Income Tax, GST Depts Join Forces: Reopening Old I-T Assessments Over GST Invoice Mismatches and Fake ITC Claims
The Income Tax Department has started looking into old tax assessment cases again to catch people and companies who tried to evade taxes by showing...
![Patna HC Holds Income Tax Reassessment Notice Valid as Initial Notice Falls Within Limitation Period [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Reassessment-notice.jpg "Patna HC Holds Income Tax Reassessment Notice Valid as Initial Notice Falls Within Limitation Period [Read Order]")
![ITAT Allows Rs. 6.47 Crore Lease Rent Expense as Deduction Citing Lessee’s Right to Claim Depreciation [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Depreciation-ITAT-Lease-Rent-TAXSCAN.jpg "ITAT Allows Rs. 6.47 Crore Lease Rent Expense as Deduction Citing Lessee’s Right to Claim Depreciation [Read Order]")
![ITAT quashes CIT(A)’s Ex Parte Penalty Orders Due to Wrong Email Service [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Wrong-Email-Service.jpg "ITAT quashes CIT(A)’s Ex Parte Penalty Orders Due to Wrong Email Service [Read Order]")
![Delhi HC Quashes Notice u/s 148 of Income Tax Act for Improper Service on Foreign Entity [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/notice-Delhi-HC-Income-Tax-Act-TAXSCAN.jpg "Delhi HC Quashes Notice u/s 148 of Income Tax Act for Improper Service on Foreign Entity [Read Order]")
![Calcutta HC upholds Transfer Order Passed u/s 127 of Income Tax Act 8 years Ago [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Income-Tax-Calcutta-HC-Upholds-Income-Tax-Act-taxscan.jpg "Calcutta HC upholds Transfer Order Passed u/s 127 of Income Tax Act 8 years Ago [Read Order]")
Taxpayer Not Property Owner, Only POA Holder: ITAT Remands Rs. 4.73 Crore LTCG Addition Matter [Read Order]
The Hyderabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) remanded a matter involving Long-Term Capital Gain (LTCG) addition of Rs. 4.73 crore after the assessee claimed that he was not the...
![Taxpayer Not Property Owner, Only POA Holder: ITAT Remands Rs. 4.73 Crore LTCG Addition Matter [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/LTCG.jpg "Taxpayer Not Property Owner, Only POA Holder: ITAT Remands Rs. 4.73 Crore LTCG Addition Matter [Read Order]")
![ITAT Orders Reconsidering Trusts Registration, Imposes ₹10,000 Cost [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/trust-registration-ITAT-Imposes-taxscan-.jpg "ITAT Orders Reconsidering Trusts Registration, Imposes ₹10,000 Cost [Read Order]")
ITAT Upholds CIT(A) Order: No Addition U/s 69A Without Corroborative Evidence & Cross-Examination [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Ahmedabad Bench, has upheld the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] deleting an addition of Rs. 2.65 crore made under Section 69A of...
![ITAT Upholds CIT(A) Order: No Addition U/s 69A Without Corroborative Evidence & Cross-Examination [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Cross-Examination.jpg "ITAT Upholds CIT(A) Order: No Addition U/s 69A Without Corroborative Evidence & Cross-Examination [Read Order]")
ITAT dismisses Revenue's Appeal: No Addition U/s 68 for Partner's Capital when Identity & Creditworthiness Proved [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Ahmedabad Bench “C”, has dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue challenging the deletion of an addition of Rs.8 crore made under Section 68 of the Income...
![ITAT dismisses Revenues Appeal: No Addition U/s 68 for Partners Capital when Identity & Creditworthiness Proved [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/ITAT-Revenue-Partners-Capital-Identity-Creditworthiness-taxscan.jpeg "ITAT dismisses Revenues Appeal: No Addition U/s 68 for Partners Capital when Identity & Creditworthiness Proved [Read Order]")
CIT(A) Wrongly notes Long-Term Capital Loss as Rs.16.89 Lakhs Instead of Rs.16.89 Crores: ITAT Orders Verification [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) restored the matter to the file of the Assessing Officer (AO) for verification, in a case where a capital loss amounting to Rs. 16.89...
![CIT(A) Wrongly notes Long-Term Capital Loss as Rs.16.89 Lakhs Instead of Rs.16.89 Crores: ITAT Orders Verification [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/ITAT-Mumbai-Capital-Loss-Long-Term-Capital-Loss-taxscan.jpg "CIT(A) Wrongly notes Long-Term Capital Loss as Rs.16.89 Lakhs Instead of Rs.16.89 Crores: ITAT Orders Verification [Read Order]")
