![Absence of Faceless Assessment envisaged u/s 144B of Income Tax Act Invalidate SCN: Punjab & Haryana HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court-Income-Tax-Income-Tax-Act-Section-144B-of-Income-Tax-Act-Faceless-Assessment-Taxscan.jpeg "Absence of Faceless Assessment envisaged u/s 144B of Income Tax Act Invalidate SCN: Punjab & Haryana HC [Read Order]")
Absence of Faceless Assessment envisaged u/s 144B of Income Tax Act Invalidate SCN: Punjab & Haryana HC [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Punjab And Haryana High Court has held that absence of faceless assessment envisaged under section 144B of Income Tax Act, 961...
![Determinate Beneficiaries to be Taxed as “Individual”, Not as “Association Of Persons” at Marginal Rate: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/ITAT-Income-Tax-ITAT-Mumbai-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-TAXSCAN-1.jpg "Determinate Beneficiaries to be Taxed as “Individual”, Not as “Association Of Persons” at Marginal Rate: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Purchase of One Residential House with Modifications of Two Adjacent Properties Amounts to a Single Residential House: ITAT Allows S.54F Exemption Claim [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/ITAT-Income-Tax-ITAT-Mumbai-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Income-Tax-Act-TAXSCAN.jpg "Purchase of One Residential House with Modifications of Two Adjacent Properties Amounts to a Single Residential House: ITAT Allows S.54F Exemption Claim [Read Order]")
![ITAT sets aside CIT(A) Order, Remands Case to AO for Fresh Adjudication due to Denial of Fair Hearing [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/ITAT-ITAT-Delhi-Income-Tax-Commissioner-of-Income-Tax-Remands-Case-for-Fresh-Adjudication-Taxscan.jpg "ITAT sets aside CIT(A) Order, Remands Case to AO for Fresh Adjudication due to Denial of Fair Hearing [Read Order]")
![Exemption Claim to MSME Unit to File Audit Report u/s 44 AD of Income Tax Act: Orissa HC Directs Scrutiny Committee to Review Matter [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Income-Tax-Income-Tax-Act-Orissa-HC-Orissa-High-Court-MSME-claims-TAXSCAN.jpg "Exemption Claim to MSME Unit to File Audit Report u/s 44 AD of Income Tax Act: Orissa HC Directs Scrutiny Committee to Review Matter [Read Order]")
Rent Income from Profit and Gains of Leasing Company Assessable as ‘Income from Profits and Gains of Business’: Bombay High Court [Read Order]
In a recent decision, the Bombay High Court maintained that Rent Income from the profit and gains of a leasing company derived through the lease of its owned properties can be assessed as ‘income...
![Rent Income from Profit and Gains of Leasing Company Assessable as ‘Income from Profits and Gains of Business’: Bombay High Court [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Bombay-High-Court-Rent-income-taxation-Tax-on-leasing-company-earnings-Business-income-tax-taxscan.jpg "Rent Income from Profit and Gains of Leasing Company Assessable as ‘Income from Profits and Gains of Business’: Bombay High Court [Read Order]")
Capital Gains Arising Out of Sale of Long-Term Capital Assets Shall Be Taxable at Rate of 20% u/s 112 Of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) ruled that capital gains arising from the sale of long-term capital assets shall be taxable at a rate of 20% under Section 112 of the Income...
![Capital Gains Arising Out of Sale of Long-Term Capital Assets Shall Be Taxable at Rate of 20% u/s 112 Of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/ITAT-ITAT-Mumbai-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Capital-Gains-Sale-of-Long-Term-Capital-Assets-Taxable-at-Rate-Section-112-of-the-Income-Tax-taxscan.jpg "Capital Gains Arising Out of Sale of Long-Term Capital Assets Shall Be Taxable at Rate of 20% u/s 112 Of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]")
No Additions Permitted u/s 153A without Incriminating Material found during Search: ITAT [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) ruled that no additions are permitted under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act,1961 without incriminating material found during a search. ...
![No Additions Permitted u/s 153A without Incriminating Material found during Search: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/ITAT-ITAT-Delhi-Incriminating-Material-Found-Incriminating-Material-No-Additions-Permitted-Section-153A-of-the-Income-Tax-Act-ITAT-news-taxscan.jpg "No Additions Permitted u/s 153A without Incriminating Material found during Search: ITAT [Read Order]")
Rejecting Records Solely due to Handwritten Form Is unjust without considering Taxpayer’s Explanation and Business Context: ITAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled that rejecting records solely due to handwritten form is unjust without considering the taxpayer’s explanation and business...
![Rejecting Records Solely due to Handwritten Form Is unjust without considering Taxpayer’s Explanation and Business Context: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/ITAT-ITAT-Ahmedabad-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Rejecting-Records-Solely-Records-Solely-Handwritten-Form-Taxpayers-Explanation-taxscan.jpg "Rejecting Records Solely due to Handwritten Form Is unjust without considering Taxpayer’s Explanation and Business Context: ITAT [Read Order]")
Repeated Non-appearance before CIT(A) & AO without Justifiable Cause: ITAT Confirms Addition & Penalty on Unexplained Transaction of ₹83.4L [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) confirmed the addition and penalty on unexplained transactions of Rs. 83.4 lakhs due to the assessee's repeated non-appearance before...
![Repeated Non-appearance before CIT(A) & AO without Justifiable Cause: ITAT Confirms Addition & Penalty on Unexplained Transaction of ₹83.4L [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/ITAT-ITAT-Ahmedabad-ITAT-Confirms-Repeated-Non-appearance-Penalty-on-Unexplained-Transaction-Justifiable-Cause-assessing-officer-taxscan.jpg "Repeated Non-appearance before CIT(A) & AO without Justifiable Cause: ITAT Confirms Addition & Penalty on Unexplained Transaction of ₹83.4L [Read Order]")
ITAT upholds CIT(A) findings on Unsecured Loans, Citing Lack of Incriminating Evidence [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) upheld the findings of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)[ CIT(A) ] regarding unsecured loans for the assessment year (AY) 2015-2016,...
![ITAT upholds CIT(A) findings on Unsecured Loans, Citing Lack of Incriminating Evidence [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/ITAT-ITAT-Delhi-Unsecured-Loans-CITA-Taxscan.jpg "ITAT upholds CIT(A) findings on Unsecured Loans, Citing Lack of Incriminating Evidence [Read Order]")
Inordinate Delay of 880 Days in Re -filing Income Tax Appeal: Delhi HC rejects Condonation Plea. [Read Order]
In a recent case before Delhi High Court the condonation of delay appeal filed by revenue was dismissed on grounds of unreasonable delay of 880 days in submitting the appeal. The Commissioner of...
![Inordinate Delay of 880 Days in Re -filing Income Tax Appeal: Delhi HC rejects Condonation Plea. [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Delhi-HC-Delhi-High-Court-Delhi-HC-Rejects-Condonation-Plea.-Inordinate-Delay-Re-filing-Income-Tax-Appeal-Income-Tax-Appeal-condonation-of-delay-High-Court-News-taxscan.jpg "Inordinate Delay of 880 Days in Re -filing Income Tax Appeal: Delhi HC rejects Condonation Plea. [Read Order]")