![Old v/s New Limitation: ITAT Quashes AY 2013‑14 Reopening as Old Regime Bars Reassessment Despite New 10‑Year Rule u/s 149 [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/08/2110910-itat-chennai-reassessment-old-vs-new-limitation-reopening-old-regime-bars-taxscan.webp "Old v/s New Limitation: ITAT Quashes AY 2013‑14 Reopening as Old Regime Bars Reassessment Despite New 10‑Year Rule u/s 149 [Read Order]")
Old v/s New Limitation: ITAT Quashes AY 2013‑14 Reopening as Old Regime Bars Reassessment Despite New 10‑Year Rule u/s 149 [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ), Chennai, has struck down reassessment proceedings against the respondent for...
![Chhattisgarh HC Rejects M.Com Student’s Plea for Third Re-Evaluation of Income Tax Marks Over Belated Application Filing [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/05/2110326-chattisgarh-hc-mcom-students-plea-third-re-evaluation-income-tax-marks-application-filing-taxscan.webp "Chhattisgarh HC Rejects M.Com Student’s Plea for Third Re-Evaluation of Income Tax Marks Over Belated Application Filing [Read Order]")
![ITAT Remands 26AS Mismatch to AO for Verification of Actual Receipts and TDS Credits for Accurate Income Reporting [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/29/2108711-itat-directs-re-adjudication-taxscan.webp "ITAT Remands 26AS Mismatch to AO for Verification of Actual Receipts and TDS Credits for Accurate Income Reporting [Read Order]")
![ITAT Upholds Assessee’s Consistent 70:30 Allocation of Sales Promotion and Financial Expenses Between Revenue and Capital Work-in-Progress [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/29/2108710-itat-assessee-sales-promotion-financial-expenses-revenue-capital-taxscan.webp "ITAT Upholds Assessee’s Consistent 70:30 Allocation of Sales Promotion and Financial Expenses Between Revenue and Capital Work-in-Progress [Read Order]")
ITAT Upholds 153C Assessments but Deletes Cash Payment Additions for Lack of Corroboration and No Cross-Examination [Read Order]
ITAT Deletes Cash Additions for Lack of Proof while Upholding 153C Assessments The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) partly allowed four appeals filed by Akhraj...
![ITAT Upholds 153C Assessments but Deletes Cash Payment Additions for Lack of Corroboration and No Cross-Examination [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/29/2108707-cash-payment-taxscan.jfif "ITAT Upholds 153C Assessments but Deletes Cash Payment Additions for Lack of Corroboration and No Cross-Examination [Read Order]")
ITAT Sets Aside ₹6.90 Cr Share Premium Addition for Non-Consideration of Assessee’s Evidence [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) set aside the addition of ₹6,90,45,000 made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, holding that both the Assessing Officer...
![ITAT Sets Aside ₹6.90 Cr Share Premium Addition for Non-Consideration of Assessee’s Evidence [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/29/2108701-itat-premium-addition-non-consideration-assessee-evidence-taxscan.webp "ITAT Sets Aside ₹6.90 Cr Share Premium Addition for Non-Consideration of Assessee’s Evidence [Read Order]")
Revision Invalid when Assessment Order u/s 153A passed with JCIT Approval u/s 153D: ITAT [Read Order]
The Pune Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) set aside an order passed under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and ruled that a revision of an assessment order made under Section...
![Revision Invalid when Assessment Order u/s 153A passed with JCIT Approval u/s 153D: ITAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/29/2108691-the-income-tax-act-mandatory-approval-taxscan.webp "Revision Invalid when Assessment Order u/s 153A passed with JCIT Approval u/s 153D: ITAT [Read Order]")
TPO's Failure to Adopt Prescribed Benchmarking Method u/s 92C: ITAT Deletes Protective TP Addition on Interest Income [Read Order]
The Pune Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) deleted a protective Transfer Pricing (TP) adjustment of ₹13,81,700 on interest income and ruled that the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) ...
![TPOs Failure to Adopt Prescribed Benchmarking Method u/s 92C: ITAT Deletes Protective TP Addition on Interest Income [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/29/2108703-itat-pune-tpo-taxscan.webp "TPOs Failure to Adopt Prescribed Benchmarking Method u/s 92C: ITAT Deletes Protective TP Addition on Interest Income [Read Order]")
Seized Cash Once Taxed in Brother’s Hands cannot be Taxed Again: ITAT remands ₹4L Cash Addition [Read Order]
The Patna Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) partly allowed the appeal, holding that the same seized cash cannot be added twice, once in his hands and again in the hands of his...
![Seized Cash Once Taxed in Brother’s Hands cannot be Taxed Again: ITAT remands ₹4L Cash Addition [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/28/2108599-itat-patna-seized-cash-taxscan.webp "Seized Cash Once Taxed in Brother’s Hands cannot be Taxed Again: ITAT remands ₹4L Cash Addition [Read Order]")
ITAT Upholds Capital Gains on Transfer of Development Rights under JDA: Remands to AO to Allow Indexed Cost of Acquisition [Read Order]
The Patna Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) allowed the appeal, upholding the capital gains assessed on the transfer of development rights under a Joint Development Agreement (JDA),...
![ITAT Upholds Capital Gains on Transfer of Development Rights under JDA: Remands to AO to Allow Indexed Cost of Acquisition [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/28/2108604-itat-upholds-capital-gains-transfer-development-rightsm-jda-remands-ao-t-indexed-cost-acquisition-taxscan.webp "ITAT Upholds Capital Gains on Transfer of Development Rights under JDA: Remands to AO to Allow Indexed Cost of Acquisition [Read Order]")
ITAT Restores Appeal After Improper 249(4) Dismissal: CIT(A) Must Re-Examine Bogus Loan Addition Based on Third Party Statements [Read Order]
The ITAT ruled the CIT(A) wrongly dismissed the appeal and ordered fresh review of the Section 68 addition based only on third-party statements. The Jaipur Bench of the Income Tax Appellate...
![ITAT Restores Appeal After Improper 249(4) Dismissal: CIT(A) Must Re-Examine Bogus Loan Addition Based on Third Party Statements [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/28/2108575-itat-11.webp "ITAT Restores Appeal After Improper 249(4) Dismissal: CIT(A) Must Re-Examine Bogus Loan Addition Based on Third Party Statements [Read Order]")