![Refund Once Granted Cannot Be Recovered via SCN Unless Proper Appeal u/s 35E of Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/refund-site-img.jpg "Refund Once Granted Cannot Be Recovered via SCN Unless Proper Appeal u/s 35E of Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Refund Once Granted Cannot Be Recovered via SCN Unless Proper Appeal u/s 35E of Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that a refund once sanctioned cannot be recovered...
![Genuineness of Loans u/s 68: ITAT Orders Fresh Verification of Creditworthiness and Transactions [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Creditworthiness-of-Parties-and-Genuineness-of-Transaction-Genuineness-of-Transaction-ITAT-Upholds-Addition-ITAT-Addition-Taxscan.jpg "Genuineness of Loans u/s 68: ITAT Orders Fresh Verification of Creditworthiness and Transactions [Read Order]")
![Validity of Share Premium Valuation u/s 56(2)(viib): ITAT Deletes AOs Addition, Accepts DCF Method [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ITAT-Income-Addition-Income-Tax-taxscan.jpg "Validity of Share Premium Valuation u/s 56(2)(viib): ITAT Deletes AOs Addition, Accepts DCF Method [Read Order]")
![Justice B.R. Gavai to Succeed Justice Sanjiv Khanna as 52nd Chief Justice of India: Law Ministry Notifies [Read Notification]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Justice-B.R.-Gavai-Indias-52nd-Chief-Justice-taxscan.jpg "Justice B.R. Gavai to Succeed Justice Sanjiv Khanna as 52nd Chief Justice of India: Law Ministry Notifies [Read Notification]")
![Rs.14.93 Crores Addition u/s 68 for Share Capital Premium: ITAT Deletes AOs Addition, Upholds Genuineness of Funds [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Bombay-HC-Interest-Expenditure-Interest-Free-Surplus-Fund-Investment-TAXSCAN.jpg "Rs.14.93 Crores Addition u/s 68 for Share Capital Premium: ITAT Deletes AOs Addition, Upholds Genuineness of Funds [Read Order]")
Dispute Amount Paid as Excise Duty Under Protest After Clearance of Goods is Not Covered by Unjust Enrichment: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has ruled that the contested amount paid as excise duty under protest is not covered by unjust enrichment because it...
![Dispute Amount Paid as Excise Duty Under Protest After Clearance of Goods is Not Covered by Unjust Enrichment: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Clearance-of-Goods-site-img.jpg "Dispute Amount Paid as Excise Duty Under Protest After Clearance of Goods is Not Covered by Unjust Enrichment: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Relief for Huawei: CESTAT Rules Corporate Guarantee not Taxable under Service Tax in Absence of Consideration [Read Order]
The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that a corporate guarantee extended by an associated enterprise without any consideration is not taxable...
![Relief for Huawei: CESTAT Rules Corporate Guarantee not Taxable under Service Tax in Absence of Consideration [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Relief-Huawei-CESTAT-Corporate-Guarantee-Taxable-Service-Tax-Absence-of-Consideration-taxscan.jpg "Relief for Huawei: CESTAT Rules Corporate Guarantee not Taxable under Service Tax in Absence of Consideration [Read Order]")
Consultancy Services to a Foreign University/Foreign Group Entity does not fall under “Intermediary Services”: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that consultancy services to the foreign university/foreign group entity do not fall under the category of...
![Consultancy Services to a Foreign University/Foreign Group Entity does not fall under “Intermediary Services”: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Foreign-University-site-img.jpg "Consultancy Services to a Foreign University/Foreign Group Entity does not fall under “Intermediary Services”: CESTAT [Read Order]")
V-Guard Receives ₹1.24 Crore GST Demand Orders for Alleged Non-Generation of E-Way Bills on Credit Notes
V-Guard Industries Ltd., a leading consumer electricals company, has reported that it received two separate GST demand orders from the Commercial Tax Officer, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu. The combined tax...
Validity of GST Pre-Deposit made from ECRL: Allahabad HC remands Matter to Commissioner of Appeals [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Allahabad High Court has quashed an order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) under the Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) Act, dismissing an appeal on the ground of...
![Validity of GST Pre-Deposit made from ECRL: Allahabad HC remands Matter to Commissioner of Appeals [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Validity-GST-Pre-Deposit-ECRL-Allahabad-HC-Commissioner-of-Appeals-taxscan.jpg "Validity of GST Pre-Deposit made from ECRL: Allahabad HC remands Matter to Commissioner of Appeals [Read Order]")
Supreme Court Upholds Demand Notice u/s 8 IBC on Corporate Debtor's Key Managerial Personnel [Read Judgement]
The Supreme Court upheld the delivery of a demand notice under Section 8 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“IBC”) to the corporate debtor's Key Managerial Personnel (KMP), stating that the...
![Supreme Court Upholds Demand Notice u/s 8 IBC on Corporate Debtors Key Managerial Personnel [Read Judgement]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Supreme-Court-Supreme-Court-Upholds-Demand-Notice-Section-8-IBC-TAXSCAN.jpg "Supreme Court Upholds Demand Notice u/s 8 IBC on Corporate Debtors Key Managerial Personnel [Read Judgement]")