Limitation commences from Date of uploading Order when Matter Heard but no Order Pronounced on Same Day: SC [Read Judgement]

The limitation commences from the date of uploading order when matter is heard but no order pronounced on the same day, rules SC
Limitation commences from Date of uploading Matter Heard - Pronounced on Same Day - SC - TAXSCAN

The Supreme Court in a recent decision observed that the limitation commences from the date of uploading order when matter is heard but no order pronounced on the same day.

The respondent 1, Vistra ITCL (India) Limited filed an application under Section 7 of the IBC seeking the initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against Evirant Developers Private Limited, the Corporate Debtor. The appellant is a former director of the Corporate Debtor, who alleges that the Section 7 application filed by respondent 1 is based on collusion with the various respondents, including respondent 2 and respondent 3, who are former directors of the Corporate Debtor.

The appellant filed an application for condonation of delay along with the appeal. The appellant contended that (i) the appellant became aware of the contents of the order only on 30 May 2023 and the limitation period should run from this date; (ii) the NCLAT was closed for summer vacations between 05 June 2023 and 02 July 2023 and this period should be excluded from the calculation of limitation.

The question that arises in the facts of the present case, therefore, is when is an order deemed to be pronounced. The National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 20167 provide guidance in this regard. Rule 89(1) of the NCLT Rules indicates that when NCLAT registry publishes its cause list, a distinction is drawn between cases listed for pronouncement of orders and other cases.

A Three Judge Bench comprising Chief Justice Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Justice J B Pardiwala and Justice Manoj Misra observed that “The period of limitation began to run on 30 May 2023. The 30- day limitation period provided in Section 61(2) of the IBC concluded on 29 June 2023. Though the appeal was filed beyond the period of thirty days, it was within the condonable period of fifteen days. We are of the considered view that the appeal should be restored to the NCLAT for reconsidering whether the appellant has shown sufficient cause for condoning the delay beyond thirty days.”

Subscribe Taxscan Premium to view the Judgment

Support our journalism by subscribing to Taxscan premium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates

taxscan-loader