Top
Begin typing your search above and press return to search.

Failure to Verify Excise Duty Paid Before SCN: CESTAT Orders De Novo Adjudication [Read Order]

CESTAT remanded excise duty appeals for fresh adjudication after finding that payments made before issuance of show cause notices were not verified by the authorities.

Kavi Priya
Failure to Verify Excise Duty Paid Before SCN: CESTAT Orders De Novo Adjudication [Read Order]
X

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that failure to verify excise duty payments allegedly made before the issuance of a show cause notice (SCN) necessitated a de novo adjudication. Sri Venkateswara Sago Products and several other sago and starch manufacturers, the appellants, challenged orders passed by the Commissioner of Central...


The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that failure to verify excise duty payments allegedly made before the issuance of a show cause notice (SCN) necessitated a de novo adjudication.

Sri Venkateswara Sago Products and several other sago and starch manufacturers, the appellants, challenged orders passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals). The appeals were dismissed at the first appellate stage for non-compliance with the mandatory pre-deposit requirement under the Central Excise Act.

Know Practical Aspects of Tax Planning, Click Here

Read More: 5% or 2% TDS on Rent in FY 2024-25? Here’s How to Claim a Refund for Overpaid TDS via TRACES

The appellants' counsel argued that they had already paid the excise duty amounts in question even before the issuance of the SCNs. They argued that the appellate authority failed to consider these payments and rejected their appeals purely on technical grounds without proper verification. They sought remand of the matter to enable verification of their payments and adjudication on merits.

The revenue countered that the appellants did not cooperate during the proceedings and failed to produce documentary evidence in support of their claims. The revenue submitted that non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement was clear and that there was no procedural irregularity in dismissing the appeals.

How to Compute Income from Salary with Tax Planning, Click Here

The two-member bench comprising P. Dinesha (Judicial Member) and M. Ajit Kumar (Technical Member) observed that the appellants claimed to have made payments before the SCNs, but they had not effectively assisted the lower authorities by providing necessary documentation.

Read More: Checklist for Preparing Financial Statements as per Revised Schedule III of Companies Act

The tribunal pointed out that the proper course was to verify the appellants’ payment claims before proceeding to decide the appeals. It directed the first appellate authority to call for a report from the adjudicating authority regarding the alleged excise duty payments. The tribunal ordered a fresh de novo adjudication after verification, setting aside the earlier dismissal orders.

The tribunal instructed that the de novo order must be passed within 90 days from receipt of this order. The appellants were directed to fully cooperate with the authorities during this process. The appeals were allowed by way of remand for fresh verification.

To Read the full text of the Order CLICK HERE

Support our journalism by subscribing to Taxscanpremium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates

Next Story

Related Stories

All Rights Reserved. Copyright @2019