![Additions for Cash Deposits and Advances u/s 69A: ITAT Deletes Addition Based on Recorded Sales [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Additions-for-Cash-Deposits-Cash-Deposits-Cash-Deposits-and-Advances-Section-69A-ITAT-ITAT-Deletes-Addition-Based-on-Recorded-Sales-Recorded-Sales-taxscan.jpg "Additions for Cash Deposits and Advances u/s 69A: ITAT Deletes Addition Based on Recorded Sales [Read Order]")
Additions for Cash Deposits and Advances u/s 69A: ITAT Deletes Addition Based on Recorded Sales [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT)deleted the addition made under Section 69A of Income Tax Act,1961 for cash deposits and...
![Interest on Enhanced Compensation u/s 28 of Land Acquisition is Part of Total Compensation, Not Income: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ITAT-ITAT-Delhi-ITAT-case-on-land-acquisition-compensation-taxscan.jpg "Interest on Enhanced Compensation u/s 28 of Land Acquisition is Part of Total Compensation, Not Income: ITAT [Read Order]")
![When Dept. is Custodian, It Cannot Blame Taxpayer for Not Filing Original S.12A Registration Certificate: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ITAT-ITAT-Pune-Income-tax-Section-12A-of-Income-Tax-Act-TAXSCAN.jpg "When Dept. is Custodian, It Cannot Blame Taxpayer for Not Filing Original S.12A Registration Certificate: ITAT [Read Order]")
![ITAT upholds TPOs Rejection of RRB Energy Ltd. as Comparable Citing Negative Margins & Functional Differences [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ITAT-ITAT-Chennai-RRB-Energy-Ltd-ITAT-Upholds-TPO-Taxscan-.jpg "ITAT upholds TPOs Rejection of RRB Energy Ltd. as Comparable Citing Negative Margins & Functional Differences [Read Order]")
![ITAT Holds Service Receipts Not Taxable as FTS under India-Singapore DTAA due to Lack of Knowledge Transfer [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ITAT-ITAT-Mumbai-ITAT-Holds-Service-Receipts-taxable-as-FTS-Taxscan.jpg "ITAT Holds Service Receipts Not Taxable as FTS under India-Singapore DTAA due to Lack of Knowledge Transfer [Read Order]")
ITAT Sets Aside ₹4.16 Cr Tax Addition, Citing Misinterpretation of Section 69A and Procedural Lapse [Read Order]
The Raipur Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) set aside the assessment order in the case of Harish Pandey, directing the assessing officer (AO) to conduct a fresh assessment. The...
![ITAT Sets Aside ₹4.16 Cr Tax Addition, Citing Misinterpretation of Section 69A and Procedural Lapse [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ITAT-ITAT-Raipur-Income-tax-addition-Section-69A-of-income-tax-act-taxscan.jpg "ITAT Sets Aside ₹4.16 Cr Tax Addition, Citing Misinterpretation of Section 69A and Procedural Lapse [Read Order]")
TPO already made Adjustments on Information & Technology Fees: ITAT deletes AO's Protective Addition [Read Order]
The Bangalore Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) deleted the protective addition made by the Assessing Officer (AO) because the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) had already made...
![TPO already made Adjustments on Information & Technology Fees: ITAT deletes AOs Protective Addition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/TPO-Adjustments-Information-Technology-Fees-ITAT-AOs-Protective-Addition-taxscan.jpg "TPO already made Adjustments on Information & Technology Fees: ITAT deletes AOs Protective Addition [Read Order]")
Tax Effect of ₹54.04 Lakh Below CBDT’s 60 Lakh Limit: ITAT Dismisses Revenue’s Appeal [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) dismissed the Revenue’s appeal, noting that the tax effect of ₹54.04 lakh was below the ₹60 lakh threshold set by Central Board of Direct...
![Tax Effect of ₹54.04 Lakh Below CBDT’s 60 Lakh Limit: ITAT Dismisses Revenue’s Appeal [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/TAT-ITAT-Delhi-CBDT-ITAT-Dismisses-Revenue-Appeal-taxscan.jpg "Tax Effect of ₹54.04 Lakh Below CBDT’s 60 Lakh Limit: ITAT Dismisses Revenue’s Appeal [Read Order]")
![Capitalized R&D expenditure can be claimed u/s 35(1)(iv) if disallowed u/s 35(2AB): ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Capitalized-RD-expenditure-RD-expenditure-claimed-Section-351iv-disallowed-Section-352AB-disallowed-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Capitalized R&D expenditure can be claimed u/s 35(1)(iv) if disallowed u/s 35(2AB): ITAT [Read Order]")
![ITAT Directs Fresh Assessment in Property Valuation Dispute u/s 50C [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ITAT-ITAT-Directs-Fresh-Assessment-in-Property-Valuation-Fresh-Assessment-Property-Valuation-Property-Valuation-Dispute-Section-50C-taxscan.jpg "ITAT Directs Fresh Assessment in Property Valuation Dispute u/s 50C [Read Order]")
![ITAT quashes Reassessment Due to Vague Reasons and Lack of Jurisdiction for New Additions [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ITAT-ITAT-Quashes-Reassessment-Due-Vague-Reasons-and-Lack-of-Jurisdiction-Lack-of-Jurisdiction-Lack-of-Jurisdiction-for-New-Additions-Jurisdiction-for-New-Additions-taxscan.jpg "ITAT quashes Reassessment Due to Vague Reasons and Lack of Jurisdiction for New Additions [Read Order]")
ICMAI Seeks Inclusion of Cost Accountants in ‘Accountant’ Definition in Income Tax Bill, Writes to FM
The Institute of Cost Accountants of India ( ICMAI ) has written a letter to the Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman to include Cost Accountants in the definition of ‘Accountant’ under Section...
