Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
![Tax Consultant’s Negligence and Rural Location Causes 253-Day Appeal Delay: ITAT Remands Cash Deposit Case for fresh Adjudication [Read Order] Tax Consultant’s Negligence and Rural Location Causes 253-Day Appeal Delay: ITAT Remands Cash Deposit Case for fresh Adjudication [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/08/500x300_2074308-tax-consultants-negligence-tax-consultants-negligence-and-rural-location-causes-taxscan.webp)
Tax Consultant’s Negligence and Rural Location Causes 253-Day Appeal Delay: ITAT Remands Cash Deposit Case for fresh Adjudication [Read Order]
The Bangalore Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) has condoned a delay of 253 days in filing an appeal and observed that the delay...


![Income Tax Dept Cannot Issue Notice in Name of Deceased When Earlier Court Order Recognised Legal Heir: Calcutta HC [Read Order] Income Tax Dept Cannot Issue Notice in Name of Deceased When Earlier Court Order Recognised Legal Heir: Calcutta HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/07/250x150_2074001-calcutta-high-court-notice-income-tax-dept-taxscan.webp)
![S. 80P Deduction Disallowance: ITAT rejects Death of CA being Not Valid Reason for 388 Day Delay for Appeal [Read Order] S. 80P Deduction Disallowance: ITAT rejects Death of CA being Not Valid Reason for 388 Day Delay for Appeal [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/07/250x150_2073931-s-80p-deduction-itat-ca-taxscan.webp)
![CA Only Acts as AR, not Automatically Entitled to Receive ITAT Orders Behalf of Assessee Without Specific Authorisation: Bombay HC [Read Order] CA Only Acts as AR, not Automatically Entitled to Receive ITAT Orders Behalf of Assessee Without Specific Authorisation: Bombay HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/06/250x150_2073612-automatically-entitled-to-receive-itat-orders-itat-orders-taxscan.webp)
![Half-Yearly Income Tax Case Digest: ITAT Decisions 2025 [Part X] Half-Yearly Income Tax Case Digest: ITAT Decisions 2025 [Part X]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/02/250x150_2072310-half-yearly-income-tax-case-diges-itat-decisions-2025-part-x-taxscan.webp)


![Half-Yearly Income Tax Case Digest: ITAT Decisions 2025 [Part IX] Half-Yearly Income Tax Case Digest: ITAT Decisions 2025 [Part IX]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/02/500x300_2072292-itat-9.webp)
![Half-Yearly Income Tax Case Digest: ITAT Decisions 2025 [Part VIII] Half-Yearly Income Tax Case Digest: ITAT Decisions 2025 [Part VIII]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/02/500x300_2072304-half-yearly-income-tax-case-digest-itat-decisions-2025-part-8.webp)
![Salaried Taxpayer Wins ₹1.46 Lakh Income Tax Penalty Case Despite Misreporting: Here’s How [Read Order] Salaried Taxpayer Wins ₹1.46 Lakh Income Tax Penalty Case Despite Misreporting: Here’s How [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/06/500x300_2073465-salaried-taxpayer-income-tax-penalty-income-tax-taxscan.webp)

