![Sikkim HC Quashes GST Order Denying Budgetary Support of Rs. 59L to Zydus Wellness [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/25/500x300_2080329-zydus-wellness-gst-heinz-ip-taxscan.webp "Sikkim HC Quashes GST Order Denying Budgetary Support of Rs. 59L to Zydus Wellness [Read Order]")
Sikkim HC Quashes GST Order Denying Budgetary Support of Rs. 59L to Zydus Wellness [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the High Court of Sikkim quashed an order of the GST ( Goods and Services Tax) authorities that had denied the company budgetary...
![Duplicate GST Demand u/s 63 and 73 Issued for Same Period: Orissa HC declares writ Infructuous as Order Rectified to ‘Nil’ by Dept [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/25/250x150_2080331-gst-demand-.webp "Duplicate GST Demand u/s 63 and 73 Issued for Same Period: Orissa HC declares writ Infructuous as Order Rectified to ‘Nil’ by Dept [Read Order]")
![Taxpreparer files ITR-U showing Higher Income without Taxpayer’s Knowledge as OTP Shared: ITAT Remands for Verification [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/25/250x150_2080303-itr-u-higher-income-itat-taxscan.webp "Taxpreparer files ITR-U showing Higher Income without Taxpayer’s Knowledge as OTP Shared: ITAT Remands for Verification [Read Order]")
![Advance Receivables Qualify as Application of Income u/s 11(2): ITAT directs AO to accept Claim [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/25/250x150_2080285-income-itat-directs-claim-taxscan.webp "Advance Receivables Qualify as Application of Income u/s 11(2): ITAT directs AO to accept Claim [Read Order]")
![S. 69 and 70 under GST is not Violative of Article 20(3) or 21, Parliament Competent to Enact such Provisions: Delhi HC follows SC Ruling [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/25/250x150_2080294-gst-is-not-violative-article-203-or-21-parliament-competent-enact-such-provisions-delhi-hc-sc-ruling-taxscan.webp "S. 69 and 70 under GST is not Violative of Article 20(3) or 21, Parliament Competent to Enact such Provisions: Delhi HC follows SC Ruling [Read Order]")
Cash Deposits in Joint Account Declared in Wife’s ITR: ITAT Remits Matter as Individual Fails to Explain Source of Cash Deposits [Read Order]
The Pune Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) remitted a matter involving cash deposits of ₹14,89,425 in a joint bank account declared in the wife’s income-tax return (ITR) after the ...
![Cash Deposits in Joint Account Declared in Wife’s ITR: ITAT Remits Matter as Individual Fails to Explain Source of Cash Deposits [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/25/500x300_2080270-cash-deposits-joint-account-itr-itat-cash-deposits-taxscan.webp "Cash Deposits in Joint Account Declared in Wife’s ITR: ITAT Remits Matter as Individual Fails to Explain Source of Cash Deposits [Read Order]")
GST Rectification Order must be Passed by Same Authority that passed Original Order: Delhi HC [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court has clarified that rectification of a GST (Goods and Services Tax) order must be carried out by the same authority that passed the original order. A petition was filed by...
![GST Rectification Order must be Passed by Same Authority that passed Original Order: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/25/500x300_2080272-rectification-order.webp "GST Rectification Order must be Passed by Same Authority that passed Original Order: Delhi HC [Read Order]")
GST authorities unaware of Death of Assessee as Heir Continued to File Returns in Deceased’s Name: Gauhati HC order Fresh Proceedings against Legal Rep [Read Order]
The Gauhati High Court has quashed a GST (Goods and Services Tax) demand order issued in the name of a deceased assessee, holding that proceedings against a dead person are a nullity in law. At the...
![GST authorities unaware of Death of Assessee as Heir Continued to File Returns in Deceased’s Name: Gauhati HC order Fresh Proceedings against Legal Rep [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/25/500x300_2080261-gst-demand-order.webp "GST authorities unaware of Death of Assessee as Heir Continued to File Returns in Deceased’s Name: Gauhati HC order Fresh Proceedings against Legal Rep [Read Order]")
Vague Allegations of Defective Goods Not a Pre-Existing Dispute: NCLT Accepts Insolvency Petition and CIRP Initiated [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of the National Company LawTribunal (NCLT) admitted a Section 9 application after finding that vague allegations of defective goods did not amount to a pre-existing dispute and the ...
![Vague Allegations of Defective Goods Not a Pre-Existing Dispute: NCLT Accepts Insolvency Petition and CIRP Initiated [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/24/500x300_2080152-vague-allegations-defective-goods-pre-existing-dispute-nclt-insolvency-petition-cirp-initiated-taxscan.webp "Vague Allegations of Defective Goods Not a Pre-Existing Dispute: NCLT Accepts Insolvency Petition and CIRP Initiated [Read Order]")
Documentary Evidence like Court of Board Nominees Order, Bank statements Other than IU Records Sufficient to Establish Default Date: NCLT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the National CompanyLaw Tribunal (NCLT) clarified that the date of default can be established by placing reliance on documentary evidence other than a record of default with an...
![Documentary Evidence like Court of Board Nominees Order, Bank statements Other than IU Records Sufficient to Establish Default Date: NCLT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/24/500x300_2080145-documentary-evidence-board-nominees-order-bank-statements-iu-nclt-taxscan.webp "Documentary Evidence like Court of Board Nominees Order, Bank statements Other than IU Records Sufficient to Establish Default Date: NCLT [Read Order]")
Taxpayer Pursued Rectification Petition First: Madras HC Condones 108 Days Delay in Filing Appeal [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court condoned a delay of 108 days in filing an appeal under the TNGST Act, 2017, after observing that the taxpayer had first pursued a rectification petition ...
![Taxpayer Pursued Rectification Petition First: Madras HC Condones 108 Days Delay in Filing Appeal [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/24/500x300_2080136-taxpayer-rectification-petition-madras-hc-filing-appeal-taxscan.webp "Taxpayer Pursued Rectification Petition First: Madras HC Condones 108 Days Delay in Filing Appeal [Read Order]")