![CIT(E) Rejects Trust’s Registration Regularisation Filed Under Incorrect Provision due to Portal Issue Without SCN: ITAT remands Case [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ITAT-ITAT-Bangalore-Assessments-Tax-Exemption-Taxscan.jpg "CIT(E) Rejects Trust’s Registration Regularisation Filed Under Incorrect Provision due to Portal Issue Without SCN: ITAT remands Case [Read Order]")
CIT(E) Rejects Trust’s Registration Regularisation Filed Under Incorrect Provision due to Portal Issue Without SCN: ITAT remands Case [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai Bench, remanded the case of a charitable trust, back to the Commissioner of...
![ITAT Dismisses Revenue’s Appeals against Civil Contractor as Tax Effect Below ₹60 Lakhs, Grounds Termed “Cryptic and Nebulous” [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ITAT-ITAT-Dismisses-Revenues-Appeals-Revenues-Appeals-taxscan.jpg "ITAT Dismisses Revenue’s Appeals against Civil Contractor as Tax Effect Below ₹60 Lakhs, Grounds Termed “Cryptic and Nebulous” [Read Order]")
![Non-serving of Copy of Draft Assessment Order to person who is not an “eligible assessee” u/s 144 B of Income Tax Act will not vitiate Assessment Order: Kerala HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Assessment-Order-kerala-high-court-taxscan.webp "Non-serving of Copy of Draft Assessment Order to person who is not an “eligible assessee” u/s 144 B of Income Tax Act will not vitiate Assessment Order: Kerala HC [Read Order]")
![Supreme Court Clarifies S. 80-IA(9) of Income Tax Act Does not affect Computability of Cumulative Deductions [Read Judgement]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Supreme-Court-Section80-IA9-of-Income-Tax-Act-Income-Tax-Act-taxscan.jpg "Supreme Court Clarifies S. 80-IA(9) of Income Tax Act Does not affect Computability of Cumulative Deductions [Read Judgement]")
Income Tax Assessment Order passed 5 Hours before Deadline to file SCN Reply: Bombay HC Quashes Revenue Order [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court recently upheld the principles of natural justice, quashing an income tax reassessment order that was passed by the department before the deadline that had been allotted to the...
![Income Tax Assessment Order passed 5 Hours before Deadline to file SCN Reply: Bombay HC Quashes Revenue Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Assessment-Order-site-img-1.jpg "Income Tax Assessment Order passed 5 Hours before Deadline to file SCN Reply: Bombay HC Quashes Revenue Order [Read Order]")
Revenue's Claim of Exceptional Case Rejected: Delhi HC Dismisses Appeal Over Monetary Threshold [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court has dismissed an appeal filed by the income tax department on the ground that the tax effect involved was below the prescribed monetary threshold of ₹2 crore, and no exceptional...
![Revenues Claim of Exceptional Case Rejected: Delhi HC Dismisses Appeal Over Monetary Threshold [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Delhi-High-Court-Revenues-Claim-Exceptional-Case-Rejected-taxscan.jpg "Revenues Claim of Exceptional Case Rejected: Delhi HC Dismisses Appeal Over Monetary Threshold [Read Order]")
Casio's Income Tax Appeal Disposal Delayed for 12 Years, ₹3.5 Cr Recovered despite Pendency: Delhi HC Directs Expeditious Disposal [Read Order]
In an important order, the Delhi High Court has pulled up the Income Tax Department for an inordinate delay of over 12 years in disposing of Casio India’s income tax appeal, even as the department...
![Casios Income Tax Appeal Disposal Delayed for 12 Years, ₹3.5 Cr Recovered despite Pendency: Delhi HC Directs Expeditious Disposal [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/casio-site-img.jpg "Casios Income Tax Appeal Disposal Delayed for 12 Years, ₹3.5 Cr Recovered despite Pendency: Delhi HC Directs Expeditious Disposal [Read Order]")
No Justification for Withholding Income Tax Refund: Madras HC Directs Rs. 92 Lakh Payout with Interest to Taxpayer [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has directed the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax to consider and dispose of a representation submitted by the petitioner for a pending tax refund of Rs. 92 lakh along with...
![No Justification for Withholding Income Tax Refund: Madras HC Directs Rs. 92 Lakh Payout with Interest to Taxpayer [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/income-tax-refund-site-img.jpg "No Justification for Withholding Income Tax Refund: Madras HC Directs Rs. 92 Lakh Payout with Interest to Taxpayer [Read Order]")
Failure to Pay Admitted Income Tax amount Due to Financial Crisis: Madras HC Directs Installment Payments [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has directed the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to entertain an appeal filed by the petitioner subject to the payment of the balance admitted Income tax amount of Rs....
![Failure to Pay Admitted Income Tax amount Due to Financial Crisis: Madras HC Directs Installment Payments [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Income-Tax-amount-Income-Tax-Failure-to-Pay-Admitted-Income-Tax-amount-taxscan.jpg "Failure to Pay Admitted Income Tax amount Due to Financial Crisis: Madras HC Directs Installment Payments [Read Order]")
Limitation Starts from Date of Seizure, Not Search: Madras High Court Upholds S. 153C Income Tax Notice as Valid [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has held that the limitation period for issuing notices under section 153C to a third party commences from the date when materials are seized or requisitioned, not from the date...
![Limitation Starts from Date of Seizure, Not Search: Madras High Court Upholds S. 153C Income Tax Notice as Valid [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Income-Tax-Notice-madras-high-court-taxscan.jpg "Limitation Starts from Date of Seizure, Not Search: Madras High Court Upholds S. 153C Income Tax Notice as Valid [Read Order]")
Income Tax Appeal Delay Due to Lottery Business Closure and Counsel’s Death during COVID-19: Madras HC Condones 544 Days [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has condoned a 544-day delay in filing an income tax appeal citing the petitioner’s genuine reasons for the delay which included business closure, the death of their counsel...
![Income Tax Appeal Delay Due to Lottery Business Closure and Counsel’s Death during COVID-19: Madras HC Condones 544 Days [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Supreme-Court-Sikkim-Highcourt-Judgement-GST-Lottery-GST-on-Lottery-Sikkim-Highcourt-Judgement-taxscan.jpg "Income Tax Appeal Delay Due to Lottery Business Closure and Counsel’s Death during COVID-19: Madras HC Condones 544 Days [Read Order]")