Top
Begin typing your search above and press return to search.

Income Tax Exemption to ICMAI Registered Valuers Organisation: ITAT asks Dept to re-consider Application [Read Order]

Income Tax Exemption to ICMAI Registered Valuers Organisation: ITAT asks Dept to re-consider Application [Read Order]
X

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Delhi), while considering an appeal filed by the ICMAI Registered Valuers Organisation, asked the income tax department to re-consider the application to allow registration under section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to the organization in order to get the benefits of the exemption. The main activities of the assessee includes “Providing...


The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Delhi), while considering an appeal filed by the ICMAI Registered Valuers Organisation, asked the income tax department to re-consider the application to allow registration under section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to the organization in order to get the benefits of the exemption.

The main activities of the assessee includes “Providing valuers course” to create skilled registered valuers in the country. It was contended that the fruits of various activities like training, seminars could be available to the public at large without any profit motive and for that purpose the assessee is registered u/s. 8 of the Companies Act, 2013 and is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Institute of Cost Accountant of India and registered with Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) framed with the objective of educating, regulating and monitoring the discipline of registered valuers. However, the application filed by the assessee under section 12AA was rejected by the assessee.

The assessee submitted before the Tribunal that the registration sought under section 12AA could not be denied to the assessee where on similar facts, various other organizations like ICAI registered valuers organization, Indian Institute of Insolvency Professionals of ICAI, ICSI Insolvency Professional agency, Practising Valuers Association of India carrying similar objects as that of assessee, have been duly granted registration.

Judicial Member Challa Nagendra Prasad and Accountant Member Mr. Pradip Kumar Kedia observed that the assessee has failed to respond to the requirements of the CIT(E) to enable him to appreciate the relevant facts for the purposes of registration.

“However, in the same vain, we simultaneously notice that the assessee has filed certain replies IN DAK before the CIT(E). On a reading of the impugned order, it appears that the CIT(E) has taken a view against the assessee unilaterally and without taking note of the main objects of the assessee as well as the decisions rendered in other cases placed in similar situation as claimed. The impugned order appears to be somewhat cryptic and requires elucidation on facts and law. We, therefore, deem it appropriate to restore the matter back to the file of the CIT(E) / other competent registering authority in force to examine matter denovo after taking cognizance of the factual position and contentions of the assessee. It shall be upon to the assessee to submit all relevant facts and its contentions before registering authority. The registering authority shall pass speaking order in accordance with law after taking note of the various submissions and contentions of the assessee,” the bench said.

To Read the full text of the Order CLICK HERE

Support our journalism by subscribing to Taxscan AdFree. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates.

Next Story

Related Stories

Advertisement
Advertisement
All Rights Reserved. Copyright @2019