Top
Begin typing your search above and press return to search.

Personal Account of Club’s President Cannot Be Frozen for Club’s Default in GST Dues: Madras HC Orders De-freezing [Read Order]

Liability under GST must rest with the taxable entity in this case, the club and not with its office-bearers in their personal capacity, unless specific wrongdoing is established.

Personal Account - Club’s President - Club’s - GST Dues - Madras HC Orders De-freezing - TAXSCAN
X

Personal Account - Club’s President - Club’s - GST Dues - Madras HC Orders De-freezing - TAXSCAN

Your free access to Taxscan has Expired


To read the article, get a premium account.


Taxscan Premium

Why should you subscribe?
  • Enjoy our website without interruptions from advertisements
  • Receive Daily newsletters
  • Receive realtime Telegram/Whatsapp news updates
  • Download original Judgements / Order / Notifications / Circulars, etc
  • Enjoy exclusive entry fees to Simplified series. (Webinars, Seminars, masterclasses, etc.)
  ₹2299 + GST for 1 year
Subscribe Now
Already a member? Log in here

The Madras High Court has held that the personal bank account of an individual cannot be frozen for the Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) liabilities of a club, even if the individual happens to be the president of the said club.

The petitioner, M. Jaiganesh, serving as the president of Dayton Club, approached the High Court seeking the de-freezing of his personal account held in Indian Bank. The Dayton Club, a separate legal entity, holds its own Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN), PAN, and maintains a separate bank account with ICICI Bank.

Also read: Delay cannot be condoned in an appeal u/s 107 of CGST Act: Delhi HC Dismisses Review Petition [Read Order]

Authorities had rightfully started recovery proceedings and attached the club's bank account due to the tax failure. However, the tax authorities went ahead and frozen the petitioner's personal account as well, noting that the petitioner's name was listed alongside the club in the assessment order.

GST READY RECKONER: Complete Topic wise Circulars, Instructions & Guidelines Click here

The petitioner contended that his personal account had no nexus to the club's financial transactions or tax liability, and that such attachment was arbitrary and unlawful.

Also read: GST ITC denied on Non-Compliance of Circular: Madras HC grants Hearing Opportunity Conditionally [Read Order]

Justice S. Srimathy concurred with the petitioner’s argument, stating that liability under GST must rest with the taxable entity in this case, the club and not with its office-bearers in their personal capacity, unless specific wrongdoing is established.

GST READY RECKONER: Complete Topic wise Circulars, Instructions & Guidelines Click here

Accordingly, the Court quashed the impugned order to the extent that it fixed personal liability on the petitioner and directed the respondent bank to immediately lift the freeze on the petitioner’s personal account.

With this direction, the writ petition was allowed, and all connected miscellaneous petitions were closed, with no order as to costs.

Also read: No GST on Rotary Club Membership and Admission Fees: AAAR [Read Order]

To Read the full text of the Order CLICK HERE

Support our journalism by subscribing to Taxscan premium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates


Next Story

Related Stories

Advertisement
Advertisement
All Rights Reserved. Copyright @2019