![Relief to Aircel Ltd: Madras HC quashes Income tax Penalty Proceedings as No hearing Granted, Hardly 24 Hrs Granted to Furnish Reply [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/29/2070282-aircel-ltd-taxscan.webp "Relief to Aircel Ltd: Madras HC quashes Income tax Penalty Proceedings as No hearing Granted, Hardly 24 Hrs Granted to Furnish Reply [Read Order]")
Relief to Aircel Ltd: Madras HC quashes Income tax Penalty Proceedings as No hearing Granted, Hardly 24 Hrs Granted to Furnish Reply [Read Order]
While granting the relief to Aircel Limited, the Madras High Court has quashed the income tax penalty proceedings initiated against the company...
![Failure to Examine Notional Rent on Unsold Flats u/s  23(5): ITAT Upholds PCIT’s Revision u/s 263 [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/28/2070103-failure-to-examine-notional-rent-on-unsold-flats-notional-rent-on-unsold-flats-taxscan.webp "Failure to Examine Notional Rent on Unsold Flats u/s  23(5): ITAT Upholds PCIT’s Revision u/s 263 [Read Order]")
![Disallowance of ₹24.22 Lakh Towards ESI/PF u/s 36(1)(va): ITAT Condones Delay, Remands Matter to CPC for Verification [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/28/2070088-disallowance-disallowance-of-2422-lakh-towards-esi-pf-esi-pf-section-361va-taxscan.webp "Disallowance of ₹24.22 Lakh Towards ESI/PF u/s 36(1)(va): ITAT Condones Delay, Remands Matter to CPC for Verification [Read Order]")
![₹1.5 Crore Treated as Unexplained Cash Credit u/s 68: ITAT Upholds CIT(A)’s Deletion of Addition [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/28/2070083-treated-as-unexplained-cash-credit-unexplained-cash-credit-unexplained-cash-tascan.webp "₹1.5 Crore Treated as Unexplained Cash Credit u/s 68: ITAT Upholds CIT(A)’s Deletion of Addition [Read Order]")
Non‑Filing of Form 3CFA With Return u/s 115BBF: ITAT Sets Aside Order and Remands Matter to AO for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]
The Pune Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) set aside the order and remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer (AO) after finding that the denial of Section 115BBF of Income Tax...
![Non‑Filing of Form 3CFA With Return u/s 115BBF: ITAT Sets Aside Order and Remands Matter to AO for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/28/2070112-form-3cfa-nonfiling-itat-taxscan.webp "Non‑Filing of Form 3CFA With Return u/s 115BBF: ITAT Sets Aside Order and Remands Matter to AO for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]")
Disallowance of ₹58.83 Lakh u/s 57 Deduction for Lack of Evidence: ITAT Remands Matter to AO [Read Order]
The Patna Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer (AO )after examining the disallowance of a ₹58.83 lakh deduction claimed under Section 57 of...
![Disallowance of ₹58.83 Lakh u/s 57 Deduction for Lack of Evidence: ITAT Remands Matter to AO [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/28/2070060-disallowance-itat-taxscan.webp "Disallowance of ₹58.83 Lakh u/s 57 Deduction for Lack of Evidence: ITAT Remands Matter to AO [Read Order]")
Writ petition against MP's illegal Income Tax Evasion by Hiding Huge Property not Amounts to PIL: Jharkhand HC dismisses Petition [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Jharkhand High Court was hearing a writ petition against Member of Parliament for illegal income tax evasion by hiding huge property. The court held that this writ petition is...
![Writ petition against MPs illegal Income Tax Evasion by Hiding Huge Property not Amounts to PIL: Jharkhand HC dismisses Petition [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/28/2069993-tax-evasion-taxscan.webp "Writ petition against MPs illegal Income Tax Evasion by Hiding Huge Property not Amounts to PIL: Jharkhand HC dismisses Petition [Read Order]")
Professional Fees Disallowance: ITAT Deletes ₹27 Lakh Addition, Rules Mere Unserved Notices u/s 133(6) Insufficient for Disallowance [Read Order]
The Jaipur Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) deleted the disallowance of professional fees amounting to Rs. 27,00,000 and ruled that mere return of notices under Section 133(6) as ...
![Professional Fees Disallowance: ITAT Deletes ₹27 Lakh Addition, Rules Mere Unserved Notices u/s 133(6) Insufficient for Disallowance [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/28/2069878-insufficient-disallowance-itat-taxscan.webp "Professional Fees Disallowance: ITAT Deletes ₹27 Lakh Addition, Rules Mere Unserved Notices u/s 133(6) Insufficient for Disallowance [Read Order]")
Addition u/s 143(1) Without Prior SCN Invalid: ITAT Deletes ₹4.20 Cr Adjustment, Citing Procedural Lapse [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) deleted the disallowance of Rs. 4,20,23,463 under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and ruled that the adjustment was invalid ...
![Addition u/s 143(1) Without Prior SCN Invalid: ITAT Deletes ₹4.20 Cr Adjustment, Citing Procedural Lapse [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/28/2069889-itat-kolkat-scn-taxscan.webp "Addition u/s 143(1) Without Prior SCN Invalid: ITAT Deletes ₹4.20 Cr Adjustment, Citing Procedural Lapse [Read Order]")
Bogus Purchase Addition Without Adequate Verification: ITAT Restores ₹8.79 Lakh Matter to AO for Re-adjudication with Opportunity to Taxpayer [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) restored the matter involving bogus purchase addition of Rs. 8.79 lakh to the Assessing Officer (AO) for fresh adjudication and held...
![Bogus Purchase Addition Without Adequate Verification: ITAT Restores ₹8.79 Lakh Matter to AO for Re-adjudication with Opportunity to Taxpayer [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/28/2069863-itat-ahmedabad-income-tax-bogus-purchases-citing-genuine-sales-taxscan-1.webp "Bogus Purchase Addition Without Adequate Verification: ITAT Restores ₹8.79 Lakh Matter to AO for Re-adjudication with Opportunity to Taxpayer [Read Order]")