAT Lacks Jurisdiction in Gold Smuggling Case Involving Passenger Baggage [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/23/500x300_2067935-cestat-cestat-lacks-of-jurisdiction-lacks-of-jurisdiction-taxscan.webp "CESTAT Lacks Jurisdiction in Gold Smuggling Case Involving Passenger Baggage [Read Order]")