The Kolkata Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) recently deleted the addition of Government grants which cannot be treated as corpus or income.
The assessee, Howrah Improvement Trust, is the State Level Nodal Agency of Government of West Bengal constituted under Howrah Improvement Trust Act for construction of Roads, Bridges, Sewerage Systems, Buildings, Playgrounds, Auditoriums, Construction of Buildings for Educational Institutions etc on behalf of Government of West Bengal within the district of Howrah.
The Trust functions under the Urban Development Department of Government of West Bengal. The Trust receives specific earmarked grants from Government of West Bengal through Urban Development Department for implementation of various infrastructural projects within the district of Howrah.
The accounts of the Trust are to be maintained as per Government Rules and audit is done by CAG. The assessee-Trust is also registered under section 12AA of the Income Tax Act vide order issued by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption).
During the previous year relevant to the assessment year under consideration, the assessee received general-purpose fund and specific purpose fund from the Government of West Bengal.
The general-purpose fund, which was granted to the assessee primarily for funding the administrative expense such as payment of salary, bonus etc., was duly credited to the Income & Expenditure Account of the assessee and the same was offered to income tax for the relevant assessment year in the statement showing computation of total income of the appellant.
The specific purpose fund such as fund granted to the assessee for construction of fly over or flood shelter or school building etc. was directly taken to the Balance Sheet as it constituted capital/corpus of the Trust and hence, the same was not offered to tax as income of the Trust as per the provisions of Section 11(1)(d) of the Income Tax Act .
During the assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer observed that an amount of Rs.2,50,15,352/- was directly credited to the balance sheet without routing the same through profit and loss account.
The Assessing Officer observed that as per of Section 12(1) and Section 11(1)(d) of the Income Tax Act, the voluntary contributions made with a specific direction that the contribution shall form part of the corpus of the trust can be treated as corpus donation and the same will not be treated as income of the trust/institution.
However, any other donation/grant is not a corpus donation. He further observed that in the instant case, there was no express direction either from the Government of West Bengal or Government of India that the funds received by the assessee would form part of the corpus of the assessee-institution.
He further observed that the basic nature of the grant was that it was meant for application and not for keeping with the assessee’s corpus. He further observed that the assessee did not apply the income in the year in which the same was received.
If the assessee wished to apply any income of this year in the next year then it must take recourse to explanation 2 to Section 11(1) of the Act by exercising option. If it wanted to defer the application of receipts beyond one year then it must set apart such income for specific purposes under Section 11(2) of the Income Tax Act by furnishing Form 10.
In absence of such option, the assessee had to apply 85% of its entire income received during the year within the year itself, to avail exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act. Any shortfall in applying 85% of income, was squarely taxable in absence of option vide Explanation 2 to Section 11(1) or claim of set apart vide Section 11(2) of the Act.
In this instant case, no such option was exercised or Form 10 was submitted. The Assessing Officer therefore, added back the Government grant received by the assessee of Rs.25,01,54,352/- as income for the year under consideration. The CIT(A) also confirmed the additions made by the Assessing Officer.
Counsel for the assessee submitted that the aforesaid grants received by the assessee did not constitute income of the assessee. The Assessee was only an executing agency of the infrastructure projects for which specific grants were given by the Government. Therefore, the same did not constitute income of the assessee and hence was not routed through profit and loss account, he submitted.
The bench, consisting of two members, Judicial Member Sanjay Garg and Accountant Member Manish borad observed that the grants were given to the assessee for implementation of various infrastructure schemes. It was further observed that the grants received by the assessee/state agency did not belong to the assessee.
The grants did not form corpus of the assessee nor it was income of the assessee under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act. Such grants were not the donations or voluntary contributions under Section 12 of the Income Tax Act. It had also been held time and again that the entries in the books of accounts do not decide the nature of the receipts.
The assessee was not authorized to utilize the said grants for any other purposes other than for which such grants were received by the assessee. The unutilized grants have been refunded back by the assessee to the Government. The assessee has also furnished the details of the funds received by the assessee for specific infrastructure projects, the details of utilization of such funds for those specific infrastructure projects.
In view of this, the grants received by the assessee for specific infrastructure projects which has also been utilized for those specific purposes only and since the assessee was not authorized to use the said grants for any other purpose and further that the unused funds have been returned to the Government, therefore, the aforesaid grants, in our view, do not constitute the income of the assessee.
The appeal filed by the assessee was allowed in result.
Subscribe Taxscan Premium to view the JudgmentSupport our journalism by subscribing to Taxscan premium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates
