ITAT Quashes Tax Assessments, Citing Mechanical and invalid approval under section 153D
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Delhi bench has quashed several tax assessments,ruling that a mechanical and arbitrary approval process...
![ITAT Condones Significant Appeal Delay for Elderly Directors Citing Health Concerns Due to Pandemic [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/14/250x150_2063772-itat-itat-condones-significant-appeal-delay-appeal-delay-appeal-delay-for-elderly-directors-taxscan.webp "ITAT Condones Significant Appeal Delay for Elderly Directors Citing Health Concerns Due to Pandemic [Read Order]")
![ITAT Rules Domain Registration and web Hosting not Royalty Income [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/14/250x150_2063754-itat-itat-rules-itat-rules-domain-registration-domain-registration-taxscan.webp "ITAT Rules Domain Registration and web Hosting not Royalty Income [Read Order]")
![ITAT Remands Ex Parte Tax and Penalty Appeals citing delays and denied opportunity [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/14/250x150_2063743-itat-itat-experte-order-taxscan.webp "ITAT Remands Ex Parte Tax and Penalty Appeals citing delays and denied opportunity [Read Order]")
![ITAT orders fresh hearing for Ex Parte dismissal of Agricultural Income Tax case [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/14/500x300_2063723-agricultural-income-tax-case-taxscan.webp "ITAT orders fresh hearing for Ex Parte dismissal of Agricultural Income Tax case [Read Order]")
₹5 Crore Income Tax Demand Dropped! CA Praises Faceless Appeal for Hassle & Corruption Free Process
A proposed tax addition of Rs. 5 crores was dropped during the faceless appeal process by the Income Tax Department. The case involved an alleged unexplained unsecured loan under Section 68 of the...
Deduction Claim on Unpaid Ad-hoc Bonus from AY 1984-85: Bombay HC Quashes ₹12L Income Tax Penalty from 2002 ITAT Order citing Plausibility [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court recently set aside a penalty of ₹12,82,700 imposed on Carona Limited, noting that merely claiming deduction on unpaid ad-hoc bonus could not attract penalty under Section...
![Deduction Claim on Unpaid Ad-hoc Bonus from AY 1984-85: Bombay HC Quashes ₹12L Income Tax Penalty from 2002 ITAT Order citing Plausibility [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/14/500x300_2063729-deduction-deduction-claim-deduction-claim-on-unpaid-ad-hoc-bonus-ad-hoc-bonus-taxscan.webp "Deduction Claim on Unpaid Ad-hoc Bonus from AY 1984-85: Bombay HC Quashes ₹12L Income Tax Penalty from 2002 ITAT Order citing Plausibility [Read Order]")
FTC Claim Not Denied Despite Delay as Filing of Form 67 Held Directory, Not Mandatory: ITAT [Read Order]
The Tribunal observed that the AO erred in denying credit for FTC even though the necessary form had been placed on record before the assessment order was passed. The Hyderabad Bench of the Income Tax...
![FTC Claim Not Denied Despite Delay as Filing of Form 67 Held Directory, Not Mandatory: ITAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/13/500x300_2063353-ftc-claim-despite-delay-filing-form-67-directory-mandatory-itat-taxscan.webp "FTC Claim Not Denied Despite Delay as Filing of Form 67 Held Directory, Not Mandatory: ITAT [Read Order]")
![ITAT WEEKLY ROUND-UP [ July 7th - July 12th ]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/12/500x300_2063271-itat-weekly-round-up-taxscan.webp "ITAT WEEKLY ROUND-UP [ July 7th - July 12th ]")
Addition Based on Suspicion of Fictitious Profit via Client Code Modification Facility in F&O Segment Without Investigation Not Sustainable: ITAT [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in its recent ruling held that the addition made by the Assessing Officer(AO) on suspicion basis without any independent investigation ...
![Addition Based on Suspicion of Fictitious Profit via Client Code Modification Facility in F&O Segment Without Investigation Not Sustainable: ITAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/12/500x300_2063200-itat-itat-roundup-weeklyrounup-taxscan-7.webp "Addition Based on Suspicion of Fictitious Profit via Client Code Modification Facility in F&O Segment Without Investigation Not Sustainable: ITAT [Read Order]")
Husband Funded Investment in Joint Property Not Taxable: ITAT Deletes ₹2.18 Cr Addition u/s 69A [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Benchof the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted an addition of ₹2,18,19,600 made under section 69A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, holding that the investment in joint...
![Husband Funded Investment in Joint Property Not Taxable: ITAT Deletes ₹2.18 Cr Addition u/s 69A [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/12/500x300_2063189-joint-property-investment.webp "Husband Funded Investment in Joint Property Not Taxable: ITAT Deletes ₹2.18 Cr Addition u/s 69A [Read Order]")