![NCLT Orders Liquidation of Go Airlines (India) Limited [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/NCLT-NCLT-Orders-Liquidation-Go-Airlines-Go-Airlines-India-National-Company-Law-Tribunal-NCLT-New-Delhi-Bench-Corporate-Corporate-Debtor-Taxscan.jpg "NCLT Orders Liquidation of Go Airlines (India) Limited [Read Order]")
NCLT Orders Liquidation of Go Airlines (India) Limited [Read Order]
The New Delhi Bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has ordered the liquidation of Go First Airlines, marking the conclusion of a...
![Non-appearance due to COVID pandemic: ITAT quashes exparte order citing sufficient ground for non-compliance [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/ITAT-COVID-pandemic-non-compliance-taxscan.jpg "Non-appearance due to COVID pandemic: ITAT quashes exparte order citing sufficient ground for non-compliance [Read Order]")
![ITAT Quashes PCIT’s Revision Order on Alleged Bogus Purchases Citing AO’s Plausible View Backed by ITO Report and VAT Returns [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/ITAT-ITAT-Quashes-PCITs-PCITs-Revision-Order-Revision-Order-Bogus-Purchases-AOs-Plausible-View-ITO-Report-VAT-Returns-taxscan.jpg "ITAT Quashes PCIT’s Revision Order on Alleged Bogus Purchases Citing AO’s Plausible View Backed by ITO Report and VAT Returns [Read Order]")
![Service Tax SCN turns Invalid if Assessee Paid Tax Liability Along with Interest before issuance of SCN: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/CESTAT-Ahmedabad-GST-GST-turns-SCN-under-GST-Taxscan.jpg "Service Tax SCN turns Invalid if Assessee Paid Tax Liability Along with Interest before issuance of SCN: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Authorised Signatories/Employees of Company not liable to GST Penalty u/s 122(1-A) and 137: Supreme Court in Maersk GST Fraud Case [Read Judgement]
In a notable ruling, the Supreme Court of India ruled that the employees of a Company may not be attributed liability for Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) Penalty under Section 122(1-A) and Section 137...
![Authorised Signatories/Employees of Company not liable to GST Penalty u/s 122(1-A) and 137: Supreme Court in Maersk GST Fraud Case [Read Judgement]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Supreme-Court-Supreme-Court-of-India-Goods-and-Services-Tax-GST-Penalty-Section-1221-A-taxscan-1.jpg "Authorised Signatories/Employees of Company not liable to GST Penalty u/s 122(1-A) and 137: Supreme Court in Maersk GST Fraud Case [Read Judgement]")
![Claims u/s 11E of Central Excise Act does not Amount to Secured Debt: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Central-Excise-Act-NCLAT-New-Delhi-National-Company-Law-Appellate-Tribunal-NCLAT-IBC-operational-debt-NCLTs-resolution-plan-Reliance-Taxscan.jpg "Claims u/s 11E of Central Excise Act does not Amount to Secured Debt: NCLAT [Read Order]")
![[BREAKING] Introduction of E-Way Bill (EWB) for Gold in Kerala State; GSTN issues Advisory](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/E-Way-Bill-GSTN-Goods-and-Services-Tax-Network-E-Way-Bill-for-Gold-in-Kerala-TAXSCAN.jpg "[BREAKING] Introduction of E-Way Bill (EWB) for Gold in Kerala State; GSTN issues Advisory")
Relief to Axis Bank: CESTAT Allows CENVAT Credit on Tax Paid on Premium Mandatorily Required for Functioning as Bank [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has granted Axis Bank CENVAT Credit on taxes paid on premiums that are necessary for banks to operate. M/s Axis...
![Relief to Axis Bank: CESTAT Allows CENVAT Credit on Tax Paid on Premium Mandatorily Required for Functioning as Bank [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Axis-Bank-Insurance-Premium-Mandatory-Compliance-Regulatory-Requirement-Banking-Operations-Input-Services-Nexus-with-Output-Services-Judicial-Precedent-Financial-Institutions-CESTAT-Mumbai-taxscan.jpg "Relief to Axis Bank: CESTAT Allows CENVAT Credit on Tax Paid on Premium Mandatorily Required for Functioning as Bank [Read Order]")
Appeal Delayed Beyond 15 Days Not Condonable as Per Proviso of Section 61(2) of IBC: NCLAT refuses to Condone 19 Days Delay by Kotak Mahindra [Read Order]
In a recent ruling , the New Delhi bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has held that delay in filing an appeal beyond 15 days as per section 61(2) proviso of the Insolvency...
![Appeal Delayed Beyond 15 Days Not Condonable as Per Proviso of Section 61(2) of IBC: NCLAT refuses to Condone 19 Days Delay by Kotak Mahindra [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Appeal-Delayed-Condonable-as-Per-Proviso-Per-Proviso-Section-612-of-IBC-IBC-NCLAT-NCLAT-refuses-NCLAT-refuses-to-Condone-Kotak-Mahindra-taxscan.jpg "Appeal Delayed Beyond 15 Days Not Condonable as Per Proviso of Section 61(2) of IBC: NCLAT refuses to Condone 19 Days Delay by Kotak Mahindra [Read Order]")