![Flavored Milk falls under Tariff Head Milk and cream, concentrated or containing added sugar or other sweetening matter: AP HC Rejects Tax Evasion Penalty[Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/GST-Tariff-GST-Tariff-Heading-0402-Andhra-Pradesh-HC-Taxscan.jpg "Flavored Milk falls under Tariff Head Milk and cream, concentrated or containing added sugar or other sweetening matter: AP HC Rejects Tax Evasion Penalty[Read Order]")
Flavored Milk falls under Tariff Head "Milk and cream, concentrated or containing added sugar or other sweetening matter": AP HC Rejects Tax Evasion Penalty[Read Order]
The Andhra Pradesh High Court, in a recent decision held that flavuored milk comes under GST Tariff Heading 0402 and deleted a tax evasion penalty. ...
![Unexplained Cash Deposit of ₹6.5 Lakh during Demonetization: ITAT Remands Case for fresh [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Demonetization-Unexplained-Cash-Deposit-ITAT-Remands-Case-taxscan.jpg "Unexplained Cash Deposit of ₹6.5 Lakh during Demonetization: ITAT Remands Case for fresh [Read Order]")
![CIT(A) Ignored CBDT Relief for Delayed ITR Filing: ITAT Remands Matter Back for Order Rectification [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Chennai-Bench-of-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Central-Board-of-Direct-Taxes-CIT-CBDT-Relief-for-Delayed-ITR-Filing-ITR-Filing-ITAT-Remands-Matter-CBDT-CPC-return-of-income-and-audit-report-ITR-Taxscan.jpg "CIT(A) Ignored CBDT Relief for Delayed ITR Filing: ITAT Remands Matter Back for Order Rectification [Read Order]")
![Cross Empowerment: Kerala HC upholds State GST Officers Authority to issue Notices under CGST Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Cross-Empowerment-Kerala-HC-Kerala-HC-upholds-State-GST-Officers-GST-issue-Notices-issue-Notices-under-CGST-Act-CGST-Act-taxscan.jpg "Cross Empowerment: Kerala HC upholds State GST Officers Authority to issue Notices under CGST Act [Read Order]")
![CBIC Excludes GST on Renting of Immovable Property under RCM for Composition Taxpayers [Read Notification]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/CBIC-GST-on-Renting-GST-Renting-of-Immovable-Property-Immovable-Property-RCM-Goods-and-Services-Tax-taxscan.jpg "CBIC Excludes GST on Renting of Immovable Property under RCM for Composition Taxpayers [Read Notification]")
Commissioner Denies Cross-Examination Opportunity: CESTAT Quashes Excise Demand Order for Violation of S. 9D of CEA [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) Quashed the order of the commissioner for denying cross-examination opportunity citing that it is in violation of...
![Commissioner Denies Cross-Examination Opportunity: CESTAT Quashes Excise Demand Order for Violation of S. 9D of CEA [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Excise-Demand-Order-Kolkata-Bench-of-CESTAT-cross-examination-opportunity-citing-Excise-Duty-and-imposed-penalties-Customs-Customs-Excise-and-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Taxscan.jpg "Commissioner Denies Cross-Examination Opportunity: CESTAT Quashes Excise Demand Order for Violation of S. 9D of CEA [Read Order]")
Deduction u/s 54F Allowable for Property Purchased in Wife's Name: ITAT Directs AO to Approve [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) directed the assessing officer (AO) to approve the deduction under section 54F of the Income Tax Act for the property purchased in the wife’s...
![Deduction u/s 54F Allowable for Property Purchased in Wifes Name: ITAT Directs AO to Approve [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/ITAT-ITAT-Directs-AO-ITAT-Directs-ITR-CIT-Delhi-High-Court-under-section-54F-of-the-Income-Tax-Act-immovable-property-AO-Taxscan.jpg "Deduction u/s 54F Allowable for Property Purchased in Wifes Name: ITAT Directs AO to Approve [Read Order]")
Procedural Lapse in ₹14.6 Cr Income Tax Dispute: ITAT directs Reassessment for NRI Taxpayer [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Bangalore bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) remanded the case back to the assessing officer (AO) in an appeal around the addition of ₹1.46 Cr, made on alleged...
![Procedural Lapse in ₹14.6 Cr Income Tax Dispute: ITAT directs Reassessment for NRI Taxpayer [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/NRI-Reassessment-for-NRI-Taxpayer-Procedural-Lapse-taxscan.jpg "Procedural Lapse in ₹14.6 Cr Income Tax Dispute: ITAT directs Reassessment for NRI Taxpayer [Read Order]")
Dept. Fails to Verify Document Veracity with Key Parties like Suppliers, Buyers, Transporters, Agents: CESTAT Rules Investigation Faulty [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled the investigation faulty due to the department failing to verify the veracity of documents with key parties like...
![Dept. Fails to Verify Document Veracity with Key Parties like Suppliers, Buyers, Transporters, Agents: CESTAT Rules Investigation Faulty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Dept.-Fails-to-Verify-Document-CESTAT-CESTAT-Rules-Investigation-Faulty-suppliers-buyers-transporters-agents-veracity-of-documents-show-cause-notice-supplier-of-raw-materials-Kolkata-Taxscan.jpg "Dept. Fails to Verify Document Veracity with Key Parties like Suppliers, Buyers, Transporters, Agents: CESTAT Rules Investigation Faulty [Read Order]")
Genuineness of ₹2.06 Crore Share Capital Received: ITAT Upholds CIT(A) Decision, Deletes Addition u/s 68 [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)[CIT(A)] decision, confirming the genuineness of ₹2.06 crore share capital received, and...
![Genuineness of ₹2.06 Crore Share Capital Received: ITAT Upholds CIT(A) Decision, Deletes Addition u/s 68 [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Genuineness-Share-Capital-Share-Capital-Received-ITAT-ITAT-Upholds-CITA-Decision-CITA-Deletes-Addition-taxscan.jpg "Genuineness of ₹2.06 Crore Share Capital Received: ITAT Upholds CIT(A) Decision, Deletes Addition u/s 68 [Read Order]")
Inability to find GST Adjudication Orders on Portal: Madras HC calls upon Phone Seller to Pay 25% of Disputed Tax [Read Order]
The Madras High Court recently directed a Phone Seller who claimed to be unable to locate Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) adjudication Orders against him on the online Portal to pay out 25% of the...
![Inability to find GST Adjudication Orders on Portal: Madras HC calls upon Phone Seller to Pay 25% of Disputed Tax [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Madras-High-Court-GST-GST-Adjudication-Orders-GST-orders-missing-on-portal-TAXSCAN.jpg "Inability to find GST Adjudication Orders on Portal: Madras HC calls upon Phone Seller to Pay 25% of Disputed Tax [Read Order]")
