![Styrene-Butadiene Copolymer to Be Classified as ‘Polymers of Styrene’, Not Synthetic Rubber: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/11/500x300_2062847-cestat-polymers-styrene-taxscan.webp "Styrene-Butadiene Copolymer to Be Classified as ‘Polymers of Styrene’, Not Synthetic Rubber: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Styrene-Butadiene Copolymer to Be Classified as ‘Polymers of Styrene’, Not Synthetic Rubber: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that Styrene-Butadiene Copolymer (SBC) should be ...
![Allahabad HC Quashes GST Orders for Not Granting Proper Hearing Prior to S.73 Order [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/11/250x150_2062827-gst-order-taxscan.webp "Allahabad HC Quashes GST Orders for Not Granting Proper Hearing Prior to S.73 Order [Read Order]")
![Section 50C Income Tax Addition Not Applicable When Registered Sale Agreement Precedes Circle Rate Hike: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/11/250x150_2062837-incometax-addition-taxscan.webp "Section 50C Income Tax Addition Not Applicable When Registered Sale Agreement Precedes Circle Rate Hike: Delhi HC [Read Order]")
![Service of GST Notices via Email: Allahabad HC Finds Service Valid, Dismisses Petition Citing Alternate Remedy [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/11/250x150_2062806-service-of-gst-notices-via-email-1.webp "Service of GST Notices via Email: Allahabad HC Finds Service Valid, Dismisses Petition Citing Alternate Remedy [Read Order]")
![Unexplained 33- Fold Share Price Increase: ITAT Upholds ₹80.17 Lakh Bogus LTCG Addition u/s 68 [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/11/250x150_2062842-agra-income-tax-appellate-tribunal-income-tax-bogus-ltcg-addition-taxscan.webp "Unexplained 33- Fold Share Price Increase: ITAT Upholds ₹80.17 Lakh Bogus LTCG Addition u/s 68 [Read Order]")
GST Order Invalid if SCN Issued Only via Portal After Registration Cancellation: Allahabad HC [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Allahabad High Court held that a GST assessment order is invalid if a show cause notice is issued only through the GST portal after the taxpayer’s registration has been...
![GST Order Invalid if SCN Issued Only via Portal After Registration Cancellation: Allahabad HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/11/500x300_2062803-gst-order-invalid-taxscan.webp "GST Order Invalid if SCN Issued Only via Portal After Registration Cancellation: Allahabad HC [Read Order]")
In Absence of Concrete Material Revision u/s 263 of Income Tax Act Not Possible on Assessment Based on DVO's Valuation: Kerala HC [Read Order]
The Kerala High Court ruled that, in the absence of tangible evidence, an assessment based on the Department Valuation Officer's (DVO) valuation cannot be changed under Section 263 of the Income Tax...
![In Absence of Concrete Material Revision u/s 263 of Income Tax Act Not Possible on Assessment Based on DVOs Valuation: Kerala HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/11/500x300_2062787-kerala-hc-1.webp "In Absence of Concrete Material Revision u/s 263 of Income Tax Act Not Possible on Assessment Based on DVOs Valuation: Kerala HC [Read Order]")
ITAT Deletes ₹52.91 Lakh Unexplained Investment Addition on Land Purchase Due to Unreliable Draft MOU Evidence [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) deleted an addition of Rs. 52,91,053 made by the Assessing Officer ( AO ) as unexplained investment under Section 69 and ruled that...
![ITAT Deletes ₹52.91 Lakh Unexplained Investment Addition on Land Purchase Due to Unreliable Draft MOU Evidence [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/11/500x300_2062786-income-tax-addition-on-account-of-unexplained-investment-income-tax-addition-unexplained-investment-failure-of-assessee-to-compile-data-and-information-taxscan.webp "ITAT Deletes ₹52.91 Lakh Unexplained Investment Addition on Land Purchase Due to Unreliable Draft MOU Evidence [Read Order]")
Taxpayer Can Raise Additional Claims Before Appellate Authorities: ITAT Allows ₹4.90 Cr ESOP claim [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) allowed a deduction of Rs. 4,90,35,650 for Employee Stock Option Plans (ESOPs) expenses, including an additional claim of Rs. ...
![Taxpayer Can Raise Additional Claims Before Appellate Authorities: ITAT Allows ₹4.90 Cr ESOP claim [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/11/500x300_2062785-esop-itat-taxscan.webp "Taxpayer Can Raise Additional Claims Before Appellate Authorities: ITAT Allows ₹4.90 Cr ESOP claim [Read Order]")
Relief for Aditya Birla: ITAT Rules Disallowance u/s 40(a) Cannot Be Retaxed if Provision Reversed in Subsequent Year [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled that disallowance under Section 40(a) for earlier years cannot be added back again when the entire provision has been reversed in a...
![Relief for Aditya Birla: ITAT Rules Disallowance u/s 40(a) Cannot Be Retaxed if Provision Reversed in Subsequent Year [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/11/500x300_2062770-ca-chartered-accountant-ca-job-vacancy-mba-vacancy-jobscan-taxscan.webp "Relief for Aditya Birla: ITAT Rules Disallowance u/s 40(a) Cannot Be Retaxed if Provision Reversed in Subsequent Year [Read Order]")
CESTAT Upholds classification of Activity by Adjudicating authority under ‘works contract service’ as assessee paid service tax by opting scheme as per State VAT Rules [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Bangalore bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)upheld the classification of Activity by the Adjudicating authority under ‘works contract ...
![CESTAT Upholds classification of Activity by Adjudicating authority under ‘works contract service’ as assessee paid service tax by opting scheme as per State VAT Rules [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/11/500x300_2062779-work-contract-service-taxscan.webp "CESTAT Upholds classification of Activity by Adjudicating authority under ‘works contract service’ as assessee paid service tax by opting scheme as per State VAT Rules [Read Order]")
Failure to Deposit 2 Month License Fee as Bank Guarantee as Per Tender: Chhattisgarh HC Disposed of Petition Considering Time Extension Given [Read Order]
The Chhattisgarh High Court observed that failure to deposit 2 months license fee as a bank guarantee as per tender for running Ahata in Ganjpara composite liquor shop, and disposed of the petition...
![Failure to Deposit 2 Month License Fee as Bank Guarantee as Per Tender: Chhattisgarh HC Disposed of Petition Considering Time Extension Given [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/11/500x300_2062761-deposit-bank-guarantee-chhattisgarh-hc-taxscan.webp "Failure to Deposit 2 Month License Fee as Bank Guarantee as Per Tender: Chhattisgarh HC Disposed of Petition Considering Time Extension Given [Read Order]")