![Recovery Officer cannot attach Taxpayers OD Account with Banks by Exercising Power u/s 226(3) of Income Tax Act: Himachal Pradesh HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Himachal-Pradesh-HC-Himachal-Pradesh-High-Court-Recovery-Officer-taxpayers-over-draft-account-Income-Tax-High-Court-High-Court-News-taxscan.jpg "Recovery Officer cannot attach Taxpayers OD Account with Banks by Exercising Power u/s 226(3) of Income Tax Act: Himachal Pradesh HC [Read Order]")
Recovery Officer cannot attach Taxpayer's OD Account with Banks by Exercising Power u/s 226(3) of Income Tax Act: Himachal Pradesh HC [Read Order]
The Himachal Pradesh High Court recovery officer cannot attach taxpayer's over draft account with banks by exercising powers under section 226(3) of...
![ITAT directs AO to delete Addition due to Disallowance u/s 14A made without recording satisfaction regarding Assessees Books of Account [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/ITAT-ITAT-Cochin-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Income-Tax-taxscan.jpg "ITAT directs AO to delete Addition due to Disallowance u/s 14A made without recording satisfaction regarding Assessees Books of Account [Read Order]")
![Simply Writing “I am satisfied” not a Valid Approval for Notice u/s 148 of Income Tax Act: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Delhi-High-Court-Income-Tax-Income-Tax-Act-Section-148-of-Income-Tax-Act-Valid-Approval-for-Notice-taxscan.jpg "Simply Writing “I am satisfied” not a Valid Approval for Notice u/s 148 of Income Tax Act: Delhi HC [Read Order]")
![No Finding by CIT(A) against Claim u/s 56(2)(viib): ITAT remands Revision Order for Re-examination of Qualification as Venture Capital [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/ITAT-Income-Tax-ITAT-Chandigarh-CIT-Against-Claim-TAXSCAN.webp "No Finding by CIT(A) against Claim u/s 56(2)(viib): ITAT remands Revision Order for Re-examination of Qualification as Venture Capital [Read Order]")
![Lack of Notice for Hearing served to assessee: ITAT restores file for Denovo proceedings [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/TAT-ITAT-Chandigarh-Denovo-proceedings-Lack-of-notice-for-hearing-ITAT-restores-file-Income-tax-taxscan.jpg "Lack of Notice for Hearing served to assessee: ITAT restores file for Denovo proceedings [Read Order]")
“This interpretation leads to absurd situation”: ITAT Quashes Denial of Registration of Trust owing to Belated Filing [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Cochin Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) quashed the denial of registration to the appellant/assesee Gajanana Charitable Trust due to a delayed application. ...
![“This interpretation leads to absurd situation”: ITAT Quashes Denial of Registration of Trust owing to Belated Filing [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/ITAT-ITAT-Cochin-Denial-of-Registration-Income-tax-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Charitable-Trust-taxscan.jpg "“This interpretation leads to absurd situation”: ITAT Quashes Denial of Registration of Trust owing to Belated Filing [Read Order]")
Interest Earned from Savings Account in Co-operative Bank cannot be treated as Income or Dividend from Investment: ITAT [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) ruled that interest earned from savings accounts in a Co-operative bank cannot be treated as income or dividends from investments. ...
![Interest Earned from Savings Account in Co-operative Bank cannot be treated as Income or Dividend from Investment: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/ITAT-Chennai-Income-Tax-ITAT-Interest-in-co-operative-bank-TAXSCAN.jpg "Interest Earned from Savings Account in Co-operative Bank cannot be treated as Income or Dividend from Investment: ITAT [Read Order]")
ITAT sets aside Ex-Parte addition of Rs. 29.5 lakh due to assessee’s Illness and Husband's Demise [Read Order]
The Chandigarh bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) sets aside the ex-parte order due to the assessee’s illness and husband's demise and grants a final hearing regarding the addition...
![ITAT sets aside Ex-Parte addition of Rs. 29.5 lakh due to assessee’s Illness and Husbands Demise [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/ITAT-Chandigarh-Income-Tax-Ex-parte-order-by-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpeg "ITAT sets aside Ex-Parte addition of Rs. 29.5 lakh due to assessee’s Illness and Husbands Demise [Read Order]")
PCCIT’s or Director General's Approval required for Income Tax Reassessment Post 3 Year Time Limit: ITAT [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) quashed reassessment proceedings because the approval was wrongly obtained from the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax ( PCIT ) instead of...
![PCCIT’s or Director Generals Approval required for Income Tax Reassessment Post 3 Year Time Limit: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/ITAT-ITAT-Mumbai-Income-tax-Income-Tax-Reassessment-Director-General-PCIT-PCCIT-Approval-Director-General-Approval-taxscan.jpg "PCCIT’s or Director Generals Approval required for Income Tax Reassessment Post 3 Year Time Limit: ITAT [Read Order]")
Order must be Erroneous and Prejudicial to Revenue Interests for Invoking S.263 of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) ruled that for invoking Section 263 of the Income Tax Act,1961 an order must be both erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the...
![Order must be Erroneous and Prejudicial to Revenue Interests for Invoking S.263 of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/ITAT-ITAT-Ahmedabad-Income-tax-Income-Tax-Act-Revenue-Interests-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-taxscan.jpeg "Order must be Erroneous and Prejudicial to Revenue Interests for Invoking S.263 of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]")
PCIT's S.263 action invalid as It Constitutes an Impermissible Second Opinion: ITAT allows Appeal [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax's (PCIT) action under Section 263 was invalid as it constituted an impermissible second...
![PCITs S.263 action invalid as It Constitutes an Impermissible Second Opinion: ITAT allows Appeal [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/ITAT-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-PCIT-Principal-Commissioner-of-Income-Tax-Section-263-TAT-news-TAXSCAN.jpg "PCITs S.263 action invalid as It Constitutes an Impermissible Second Opinion: ITAT allows Appeal [Read Order]")