The Madras High Court ordered a pre-deposit of 10% for contesting the Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) demand which confirmed failure to respond to the Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) proceedings
The Madras High Court held that the documents such as GSTR 9, GSTR 9C, and Income Tax records alone are insufficient to establish that Goods Transport Services fall under the Reverse Charge Mechanism ( RCM
The Madras High Court quashed the Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) assessment orders issued without considering the interim reply submitted by the petitioner/taxpayer. The court directed the GST officers to take up the
The Madras High Court orders pre-deposit of 10% of the disputed demand to nullify the contested order. The court's decision came in light of the assessee's non-participation in the Goods and Services Tax ( GST
The Madras High Court directed the Income Tax department to open the portal for the petitioner. The bench quashed the assessment order adding Rs. 16 crores as unexplained expenditure without providing reasonable time to explain.
GST registration is the pivotal process of acquiring a distinct identification number for businesses obligated to pay Goods and Services Tax ( GST ). Introduced in 2017, the GST has simplified indirect taxes. Prior to
The Madras High Court has issued a directive for the reconsideration of a case concerning the confirmation of tax liability due to a discrepancy between GSTR 3B and GSTR 1 returns. This decision stems from
The Goods and Services Tax Network ( GSTN ) has launched the revamped Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) Portal on 3rd May, 2024. The Goods and Services Tax Network ( GSTN ) had
Within the first month of Assessment Year 2024-25 (FY25), the Income Tax (I-Tax filingsT) Department has already processed a substantial number of returns, receiving around 6 lakh filings. Reports indicate that nearly two-thirds of these
The Madras High Court granted the petitioner the opportunity to contest a Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) demand, provided they make a 10% pre-deposit. This decision arised from a situation where the petitioner's
The Madras High Court allowed the petitioner to contest the Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) Liability on a pre-deposit of 10% of disputed tax demand. The bench observed that the liability was confirmed
The Madras High Court directed the 10% pre-deposit condition for challenging the order where the petitioner lacked Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) proceedings on discrepancy between GSTR 3B and GSTR 2A as notices
The Madras High Court remanded the Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) demand for reconsideration on 10% pre-deposit condition as rectification was filed on error in reporting outward supplies and Input Tax Credit (
The Calcutta High Court has ruled that the onus of inquiry regarding non-remittance of Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) to the state treasury falls upon the seller, particularly in cases where the service
The section 45 of Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) 2002 lays down stringent criteria for bail in cases related to money laundering. However, amidst its rigour, the provision also incorporates a crucial exception, especially