Indian Subsidiary’s Classification as Dependent Agent PE in Software Sales: ITAT Sets Aside AO’s Decision [Read Order]

It was noted that the transaction had already undergone a transfer pricing adjustment, making the Dependent Agent PE issue irrelevant. Since the transfer pricing order was presented as additional evidence but not verified by lower authorities, hence the matter was set aside for reconsideration
Indian Subsidiary - Software Sales - Agent PE - taxscan

The Bangalore Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) set aside the Assessing Officer’s ( AO ) decision classifying the Indian subsidiary as a Dependent Agent Permanent Establishment ( PE ) in software sales and remanded the matter for fresh examination.

QlikTech International AB ,appellant-assessee,is a foreign company selling software products. Its Indian subsidiary, QlikTech India Private Limited, paid Rs. 55.91 crore after deducting Tax Deducted at Source(TDS) of Rs. 5.59 crore, as shown in Form 26AS for the relevant year. However, the assessee did not include this payment in its taxable income and claimed a refund of the deducted TDS while filing its return.

Complete FAQs on GST Amnesty Scheme 2024 Click Here

During the assessment, the AO found that based on agreements between the assessee and its Indian subsidiary, the subsidiary handled tasks like finding customers, negotiating prices, and finalizing contracts for the appellant’s product sales in India.

The AO determined that the Indian subsidiary was a dependent agency permanent establishment of the assessee. As a result, the AO taxed the assessee’s income in India at 30% on ₹96.87 crore from product sales. This decision was upheld by the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP).

How Does the Supreme Court Shape Tax Laws? Discover Landmark Rulings! Click Here

The assessee appealed before the tribunal.

Read More: Amount received by Adobe from Supply of Software and Automated Services not Taxable in India When Profit not attributed to PE: ITAT

The two member bench comprising Keshav Dubey(Judicial Member) and Waseem Ahmed(Accountant Member) reviewed the arguments and records and found that the transaction between the appellant and its Indian subsidiary had already undergone Transfer Pricing Officer  (TPO) adjustment. Since the sale was assessed under transfer pricing, the issue of a dependent agency permanent establishment did not arise.

Complete FAQs on GST Amnesty Scheme 2024 Click Here

As the Transfer Pricing(TP) order was submitted as additional evidence and not verified by lower authorities, the ITAT set aside the issue back to the AO for fresh examination.

In short, the appeal filed by the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes.

Subscribe Taxscan Premium to view the Judgment

Support our journalism by subscribing to Taxscan premium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates

taxscan-loader