![Issuing 4 Years consolidated notice is impermissible: Bombay HC Stays Rs. 71.23 Crore GST Demand [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/consolidated-notice-consolidated-notice-is-impermissible-Bombay-HC-GST-Demand-GST-notice-is-impermissible-taxscan.jpg "Issuing 4 Years consolidated notice is impermissible: Bombay HC Stays Rs. 71.23 Crore GST Demand [Read Order]")
Issuing 4 Years consolidated notice is impermissible: Bombay HC Stays Rs. 71.23 Crore GST Demand [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court has stayed Rs. 71.23 Crore Goods and Service Tax (GST) demand holding that issuing 4 years consolidated notice. Respondent...
![Supreme Court Criticizes NCLAT’s Long Order on Delay Condonation Application Despite High Pendency of Cases [Read Judgement]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Supreme-Court-NCLAT-Supreme-Court-Criticizes-NCLAT-taxscan.jpg "Supreme Court Criticizes NCLAT’s Long Order on Delay Condonation Application Despite High Pendency of Cases [Read Judgement]")
![No Service Tax on Freight & Cartage Expenses under GTA Services: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/No-Service-Tax-Service-Tax-No-Service-Tax-on-Freight-Cartage-Expenses-Freight-Cartage-Expenses-Freight-Cartage-Expenses-Under-GTA-Services-GTA-Services-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "No Service Tax on Freight & Cartage Expenses under GTA Services: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Execution of Penalties under Consumer Protection Act can still be carried out despite IBC moratorium: Supreme Court [Read Judgement]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Supreme-Court-Consumer-Protection-Act-IBC-CP-act-taxsacn.jpg "Execution of Penalties under Consumer Protection Act can still be carried out despite IBC moratorium: Supreme Court [Read Judgement]")
Gujarat HC Order Revenue to Pay 6% Interest on Delayed Refund of ₹2 Crore under Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Scheme 2020 [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Gujarat High Court directed the Income Tax Department to pay 6% interest per annum for a period of 20 months on the delayed refund of ₹2,20,41,042 under the Direct Tax Vivad...
Bombay HC upholds Addition on Bogus Purchase u/s 69C of Income Tax Act in Absence of Explanation on Source [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court has upheld the addition on bogus purchase under Section 69 C of the Income Tax Act,1961 as the respondent-assessee failed to prove the genuineness of the purchases. Kanak...
![Bombay HC upholds Addition on Bogus Purchase u/s 69C of Income Tax Act in Absence of Explanation on Source [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Bombay-HC-Addition-on-Bogus-Purchase-Income-Tax-Act-Absence-of-Explanation-Source-taxscan.jpg "Bombay HC upholds Addition on Bogus Purchase u/s 69C of Income Tax Act in Absence of Explanation on Source [Read Order]")
Relief to Appolo Tyres: CESTAT Restores Rs. 28.1 Lakh Service Tax Refund Claim due to GST Transition Hurdles [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has restored Apollo Tyres' claim for a refund of Rs. 28.1 lakh in service tax, citing challenges arising from the...
![Relief to Appolo Tyres: CESTAT Restores Rs. 28.1 Lakh Service Tax Refund Claim due to GST Transition Hurdles [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Relief-to-Appolo-Tyres-Appolo-Tyres-CESTAT-CESTAT-Restores-Service-Tax-Service-Tax-Refund-Claim-GST-Transition-Hurdles-GST-Transition-taxscan.jpg "Relief to Appolo Tyres: CESTAT Restores Rs. 28.1 Lakh Service Tax Refund Claim due to GST Transition Hurdles [Read Order]")
![Cross-Objections not Maintainable u/s 260A of Income Tax Act: Delhi High Court [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Delhi-High-Court-Income-Tax-Act-Cross-Objections-taxscan-.jpg "Cross-Objections not Maintainable u/s 260A of Income Tax Act: Delhi High Court [Read Order]")
Reassessment u/s 147 Requires Fresh Tangible Material, Mere Reliance on Investigation Report Insufficient: ITAT [Read Order]
The Surat Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled that reassessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, must be based on fresh tangible material and that reliance solely on...
![Reassessment u/s 147 Requires Fresh Tangible Material, Mere Reliance on Investigation Report Insufficient: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Reassessment-.jpg "Reassessment u/s 147 Requires Fresh Tangible Material, Mere Reliance on Investigation Report Insufficient: ITAT [Read Order]")
