Chartered Accountants (CAs) are expected to maintain the highest standards of ethical and professional conduct. Professional misconduct in accounting can arise from actions that compromise these standards, impacting both individuals and the profession’s reputation. This article delves deep into the legal framework for professional misconduct among CAs, cases related to these issues, and the resulting consequences.
The Framework of Professional Misconduct: The Chartered Accountants Act, 1949
The Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 establishes the ethical standards and disciplinary framework for CAs in India. It outlines various forms of professional misconduct and empowers the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) to investigate complaints, enforce disciplinary actions, and safeguard public interest in financial reporting.
The Act defines “professional misconduct” through Sections 21 and 22, while the First Schedule details behaviors violating ethical and professional standards. The Act also empowers ICAI’s Disciplinary Committee to impose penalties, from reprimands and fines to suspension or expulsion, depending on the severity of the violation.
Get a Copy of Master GST Notice Replies – Drafting 20 Notices, Including Appeals – Register Now, Click here
Clause 1 of Part 1, First Schedule – Misconduct in Relation to Chartered Accountants in Practice
Cases
Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, New Delhi v. Mani S. Abraham (Kerala High Court, 2000)
The complaint alleged that the respondent disclosed confidential information obtained during audits to third parties, including high-profile individuals such as the Prime Minister and the Finance Minister, without the bank’s consent. This was deemed a violation under Clause (1) of Part I of the Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, which prohibits disclosure of client information. The Disciplinary Committee found the respondent guilty of misconduct but acknowledged his disturbed mental state and lack of malicious intent.
Get a Copy of Master GST Notice Replies – Drafting 20 Notices, Including Appeals – Register Now, Click here
The court agreed with the committee’s findings, underscoring the importance of confidentiality in the CA profession as a matter of trust and ethical obligation. However, due to the respondent’s circumstances and the passage of time, the court opted to file the proceedings without imposing additional penalties. This case highlights the weight given to confidentiality in professional conduct and the court’s discretionary power to consider mitigating factors in determining appropriate disciplinary measures.
Institute of Chartered Accountants of India v. V.K. Verma (Delhi High Court, 1964)
The case originated from a letter alleging that Mr. Verma’s firm was serving as auditors for both a bank and one of its borrower companies, creating a potential conflict of interest. In addition, discrepancies were found in the financial statements of one audited company, where transactions from a branch office were omitted. Although the Disciplinary Committee initially found Mr. Verma’s explanations insufficient and recommended a two-year suspension, the Delhi High Court held that charges must be specific and based on clear evidence.
Get a Copy of Master GST Notice Replies – Drafting 20 Notices, Including Appeals – Register Now, Click here
The Court underscored the importance of procedural fairness and quashed the findings, emphasizing that additional charges cannot be introduced during disciplinary proceedings without adequate notice and opportunity for the respondent to prepare a defense. This case highlights the significance of due process in professional disciplinary actions and the necessity for clear, well-founded allegations in cases of professional misconduct.
I.C.A.I. v. Tarachand Surana (Rajasthan High Court, May 10, 2024)
The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India initiated disciplinary proceedings against Chartered Accountant Shri Tarachand Surana for failing to adequately investigate and report on financial transactions related to a Provident Fund, which involved loans by trustees to a company. The court found Surana guilty of professional misconduct under Clause (o) of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, stating that he breached his duty to the Fund’s beneficiaries by not ensuring accurate financial reporting. Although Surana issued an apology, the court deemed the misconduct serious, issuing a reprimand and ordering him to pay the costs incurred by ICAI in the proceedings. This case highlights the expectation that Chartered Accountants must adhere to high standards of accountability and diligence in their professional roles.
Other misconduct
H.G. Nagaraju, Bengaluru. Vs CA. Lingaraj M. Pujari (M.No.225579),
The best example of other misconduct involved Mr. Lingaraj, a CA who issued a certificate at the request of a company where another CA, Mr. Nagaraju, was employed as a financial officer. The certificate contained vague language addressed “to whomsoever it may concern,” which meant it could be shared with anyone, including third parties, banks, or other institutions. This wording allowed the company to use the certificate to cast doubt on Mr. Nagaraju’s conduct, potentially harming his reputation.
The ICAI ruled that this generic language was misleading and irresponsible. The vague addressee made it unclear whom the certificate was meant for and could allow it to be used in ways that were unintended. The ICAI classified this as “other misconduct,” reprimanding Mr. Lingaraj for failing to uphold the profession’s standards in issuing certifications.
Get a Copy of Master GST Notice Replies – Drafting 20 Notices, Including Appeals – Register Now, Click here
Consequences of Professional Misconduct
The penalties for professional misconduct in the CA profession are significant, acting as a deterrent to ensure adherence to ethical standards. Possible consequences include:
Support our journalism by subscribing to Taxscan premium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates
