Failure to Comply Provision of sec. 75(4) of CGST Act 2017 Invalidates Entire Order: Calcutta HC [Read Order]

The HC remanded the matter back to the proper officer, with a direction to re-adjudicate the issues involved in the show-cause upon giving an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner or his authorized representative
Section 75(4) - Section 75(4) Of CGST Act - CGST Act - CGST - CGST Act 2017 - Calcutta HC - Calcutta High Court - cgst news - Comply Provision of Section 75(4) - Calcutta High Court on Section 75(4) Of CGST Act - taxscan

In a recent case, the Calcutta High Court held that failure to comply with statutory provision which mandates consideration of explanation on the part of assessee before passing adverse order invalidates such order.

The petitioner/ assessee, Arup Mallick had approached the Writ Court complaining that although a show cause notice was served on the petitioner in Form GSTDRC-01, however, despite permitting the petitioner to submit his response, the Department/ Respondent passed an order without affording sufficient opportunity of hearing.

Get a Copy of GST SIMPLIFIED in Question & Answer Format, Click here

The Bench viewed the submission of counsel for assessee that the petitioner could not file his response within the time specified being unwell. The Bench accepted that since the statute recognizes a right for the assessee to be afforded with an opportunity of personal hearing when the Department contemplate passing of an adverse order, failure to offer such opportunity to the assessee tantamount to failure of complying with statutory provision.

The Bench also admitted that the final order passed by the proper officer under Section 73 of the Central Good and Service Tax Act (CGST), 2017 in absence of proper hearing is not maintainable.

Get a Copy of GST SIMPLIFIED in Question & Answer Format, Click here

Even though the petitioner was duly served with a show cause notice in Form GSTDRC01, the petitioner failed to file any response to the same, on account of being not well, for which medical prescriptions were also attached, added the Bench.

The Single Bench of Justice Raja Basu Chowdhury observed that as per section 75 (4) of the act affording an opportunity of hearing is mandated where a request is received in writing from the person chargeable with tax, or penalty or where any adverse decision is contemplated against such person.

Get a Copy of GST SIMPLIFIED in Question & Answer Format, Click here

The High Court remanded the matter back to the proper officer, with a direction to re-adjudicate the issues involved in the show-cause upon giving an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner or his authorized representative.

Subscribe Taxscan Premium to view the Judgment

Support our journalism by subscribing to Taxscan premium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates

taxscan-loader