NFRA's Proposal for New Accounting Standards for Foreign Companies
In order to guarantee that financial statements of companies are more accurate and transparent regarding investments and transactions in foreign...
![Execution of Penalties under Consumer Protection Act can still be carried out despite IBC moratorium: Supreme Court [Read Judgement]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Supreme-Court-Consumer-Protection-Act-IBC-CP-act-taxsacn.jpg "Execution of Penalties under Consumer Protection Act can still be carried out despite IBC moratorium: Supreme Court [Read Judgement]")
![Bombay HC upholds Addition on Bogus Purchase u/s 69C of Income Tax Act in Absence of Explanation on Source [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Bombay-HC-Addition-on-Bogus-Purchase-Income-Tax-Act-Absence-of-Explanation-Source-taxscan.jpg "Bombay HC upholds Addition on Bogus Purchase u/s 69C of Income Tax Act in Absence of Explanation on Source [Read Order]")
Relief to Appolo Tyres: CESTAT Restores Rs. 28.1 Lakh Service Tax Refund Claim due to GST Transition Hurdles [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has restored Apollo Tyres' claim for a refund of Rs. 28.1 lakh in service tax, citing challenges arising from the...
![Relief to Appolo Tyres: CESTAT Restores Rs. 28.1 Lakh Service Tax Refund Claim due to GST Transition Hurdles [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Relief-to-Appolo-Tyres-Appolo-Tyres-CESTAT-CESTAT-Restores-Service-Tax-Service-Tax-Refund-Claim-GST-Transition-Hurdles-GST-Transition-taxscan.jpg "Relief to Appolo Tyres: CESTAT Restores Rs. 28.1 Lakh Service Tax Refund Claim due to GST Transition Hurdles [Read Order]")
![Cross-Objections not Maintainable u/s 260A of Income Tax Act: Delhi High Court [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Delhi-High-Court-Income-Tax-Act-Cross-Objections-taxscan-.jpg "Cross-Objections not Maintainable u/s 260A of Income Tax Act: Delhi High Court [Read Order]")
Reassessment u/s 147 Requires Fresh Tangible Material, Mere Reliance on Investigation Report Insufficient: ITAT [Read Order]
The Surat Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled that reassessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, must be based on fresh tangible material and that reliance solely on...
![Reassessment u/s 147 Requires Fresh Tangible Material, Mere Reliance on Investigation Report Insufficient: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Reassessment-.jpg "Reassessment u/s 147 Requires Fresh Tangible Material, Mere Reliance on Investigation Report Insufficient: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Supreme Court & High Courts Weekly Round-up [March 1st to March 7th,2025]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Supreme-Court-and-High-Court-Weekly-Round-Up-taxscan.jpg "Supreme Court & High Courts Weekly Round-up [March 1st to March 7th,2025]")
No Seizure Extension Notice Provided before Conclusion of Six-Month Period: Delhi HC Orders Release of Spectacles and Frames [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court has ruled that the GST Department’s failure to issue a notice before extending the seizure period beyond six months invalidates the continued retention of goods, while ordering...
![No Seizure Extension Notice Provided before Conclusion of Six-Month Period: Delhi HC Orders Release of Spectacles and Frames [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/No-Seizure-Extension-Notice-Provided-Conclusion-Six-Month-Period-Delhi-HC-Orders-Spectacles-and-Frames-taxscan.jpg "No Seizure Extension Notice Provided before Conclusion of Six-Month Period: Delhi HC Orders Release of Spectacles and Frames [Read Order]")