![Late Fee Levy u/s 234E for TDS Returns Prior to June 2015 Invalid: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/TDS-Returns.jpg "Late Fee Levy u/s 234E for TDS Returns Prior to June 2015 Invalid: ITAT [Read Order]")
Late Fee Levy u/s 234E for TDS Returns Prior to June 2015 Invalid: ITAT [Read Order]
The Pune Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) deleted the late fees imposed under Section 234E of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the...
![Appeal on Service Tax for Educational Construction Not Maintainable: Delhi HC Directs Revenue to Approach Supreme Court u/s 35L of CEA [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/educational-construction-Taxscan.jpg "Appeal on Service Tax for Educational Construction Not Maintainable: Delhi HC Directs Revenue to Approach Supreme Court u/s 35L of CEA [Read Order]")
![Calcutta HC directs Assessee to file Fresh Refund Application u/s 54 of CGST Act as Statute mandates it after Rectifying Deficiency [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Calcutta-High-Court-site-img.jpg "Calcutta HC directs Assessee to file Fresh Refund Application u/s 54 of CGST Act as Statute mandates it after Rectifying Deficiency [Read Order]")
Challenge against Difference in taxable value of invoice in GSTR-2A: Calcutta HC remands Matter for fresh adjudication [Read Order]
The Calcutta High Court has remanded the challenge on difference in taxable value of invoice mentioned in GSTR-2A for fresh adjudication by the adjudicating authority. It was held that “ The...
![Challenge against Difference in taxable value of invoice in GSTR-2A: Calcutta HC remands Matter for fresh adjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/invoice-in-GSTR-2A.jpg "Challenge against Difference in taxable value of invoice in GSTR-2A: Calcutta HC remands Matter for fresh adjudication [Read Order]")
Unregistered Agreement Not Valid for Capital Gains: ITAT Deletes Rs. 30.5 Lakh and Rs. 2.3 Cr Additions for Property Transaction [Read Order]
The Pune Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has set aside additions of Rs. 30.5 lakh under Section 56(vii)(b) and Rs. 2.3 crore as short-term capital gains, holding that an...
![Unregistered Agreement Not Valid for Capital Gains: ITAT Deletes Rs. 30.5 Lakh and Rs. 2.3 Cr Additions for Property Transaction [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/agreement.jpg "Unregistered Agreement Not Valid for Capital Gains: ITAT Deletes Rs. 30.5 Lakh and Rs. 2.3 Cr Additions for Property Transaction [Read Order]")
Genuineness of Business Transaction Affirmed: ITAT Deletes Rs. 4.90 Lakh Addition for Director's Loan [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has set aside an addition of Rs. 4.90 lakh made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and affirmed the genuineness of a business...
![Genuineness of Business Transaction Affirmed: ITAT Deletes Rs. 4.90 Lakh Addition for Directors Loan [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ITAT-Delhi-ITAT-Unexplained-Cash-Unexplained-Cash-Credits-Taxscan-1.jpg "Genuineness of Business Transaction Affirmed: ITAT Deletes Rs. 4.90 Lakh Addition for Directors Loan [Read Order]")
CESTAT sets aside Demand of Service Tax and Penalties as ST-3 returns Not Required in terms of S. 70 of Finance Act [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Delhi bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)Â has set aside the demand of service tax and penalties imposed as ST-3 returns is not required...
![CESTAT sets aside Demand of Service Tax and Penalties as ST-3 returns Not Required in terms of S. 70 of Finance Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Proper-filing-ST-3-Returns-Statutory-Returns-CESTAT-Service-Tax-Demand-Extended-Period-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT sets aside Demand of Service Tax and Penalties as ST-3 returns Not Required in terms of S. 70 of Finance Act [Read Order]")
Substantial Justice Over Technicalities: ITAT Condones 98 Days Delay in Filing Appeal Citing Taxpayer’s Illiteracy [Read Order]
The Rajkot Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has condoned a 98-day delay in filing an appeal and remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer (AO) for fresh adjudication, emphasizing...
![Substantial Justice Over Technicalities: ITAT Condones 98 Days Delay in Filing Appeal Citing Taxpayer’s Illiteracy [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Filing-Appeal-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Substantial Justice Over Technicalities: ITAT Condones 98 Days Delay in Filing Appeal Citing Taxpayer’s Illiteracy [Read Order]")
