![Voluntary Payment of GST Penalty concludes all Proceedings u/s 129: Orissa HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Penalty-Taxpayer-ITAT-Confirms-Penalty-Taxscan.jpg "Voluntary Payment of GST Penalty concludes all Proceedings u/s 129: Orissa HC [Read Order]")
Voluntary Payment of GST Penalty concludes all Proceedings u/s 129: Orissa HC [Read Order]
The Orissa High Court recently reaffirmed that all proceedings under Section 129 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) once the...
![Mere Non-Compliance of Summons u/s 131 Not Ground for Addition u/s 68 When Evidences Furnished before AO: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Incriminating-Material-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Mere Non-Compliance of Summons u/s 131 Not Ground for Addition u/s 68 When Evidences Furnished before AO: ITAT [Read Order]")
![GST Demand Order Passed alleging Excess ITC Claim: Madras HC directs to Consider Application for Rectification of Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/gst-demand-site-img.jpg "GST Demand Order Passed alleging Excess ITC Claim: Madras HC directs to Consider Application for Rectification of Order [Read Order]")
![Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Amendment Rules, 2025: A Detailed Explanation [Read Notification]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/accounting-standards-site-img.jpg "Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Amendment Rules, 2025: A Detailed Explanation [Read Notification]")
![Non-Disclosure of Related Party Transactions in Board Report violates S. 134(3)(h): MCA Imposes ₹4 Lakh Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/MCA-site-img-1.jpg "Non-Disclosure of Related Party Transactions in Board Report violates S. 134(3)(h): MCA Imposes ₹4 Lakh Penalty [Read Order]")
Sada Tambaku Pre-Mixed with Lime Classified as Chewing Tobacco, Attracts 28% GST: AAR [Read Order]
The Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) ruled that “sada tambaku” pre-mixed with lime is classifiable as chewing tobacco under HSN 24039910 and is liable to Goods and Services Tax (GST) at the...
![Sada Tambaku Pre-Mixed with Lime Classified as Chewing Tobacco, Attracts 28% GST: AAR [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/tobacco-AAR-taxscan.jpg "Sada Tambaku Pre-Mixed with Lime Classified as Chewing Tobacco, Attracts 28% GST: AAR [Read Order]")
Clandestine Removal Charges Without Corroboration of Recovered Documents is Invalid: CESTAT [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the charges of clandestine removal without corroboration of recovered documents are...
![Clandestine Removal Charges Without Corroboration of Recovered Documents is Invalid: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Clandestine-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Clandestine Removal Charges Without Corroboration of Recovered Documents is Invalid: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Service Tax Paid under Mistake of Law: CESTAT Allows Refund with 12% Interest [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/CESTAT-CESTAT-Delhi-Service-tax-refund-case-TAXSCAN.jpg "Service Tax Paid under Mistake of Law: CESTAT Allows Refund with 12% Interest [Read Order]")
Failure to Affix CIN in Company's Board Report Submitted through E-form 23AC and 23ACA: MCA Fines Company and Directors ₹6,000 [Read Order]
In a recent adjudication order, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) imposed a cumulative penalty of ₹6,000 on Private Limited company and its two directors for violating Section 12(3)(c) of the...
![Failure to Affix CIN in Companys Board Report Submitted through E-form 23AC and 23ACA: MCA Fines Company and Directors ₹6,000 [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/MCA-MGT-3-CA-CS-CMA-taxscan.jpg-1.webp "Failure to Affix CIN in Companys Board Report Submitted through E-form 23AC and 23ACA: MCA Fines Company and Directors ₹6,000 [Read Order]")
AO shall not make Addition u/s 69A of Income Tax solely Relying on Whatsapp Image without any Corroborative Evidence: ITAT terms it ‘Dumb Document’ [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) , Mumbai Bench, has held that an addition under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 cannot be sustained solely on the basis of a WhatsApp image found on...
![AO shall not make Addition u/s 69A of Income Tax solely Relying on Whatsapp Image without any Corroborative Evidence: ITAT terms it ‘Dumb Document’ [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ITAT-ITAT-Mumbai-Section-69A-income-tax-act-TAXSCAN.webp "AO shall not make Addition u/s 69A of Income Tax solely Relying on Whatsapp Image without any Corroborative Evidence: ITAT terms it ‘Dumb Document’ [Read Order]")