![Bonafide Error in Claiming 15% Depreciation Instead of 7.5%: ITAT finds Assessee Eligible for Additional Depreciation u/s 32(1)(iia) [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/10/500x300_2075264-bonafide-error-bonafide-error-in-claiming-15-depreciation-taxscan.webp "Bonafide Error in Claiming 15% Depreciation Instead of 7.5%: ITAT finds Assessee Eligible for Additional Depreciation u/s 32(1)(iia) [Read Order]")
Bonafide Error in Claiming 15% Depreciation Instead of 7.5%: ITAT finds Assessee Eligible for Additional Depreciation u/s 32(1)(iia) [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) held that a bonafide error in claiming 15% depreciation instead of the eligible 7.5%...
![Legal Heir Cannot Be Expected to Explain Unexplained Bank Credits of Deceased: ITAT notes AO fails to Verify Sources, Deletes Penalty [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/10/250x150_2075254-legal-heir-explain-unexplained-bank-credits-unexplained-bank-credits-taxscan.webp "Legal Heir Cannot Be Expected to Explain Unexplained Bank Credits of Deceased: ITAT notes AO fails to Verify Sources, Deletes Penalty [Read Order]")
![Surcharge on Private Discretionary Trust Income: ITAT Applies 15% Rate as Income Does Not Exceed ₹2 Crores [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/10/250x150_2075243-surcharge-on-private-discretionary-private-discretionary-taxscan.webp "Surcharge on Private Discretionary Trust Income: ITAT Applies 15% Rate as Income Does Not Exceed ₹2 Crores [Read Order]")
![SBN Deposits Not Unexplained Income: ITAT Deletes ₹ 17.16 Lakh Addition u/s 69A, Holds Demonetization Deposits Valid Until 31.12.2016 [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/10/250x150_2075225-sbn-deposits-sbn-deposits-not-unexplained-income-taxscan.webp "SBN Deposits Not Unexplained Income: ITAT Deletes ₹ 17.16 Lakh Addition u/s 69A, Holds Demonetization Deposits Valid Until 31.12.2016 [Read Order]")
![SEBI Revises Framework for Conversion of Private Listed InvIT into Public InvIT [Read Circular]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/10/250x150_2075207-sebi-sebi-revises-framework-for-conversion-taxscan.webp "SEBI Revises Framework for Conversion of Private Listed InvIT into Public InvIT [Read Circular]")
Logistical and Financial Difficulties Not Enough to Excuse 172-Day Delay in Refiling: NCLAT [Read Order]
The Principal New Delhi Bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) ruled that logistical and financial difficulties are not enough to excuse a 172-day delay in refiling an appeal....
![Logistical and Financial Difficulties Not Enough to Excuse 172-Day Delay in Refiling: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/10/500x300_2075145-logistical-and-financial-difficulties-financial-difficulties-not-enough-to-excuse-delay-in-refiling-taxscan.webp "Logistical and Financial Difficulties Not Enough to Excuse 172-Day Delay in Refiling: NCLAT [Read Order]")
Factual Dispute on Custody Legal or Proper in Gold Smuggling Case not for Writ Jurisdiction: Telangana HC Directs to Remedy under BNSS [Read Order]
The Telangana High Court has declined to entertain a writ petition challenging the custody of the petitioner’s husband in a gold smuggling case, ruling that disputed questions of fact regarding the...
![Factual Dispute on Custody Legal or Proper in Gold Smuggling Case not for Writ Jurisdiction: Telangana HC Directs to Remedy under BNSS [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/10/500x300_2075131-factual-dispute-on-custody-legal-custody-legal-or-proper-in-gold-smuggling-case-taxscan.webp "Factual Dispute on Custody Legal or Proper in Gold Smuggling Case not for Writ Jurisdiction: Telangana HC Directs to Remedy under BNSS [Read Order]")
Wrong Tax Head Entry Not Ground for Denying CGST Refund: Allahabad HC Rejects Appellate Authority’s Technical Approach [Read Order]
The Allahabad High Court has held that a refund claim for Central GST ( CGST ) cannot be rejected merely because the amount was entered under the wrong tax head in the refund form. The Court...
![Wrong Tax Head Entry Not Ground for Denying CGST Refund: Allahabad HC Rejects Appellate Authority’s Technical Approach [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/10/500x300_2075118-wrong-tax-head-entry-tax-head-entry-taxscan.webp "Wrong Tax Head Entry Not Ground for Denying CGST Refund: Allahabad HC Rejects Appellate Authority’s Technical Approach [Read Order]")
Uttarakhand HC Dismisses GST Waiver & TDS Deduction Plea, Says Liability Determination Requires Factual Inquiry Beyond Writ Jurisdiction [Read Order]
The Uttarakhand High Court has dismissed a writ petition seeking GST ( Goods and Services Tax ) waiver benefits and a direction to prevent deduction of GST and TDS under Sections 22 and 51(1)(d) of...
![Uttarakhand HC Dismisses GST Waiver & TDS Deduction Plea, Says Liability Determination Requires Factual Inquiry Beyond Writ Jurisdiction [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/10/500x300_2075103-uttarakhand-hc-uttarakhand-hc-dismisses-gst-waiver-tds-deduction-plea-taxscan.webp "Uttarakhand HC Dismisses GST Waiver & TDS Deduction Plea, Says Liability Determination Requires Factual Inquiry Beyond Writ Jurisdiction [Read Order]")
Sourav Ganguly’s GST Appeal Reinstated: Calcutta HC Terms Further Pre-Deposit Demand a ‘Travesty of Justice’ After Excess Amount Already Recovered [Read Order]
The Calcutta High Court has restored former cricketer Sourav Ganguly’s GST ( Goods and Services Tax ) appeal, quashing the appellate authority’s order dated 30 July 2024 that had rejected the...
![Sourav Ganguly’s GST Appeal Reinstated: Calcutta HC Terms Further Pre-Deposit Demand a ‘Travesty of Justice’ After Excess Amount Already Recovered [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/10/500x300_2075087-gangulys-gst-appeal-reinstated-gst-appeal-taxscan.webp "Sourav Ganguly’s GST Appeal Reinstated: Calcutta HC Terms Further Pre-Deposit Demand a ‘Travesty of Justice’ After Excess Amount Already Recovered [Read Order]")
![GST Adjudication Without Mandatory Hearing u/s 75(4) Unsustainable: Calcutta HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/10/500x300_2075069-gst-adjudication-gst-gst-adjudication-without-mandatory-hearing-taxscan.webp "GST Adjudication Without Mandatory Hearing u/s 75(4) Unsustainable: Calcutta HC [Read Order]")
Non-Intimation by Tax Practitioner Causes Appeal Delay: ITAT Condones 1249-Day Delay, Quashes Revision u/s 263 Initiated on AO's Proposal [Read Order]
The Bangalore Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) has granted relief to a taxpayer by condoning a delay of 1,249 days in filing appeals for AY 2015-16, noting that part of the delay...
![Non-Intimation by Tax Practitioner Causes Appeal Delay: ITAT Condones 1249-Day Delay, Quashes Revision u/s 263 Initiated on AOs Proposal [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/09/500x300_2074942-non-intimation-tax-practitioner-causes-appeal-delay-itat-condones-delay-quashes-revision-us-263-proposal-taxscan.webp "Non-Intimation by Tax Practitioner Causes Appeal Delay: ITAT Condones 1249-Day Delay, Quashes Revision u/s 263 Initiated on AOs Proposal [Read Order]")