![Application seeking Approval under section 80G(5)(i) Rejected on technical ground without providing Time for Rectification: ITAT allows Rectification [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/13/500x300_2043566-itat-teachnical-taxscan.webp "Application seeking Approval under section 80G(5)(i) Rejected on technical ground without providing Time for Rectification: ITAT allows Rectification [Read Order]")
Application seeking Approval under section 80G(5)(i) Rejected on technical ground without providing Time for Rectification: ITAT allows Rectification [Read Order]
The Delhi bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) allowed the rectification of error on the application seeking approval under section 80...
![ITAT Deletes Rs. 24 Lakh Capitation Fee Addition Due to Lack of Evidence Linking Payment to Assessee [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/13/250x150_2043626-itat-deletes-rs-24-lakh-capitation-fee-taxscan.webp "ITAT Deletes Rs. 24 Lakh Capitation Fee Addition Due to Lack of Evidence Linking Payment to Assessee [Read Order]")
Service Tax Demand on Ad Space Sales Pre-2014 Not Sustainable Under Section 66D(g): CESTAT [Read Order]
The Delhi bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that the service tax demand on advertisement space sales prior to 2014 is not sustainable under Section 66D(g)...
![Service Tax Demand on Ad Space Sales Pre-2014 Not Sustainable Under Section 66D(g): CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/13/500x300_2043631-service-tax-demad-site-img.webp "Service Tax Demand on Ad Space Sales Pre-2014 Not Sustainable Under Section 66D(g): CESTAT [Read Order]")
Denying Benefits of SVLDR Scheme is contrary to object of scheme : Himachal Pradesh HC allows Time to pay Dues during Covid Pandemic [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Himachal Pradesh High Court has ruled that denying the benefits of SVLDR Scheme would not only contrary to object of the scheme but also would also be injustice to the...
![Denying Benefits of SVLDR Scheme is contrary to object of scheme : Himachal Pradesh HC allows Time to pay Dues during Covid Pandemic [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/13/500x300_2043624-svldr-scheme-himachal-pradesh-hc-dues-covid-pandemic-taxscan.webp "Denying Benefits of SVLDR Scheme is contrary to object of scheme : Himachal Pradesh HC allows Time to pay Dues during Covid Pandemic [Read Order]")
Revenue Fails to Obtain Mandatory Approval u/s 151(ii) for Cases Over ₹50 Lakh Beyond Three Years: Madras HC Quashes Reassessment [Read Order]
In a recent judgment, the Madras High Court quashed a reassessment order issued by the Income Tax Department against Core Logistic Company after finding that the notice was issued without the proper...
![Revenue Fails to Obtain Mandatory Approval u/s 151(ii) for Cases Over ₹50 Lakh Beyond Three Years: Madras HC Quashes Reassessment [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/13/500x300_2043605-revenue-madras-high-court-taxscan.webp "Revenue Fails to Obtain Mandatory Approval u/s 151(ii) for Cases Over ₹50 Lakh Beyond Three Years: Madras HC Quashes Reassessment [Read Order]")
![Service Tax Demand on Ad Space Sales Pre-2014 Not Sustainable Under Section 66D(g): CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/13/500x300_2043609-cestat-service-tax-demand-service-tax-taxscan.webp "Service Tax Demand on Ad Space Sales Pre-2014 Not Sustainable Under Section 66D(g): CESTAT [Read Order]")
GST Notice Returned “Addressee Left”: Madras HC Stresses Dept’s Duty to Ensure Proper Delivery Through Alternative Means [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court set aside a GST assessment order after finding that the notice was not served at the correct address of the taxpayer. The court emphasized that when...
![GST Notice Returned “Addressee Left”: Madras HC Stresses Dept’s Duty to Ensure Proper Delivery Through Alternative Means [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/13/500x300_2043591-gst-notices-common-portal-taxscan-1.webp "GST Notice Returned “Addressee Left”: Madras HC Stresses Dept’s Duty to Ensure Proper Delivery Through Alternative Means [Read Order]")
Option Money to be treated as “Capital Receipt”: ITAT Directs AO to Recompute Capital Gains on Dabur’s Sale of 23% Stake in Aviva JV [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that option money to be treated as “Capital Receipt” and directed Assessing Officer (AO) to recompute capital gains on Dabur’s...
![Option Money to be treated as “Capital Receipt”: ITAT Directs AO to Recompute Capital Gains on Dabur’s Sale of 23% Stake in Aviva JV [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/13/500x300_2043593-dabur.webp "Option Money to be treated as “Capital Receipt”: ITAT Directs AO to Recompute Capital Gains on Dabur’s Sale of 23% Stake in Aviva JV [Read Order]")
Processing Intimation under section 143(1) of Income Tax Act without giving 30 days time to assesee is bad in law: ITAT Sets aside order against Samsung C & T Corporation [Read Order]
The New Delhi bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) setaside order against Samsung C & T Corportion as the processing intimation under section 143(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961 without...
![Processing Intimation under section 143(1) of Income Tax Act without giving 30 days time to assesee is bad in law: ITAT Sets aside order against Samsung C & T Corporation [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/13/500x300_2043585-processing-intimation-processing-intimation-under-section-1431-of-income-tax-act-taxscan.webp "Processing Intimation under section 143(1) of Income Tax Act without giving 30 days time to assesee is bad in law: ITAT Sets aside order against Samsung C & T Corporation [Read Order]")