![Rights Accrued under Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 were not taken away by the 2016 Amendment: Calcutta HC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Calcutta-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "Rights Accrued under Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 were not taken away by the 2016 Amendment: Calcutta HC [Read Judgment]")
Rights Accrued under Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 were not taken away by the 2016 Amendment: Calcutta HC [Read Judgment]
In a recent case, the Calcutta High Court held that the rights which had accrued to the appellant could not, in the absence of an express provision be...
![Revised Return can be Filed Belatedly by the Companies Incorporated under Schemes of Arrangement and Amalgamation: Supreme Court [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Supreme-Court-of-India-Taxscan-min.jpg "Revised Return can be Filed Belatedly by the Companies Incorporated under Schemes of Arrangement and Amalgamation: Supreme Court [Read Judgment]")
![Company is Entitled to avail ITC on Activities Performed by their Contractors: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/CESTAT-ITC-Ramco-Taxscan.jpg "Company is Entitled to avail ITC on Activities Performed by their Contractors: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Patiala House Courts grants Bail in alleged evasion of GST via bogus Input Tax Credit [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Patiala-House-Courts-GST-Taxscan.jpg "Patiala House Courts grants Bail in alleged evasion of GST via bogus Input Tax Credit [Read Order]")
![M/s Adani M2K Projects LLP held Guilty of Profiteering by NAA [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Adani-M2K-Projects-LLP-Taxscan.jpg "M/s Adani M2K Projects LLP held Guilty of Profiteering by NAA [Read Order]")
CST not leviable merely on Assumption of Pre-Existing Contract implicating Branch Transfer: Madras HC [Read Judgment]
The Madras High Court in its case M/s Advance Paints (P) Ltd. v Commercial Tax Officer held that no liability to pay CST arises merely on the assumption of pre-existing contract implicating branch...
![CST not leviable merely on Assumption of Pre-Existing Contract implicating Branch Transfer: Madras HC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Reassessment-Madras-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "CST not leviable merely on Assumption of Pre-Existing Contract implicating Branch Transfer: Madras HC [Read Judgment]")
![Signature Builders held Guilty of Profiteering [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Builders-and-Developers.jpg "Signature Builders held Guilty of Profiteering [Read Order]")
No Re-Opening of Assessments under Section 42(3) that were Completed Years ago: Kerala High Court [Read Judgment]
The Kerala High Court has upheld the constitutional validity of Section 42(3) of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2005 which retrospective effect of the said provision to re-open assessments that have...
![No Re-Opening of Assessments under Section 42(3) that were Completed Years ago: Kerala High Court [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/KVAT-Act-Kerala-High-Court-GST-Taxscan.jpg "No Re-Opening of Assessments under Section 42(3) that were Completed Years ago: Kerala High Court [Read Judgment]")
![GST Evasion: Rajasthan HC denies Bail in issuing Fake GST Invoices [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Fake-GST-Invoices-Bail-Taxscan.jpg "GST Evasion: Rajasthan HC denies Bail in issuing Fake GST Invoices [Read Order]")
Claiming Credit of VAT Paid on the Inputs, But Not Discharged Any Output VAT Liability Amounts to Profiteering: NAA [Read Order]
In a recent case, the National Anti-Profiteering Authority held that the Respondent had claimed credit of VAT paid on the inputs, but he had not discharged any output VAT liability would amount to...
![Claiming Credit of VAT Paid on the Inputs, But Not Discharged Any Output VAT Liability Amounts to Profiteering: NAA [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Anti-Profiteering-Authority-Taxscan-1.jpg "Claiming Credit of VAT Paid on the Inputs, But Not Discharged Any Output VAT Liability Amounts to Profiteering: NAA [Read Order]")
No Jurisdiction of PCIT to Enquire u/s 263 Where Assessee had already Commenced his Business: ITAT [Read Order]
The Delhi bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) in the case of Brahma Center Development Pvt Ltd v PCIT held that where after an enquiry the AO took the view that interest amount is not...
![No Jurisdiction of PCIT to Enquire u/s 263 Where Assessee had already Commenced his Business: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Cross-Examination-ITAT-Taxscan.jpg "No Jurisdiction of PCIT to Enquire u/s 263 Where Assessee had already Commenced his Business: ITAT [Read Order]")