![Cenvat Credits Applicability of Jindal Stainless Ltd on Input used for Electricity generated and sold to HSEB: Punjab and Haryana HC Remands matter to CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/CESTAT-Cenvat-.jpg "Cenvat Credits Applicability of Jindal Stainless Ltd on Input used for Electricity generated and sold to HSEB: Punjab and Haryana HC Remands matter to CESTAT [Read Order]")
Cenvat Credits Applicability of Jindal Stainless Ltd on Input used for Electricity generated and sold to HSEB: Punjab and Haryana HC Remands matter to CESTAT [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has remanded the issue on applicability of cenvat credit in case of Jindal steel Ltd on the...
![S. 143 Assessment Void Ab Initio: ITAT Rules AO Misapplied Jurisdiction Despite Satisfaction Note u/s 153C [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Assessment-Void-Ab-Initio-_-TAXSCAN.webp "S. 143 Assessment Void Ab Initio: ITAT Rules AO Misapplied Jurisdiction Despite Satisfaction Note u/s 153C [Read Order]")
![CIT(A) grants Relief on Interest Disallowance for Advances to Sister Concerns: ITAT Orders Verification of Funds Flow [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Disallowance-interest-ITAT-TAXSCAN-2.jpg "CIT(A) grants Relief on Interest Disallowance for Advances to Sister Concerns: ITAT Orders Verification of Funds Flow [Read Order]")
![Customs Dept Fails to issue SCN in Time: Delhi HC Directs Release of Gold Seized from Minor at IGI Airport [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/CESTAT-SEZ-Act-No-Confiscation-of-Seized-Gold-Merely-LOA-Special-Economic-Zone-Noida-Special-Economic-Zone-NSEZ-DTA-Domestic-Tariff-Area-Allahabad-Bench-of-the-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg "Customs Dept Fails to issue SCN in Time: Delhi HC Directs Release of Gold Seized from Minor at IGI Airport [Read Order]")
![Cenvat Credit on Transitional period Under GST Not Allowable on Capital Goods Received After July 1, 2017: Patna HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/CENVAT-Credit-TAXSCAN.jpg "Cenvat Credit on Transitional period Under GST Not Allowable on Capital Goods Received After July 1, 2017: Patna HC [Read Order]")
Additional Penalty u/s 125 Not applicable When Late Fees Levied for Non-Filing or Delayed Filing of GST Returns: Madras HC [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has held that an additional penalty under section 125 of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) is not applicable when late fees are levied for non-filing or delayed filing of GST...
![Additional Penalty u/s 125 Not applicable When Late Fees Levied for Non-Filing or Delayed Filing of GST Returns: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Additional-Penalty-Penalty-Late-Fees-Levied-for-Non-Filing-Non-Filing-or-Delayed-Filing-taxscan.jpg "Additional Penalty u/s 125 Not applicable When Late Fees Levied for Non-Filing or Delayed Filing of GST Returns: Madras HC [Read Order]")
Rule 8 of Central Excise Valuation Rules Inapplicable Where there is No Sale or Captive Consumption: CESTAT in BSNL case [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that Rule 8 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000, is inapplicable in cases where there is neither a...
![Rule 8 of Central Excise Valuation Rules Inapplicable Where there is No Sale or Captive Consumption: CESTAT in BSNL case [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Relief-to-BSNL-BSNL-CESTAT-Quashes-Demand-of-Service-Tax-on-Telecom-Services-CESTAT-Demand-of-Service-Tax-Service-Tax-Telecom-Services-Service-Tax-Rules-TAxscan.jpg "Rule 8 of Central Excise Valuation Rules Inapplicable Where there is No Sale or Captive Consumption: CESTAT in BSNL case [Read Order]")
Calcutta HC grants Businessman Bail in Rs. 37.29 Cr GST Input Tax Credit Case based on Toll Data [Read Order]
In a significant development that underscores judicial vigilance over the use of arrest powers under tax laws, the Calcutta High Court granted bail on April 17, 2025, to Santosh Kumar Sah, a...
![Calcutta HC grants Businessman Bail in Rs. 37.29 Cr GST Input Tax Credit Case based on Toll Data [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Calcutta-HC-Calcutta-HC-grants-Businessman-Bail-Businessman-Bail-GST-taxscan.jpg "Calcutta HC grants Businessman Bail in Rs. 37.29 Cr GST Input Tax Credit Case based on Toll Data [Read Order]")
Bogus Purchases of ₹2.5 Crore: ITAT applies 4% GP Rate citing Taxpayer’s Declared Profit [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)], which restricted the addition on account of bogus purchases to 4%...
![Bogus Purchases of ₹2.5 Crore: ITAT applies 4% GP Rate citing Taxpayer’s Declared Profit [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/ITAT-Disputed-purchases-Labour-Expenses-Alleqed-Boqus-Purchases-taxscan.jpg "Bogus Purchases of ₹2.5 Crore: ITAT applies 4% GP Rate citing Taxpayer’s Declared Profit [Read Order]")
Religious Objects must be Assessed under 5% Expenditure Rule: ITAT restores 80G Application [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) restored the matter for fresh adjudication which is to be assessed at 5% Expenditure rule in a case where the Commissioner of Income...
![Religious Objects must be Assessed under 5% Expenditure Rule: ITAT restores 80G Application [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/ITAT-ITAT-Ahmedabad-ITAT-on-80G-application-TAXSCAN.jpg "Religious Objects must be Assessed under 5% Expenditure Rule: ITAT restores 80G Application [Read Order]")
Penalty u/s 270A for Misreporting without Proper Charge Specification Invalid: ITAT Deletes Rs. 38.05 Lakh Penalty [Read Order]
The Bangalore Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT)deleted the penalty of Rs. 38.05 lakh imposed on the assessee due to the failure of the Assessing Officer (AO) to clearly specify the...
![Penalty u/s 270A for Misreporting without Proper Charge Specification Invalid: ITAT Deletes Rs. 38.05 Lakh Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Penalty-Penalty-Section-270A-Misreporting-without-Proper-Charge-Specification-Invalid-Proper-Charge-Specification-taxscan.jpg "Penalty u/s 270A for Misreporting without Proper Charge Specification Invalid: ITAT Deletes Rs. 38.05 Lakh Penalty [Read Order]")
![Supreme Court & High Courts Weekly Round-up [April 12th to April 18th,2025]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Supreme-Court-High-Courts-Weekly-Round-up.jpg "Supreme Court & High Courts Weekly Round-up [April 12th to April 18th,2025]")