Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
![Tax Amount to be indicated in the Tax Invoice under Sec 33: Karnataka HC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Tax-Invoice-Karnataka-High-Court-Taxscan-1.jpg "Tax Amount to be indicated in the Tax Invoice under Sec 33: Karnataka HC [Read Judgment]")
Tax Amount to be indicated in the Tax Invoice under Sec 33: Karnataka HC [Read Judgment]
The Karnataka High Court ruled that the obligation under Section 33 of the Act provides that while raising an invoice, the amount of tax is to be...
![CBDT extends due date of Filing Tax Audit Reports and ITRs in Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Jammu-Commissionerate-Notification-Taxscan.jpg "CBDT extends due date of Filing Tax Audit Reports and ITRs in Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh [Read Order]")
Pendency of Representation Filed by Assessee not a bar to issuing Pre-revision Notices by Department: Madras HC [Read Judgment]
The Madras High Court in its case of Tvl Sri Kumaran Mills v Assistant Commissioner held that where a representation had been filed by the taxpayer before the relevant authority by the assessee and...
![Pendency of Representation Filed by Assessee not a bar to issuing Pre-revision Notices by Department: Madras HC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Reassessment-Madras-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "Pendency of Representation Filed by Assessee not a bar to issuing Pre-revision Notices by Department: Madras HC [Read Judgment]")
Penalty u/s 112 Can’t be imposed unless Evidences to Show Prior Knowledge of Fraud and Wrongful Intent: CESTAT [Read Order]
In a recent case the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ), Kolkata held that it is a settled law that penalty under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962 cannot be imposed...
![Penalty u/s 112 Can’t be imposed unless Evidences to Show Prior Knowledge of Fraud and Wrongful Intent: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg "Penalty u/s 112 Can’t be imposed unless Evidences to Show Prior Knowledge of Fraud and Wrongful Intent: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Denial of Benefit of ITC to Buyers of Flats would amount to Profiteering: NAA [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Anti-Profiteering-Charges-NAA-GST-Realtor-Firm-Taxscan.jpg "Denial of Benefit of ITC to Buyers of Flats would amount to Profiteering: NAA [Read Order]")
![Direction to Assessee to exclude 6 comparables and thereafter Compute ALP: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Contractual-Obligation-ITAT-Taxscan.jpg "Direction to Assessee to exclude 6 comparables and thereafter Compute ALP: ITAT [Read Order]")
GST Evasion: Patiala House Courts allows Bail on Fraudulent Utilization of ITC amounting to Rs 33.75 cr [Read Order]
The Patiala House Courts in the case of CGST v Sanjay Jaglan allowed bail application on fraudulent utilization of ITC amounting to more than Rs 33.75 crores. He present order has been made against...
![GST Evasion: Patiala House Courts allows Bail on Fraudulent Utilization of ITC amounting to Rs 33.75 cr [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Patiala-House-Courts-GST-Evasion-Taxscan.jpg "GST Evasion: Patiala House Courts allows Bail on Fraudulent Utilization of ITC amounting to Rs 33.75 cr [Read Order]")