![CESTAT Overturns Service Tax Ruling, Remands Case for Re-evaluation of Employment Contracts and Tax Liability [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Tax-Liability-1.jpg "CESTAT Overturns Service Tax Ruling, Remands Case for Re-evaluation of Employment Contracts and Tax Liability [Read Order]")
CESTAT Overturns Service Tax Ruling, Remands Case for Re-evaluation of Employment Contracts and Tax Liability [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) in Mumbai overturned a service tax ruling against Garware Polyester Ltd, remanding...
![Bombay HC Rules Basis for Infrastructure Fee Deduction Must Be Actual Receipts, Not Gross Advertising Bills [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Infrastructure-Fee-Deduction-high-court-taxscan.jpg "Bombay HC Rules Basis for Infrastructure Fee Deduction Must Be Actual Receipts, Not Gross Advertising Bills [Read Order]")
![Bombay HC uses forum conveniens Doctrine to Dismiss Trustcap’s Income Tax Matter with Cause of Action at Kolkata [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Bombay-HC-forum-conveniens-Doctrine-Dismiss-Trustcaps-Income-Tax-Matter-Cause-of-Action-at-Kolkata-taxscan.jpg "Bombay HC uses forum conveniens Doctrine to Dismiss Trustcap’s Income Tax Matter with Cause of Action at Kolkata [Read Order]")
![ITAT Delhi Deletes Rs. 24 Lakh Addition, due to Absence of AO’s Justification for Rejecting Assessee’s Explanation [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/itat.jpg "ITAT Delhi Deletes Rs. 24 Lakh Addition, due to Absence of AO’s Justification for Rejecting Assessee’s Explanation [Read Order]")
![Sikkimese Identity Alone Not Sufficient for S.10(26AAA) Exemption, All Conditions Must Be Verified: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Undue-Benefit-Tax-Payer-Tax-ITAT-Taxscan.jpg.webp "Sikkimese Identity Alone Not Sufficient for S.10(26AAA) Exemption, All Conditions Must Be Verified: ITAT [Read Order]")
CIT(A) Deleted Unexplained Cash Deposit Additions without AO’s Remand Report: ITAT Remands Matter for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) has remanded the matter to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)], who deleted additions without obtaining the remand...
![CIT(A) Deleted Unexplained Cash Deposit Additions without AO’s Remand Report: ITAT Remands Matter for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ITAT-Unexplained-cash-deposit-addition-ITAT-Ahmedabad-TAXSCAN.jpg "CIT(A) Deleted Unexplained Cash Deposit Additions without AO’s Remand Report: ITAT Remands Matter for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]")
Land Transferred Under Development Agreement Without Consideration: ITAT Remands Rs. 60 Lakh LTCG Addition for Reassessment [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) remanded a case involving Rs. 60.51 lakh addition under Long-Term Capital Gains ( LTCG ), observing that the land in question was...
![Land Transferred Under Development Agreement Without Consideration: ITAT Remands Rs. 60 Lakh LTCG Addition for Reassessment [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ITAT-ITAT-Ahmedabad-Land-Transferred-Under-Development-Agreement-TAXSCAN.jpg "Land Transferred Under Development Agreement Without Consideration: ITAT Remands Rs. 60 Lakh LTCG Addition for Reassessment [Read Order]")
Corpus Contributions to Section 12A Registered Trust Not Taxable, Treated as Capital Receipts: ITAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dismissed the appeal filed by the revenue holding that Corpus contributions to registered trust under section 12A not taxable and...
![Corpus Contributions to Section 12A Registered Trust Not Taxable, Treated as Capital Receipts: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ITAT-ITAT-Ahmedabad-Corpus-donation-not-taxable-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Corpus Contributions to Section 12A Registered Trust Not Taxable, Treated as Capital Receipts: ITAT [Read Order]")
Inadequate Opportunity of hearing: ITAT restores addition due to Delayed ITR filing matter for fresh adjudication [Read Order]
The Cochin Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) restored the matter to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication, holding that the assessee was not afforded sufficient opportunity of hearing in...
![Inadequate Opportunity of hearing: ITAT restores addition due to Delayed ITR filing matter for fresh adjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ITAT-ITAT-Cochin-ITR-filing-ITAT-restores-ITR-addition-TAXSCAN.webp "Inadequate Opportunity of hearing: ITAT restores addition due to Delayed ITR filing matter for fresh adjudication [Read Order]")
Income Tax Returns: CBDT notifies ITR Form 6 for AY 2025-26, Know Complete Changes Here [Read Notification]
The Central Board of Direct Taxes ( CBDT ) has issued the revised Income Tax Return Form 6 ( ITR-6 ) for AY 2025-26 by Notification No. 44/2025 dated 06.05.2025. The new form has incorporated the...
![Income Tax Returns: CBDT notifies ITR Form 6 for AY 2025-26, Know Complete Changes Here [Read Notification]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Income-Tax-Returns-ITR-Form-6-Know-Complete-Changes-Here-taxscan.jpg "Income Tax Returns: CBDT notifies ITR Form 6 for AY 2025-26, Know Complete Changes Here [Read Notification]")
GST S. 75(5) Provides for Maximum Three Adjournments, Not Necessarily Three Hearings: Delhi HC in Fraudulent ITC Case [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Delhi High Court has clarified that under the Section 75(5) of the Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) Act, 2017 merely sets a ceiling of three adjournments in assessment...
![GST S. 75(5) Provides for Maximum Three Adjournments, Not Necessarily Three Hearings: Delhi HC in Fraudulent ITC Case [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/GST-Delhi-High-Court-ITC-taxscan.jpg "GST S. 75(5) Provides for Maximum Three Adjournments, Not Necessarily Three Hearings: Delhi HC in Fraudulent ITC Case [Read Order]")
