![Relief for Hyundai Motors: Madras HC Rules Reopening Income Tax Assessment on Same Issue After Prior Query and Reply Invalid [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/29/500x300_2070416-hyundai-motors-income-tax-case-madras-high-court-taxscan.webp "Relief for Hyundai Motors: Madras HC Rules Reopening Income Tax Assessment on Same Issue After Prior Query and Reply Invalid [Read Order]")
Relief for Hyundai Motors: Madras HC Rules Reopening Income Tax Assessment on Same Issue After Prior Query and Reply Invalid [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court held that reopening an income tax assessment on an issue that was already raised and answered during the...
![[BREAKING] “Massive Fraudulent Availment of the ITC”: Delhi HC upholds Penalty against GST Consultant in Rs. 285 Cr Fake ITC Scam [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/29/250x150_2070446-fake-itc-scam-delhi-high-court-taxscan.webp "[BREAKING] “Massive Fraudulent Availment of the ITC”: Delhi HC upholds Penalty against GST Consultant in Rs. 285 Cr Fake ITC Scam [Read Order]")
![Cash Sales Substantiated During Demonetization: ITAT Upholds ₹1.32 Cr Deletion of Cash Deposit Addition [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/29/250x150_2070421-demonetization-itat-taxscan.webp "Cash Sales Substantiated During Demonetization: ITAT Upholds ₹1.32 Cr Deletion of Cash Deposit Addition [Read Order]")
![Failure to Dispose Objections Before Assessment: ITAT Rules Reassessment Proceedings Void [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/29/250x150_2070419-reassessment-itat-taxscan.webp "Failure to Dispose Objections Before Assessment: ITAT Rules Reassessment Proceedings Void [Read Order]")
![ITC Cannot Be Denied to Bona Fide Purchaser Solely Because Seller Fails to Remit Tax: Kerala HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/29/250x150_2070304-kerala-hc-itc-cannot-bona-fide-purchaser-taxscan.webp "ITC Cannot Be Denied to Bona Fide Purchaser Solely Because Seller Fails to Remit Tax: Kerala HC [Read Order]")
Relief to Aircel Ltd: Madras HC quashes Income tax Penalty Proceedings as No hearing Granted, Hardly 24 Hrs Granted to Furnish Reply [Read Order]
While granting the relief to Aircel Limited, the Madras High Court has quashed the income tax penalty proceedings initiated against the company under Section271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961,...
![Relief to Aircel Ltd: Madras HC quashes Income tax Penalty Proceedings as No hearing Granted, Hardly 24 Hrs Granted to Furnish Reply [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/29/500x300_2070282-aircel-ltd-taxscan.webp "Relief to Aircel Ltd: Madras HC quashes Income tax Penalty Proceedings as No hearing Granted, Hardly 24 Hrs Granted to Furnish Reply [Read Order]")
Failure to Examine Notional Rent on Unsold Flats u/s 23(5): ITAT Upholds PCIT’s Revision u/s 263 [Read Order]
The Surat Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) upheld the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT)’s revisionary order under Section 263 after finding that the Assessing Officer(AO)...
![Failure to Examine Notional Rent on Unsold Flats u/s 23(5): ITAT Upholds PCIT’s Revision u/s 263 [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/28/500x300_2070103-failure-to-examine-notional-rent-on-unsold-flats-notional-rent-on-unsold-flats-taxscan.webp "Failure to Examine Notional Rent on Unsold Flats u/s 23(5): ITAT Upholds PCIT’s Revision u/s 263 [Read Order]")
Disallowance of ₹24.22 Lakh Towards ESI/PF u/s 36(1)(va): ITAT Condones Delay, Remands Matter to CPC for Verification [Read Order]
The Lucknow Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ), condoned the delay in filing an appeal against a disallowance of ₹24.22 lakh towards Employees’ State Insurance/Provident Fund (ESI/PF)...
![Disallowance of ₹24.22 Lakh Towards ESI/PF u/s 36(1)(va): ITAT Condones Delay, Remands Matter to CPC for Verification [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/28/500x300_2070088-disallowance-disallowance-of-2422-lakh-towards-esi-pf-esi-pf-section-361va-taxscan.webp "Disallowance of ₹24.22 Lakh Towards ESI/PF u/s 36(1)(va): ITAT Condones Delay, Remands Matter to CPC for Verification [Read Order]")
₹1.5 Crore Treated as Unexplained Cash Credit u/s 68: ITAT Upholds CIT(A)’s Deletion of Addition [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) upheld Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)[CIT(A)]’s order deleting a ₹1.5 crore addition treated as an accommodation entry under...
![₹1.5 Crore Treated as Unexplained Cash Credit u/s 68: ITAT Upholds CIT(A)’s Deletion of Addition [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/28/500x300_2070083-treated-as-unexplained-cash-credit-unexplained-cash-credit-unexplained-cash-tascan.webp "₹1.5 Crore Treated as Unexplained Cash Credit u/s 68: ITAT Upholds CIT(A)’s Deletion of Addition [Read Order]")
Non‑Filing of Form 3CFA With Return u/s 115BBF: ITAT Sets Aside Order and Remands Matter to AO for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]
The Pune Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) set aside the order and remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer (AO) after finding that the denial of Section 115BBF of Income Tax...
![Non‑Filing of Form 3CFA With Return u/s 115BBF: ITAT Sets Aside Order and Remands Matter to AO for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/28/500x300_2070112-form-3cfa-nonfiling-itat-taxscan.webp "Non‑Filing of Form 3CFA With Return u/s 115BBF: ITAT Sets Aside Order and Remands Matter to AO for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]")
Disallowance of ₹58.83 Lakh u/s 57 Deduction for Lack of Evidence: ITAT Remands Matter to AO [Read Order]
The Patna Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer (AO )after examining the disallowance of a ₹58.83 lakh deduction claimed under Section 57 of...
![Disallowance of ₹58.83 Lakh u/s 57 Deduction for Lack of Evidence: ITAT Remands Matter to AO [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/28/500x300_2070060-disallowance-itat-taxscan.webp "Disallowance of ₹58.83 Lakh u/s 57 Deduction for Lack of Evidence: ITAT Remands Matter to AO [Read Order]")