Relief to Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited: CESTAT allows Refund for Education Cess and Higher Education Cess while Exempting Excise Duty [Read Order]
The tribunal found that the Apex Court in the case of SRD Nutrients Pvt Ltd which allowed the refund of education cess as the exemption was on the excise duty
![Relief to Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited: CESTAT allows Refund for Education Cess and Higher Education Cess while Exempting Excise Duty [Read Order] Relief to Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited: CESTAT allows Refund for Education Cess and Higher Education Cess while Exempting Excise Duty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Customs-Duty-Sun-Pharmaceuticals-Sun-Pharmaceuticals-fine-case-Sun-Pharmaceuticals-customs-case-taxscan-2.jpg)
In a ruling in favour of Sun Pharma Laboratories Ltd , the Chandigarh bench of the Customs, Excise And Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) allowed the refund for Education Cess and Higher Education Cess while exempting excise duty.
Finance Ministry Revises Customs Tariffs on Gold, Silver, and Crude Oil w.e.f. May 1st [Read Notification]
Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited, the appellant are engaged in manufacture of P&P Medicines falling under Tariff Heading
Nos. 30049099 & 30039090 of First Schedule to Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The appellant were operating under area based exemption Notification No. 56/2002-CE dated 14.11.2002. In these two appeals, demand has been raised by issuing show cause notices for recovery of refund claim rejected by the jurisdictional Central Excise officer on the ground of rejection of refund of education cess and secondary & higher education cess.
Stay Updated with the Latest Audit Report Formats & Audit Trials Requirements! Click here
The original authority confirmed the demand by holding that education cess and secondary & higher education cess are not duties of excise and therefore, for payment of education cess and secondary & higher education cess, CENVAT Credit of basic excise duty cannot be used. Aggrieved by the order of original authority, the appellant filed appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals), who has rejected their appeal.
S.43B Disallowance not Applicable When No Deduction Claimed and Liability Reported as Current Liability: ITAT [Read Order]
Consultant for the appellant submitted that the impugned order is not sustainable in law and is liable to be set aside as the same has been passed without properly appreciating the facts and the law and by ignoring the binding judicial precedents. On the other hand, the Authorized Representative for the Revenue reiterates the findings of the impugned order.
After considering the submissions made by both the parties and perusal of the material on record, we find that the issue involved in the instant case is no more res integra and has been settled in favour of the appellant in their own case for the previous period as cited supra.
ICAI Releases 10th Edition of GST Acts and Rules â Bare Law with New Amendments [Read Bare Law]
The Commissioner (Appeals) has rejected the appeal of the appellant by holding that the appellant are not entitled to refund of education cess and secondary & higher education cess.The tribunal found that the Apex Court in the case of SRD Nutrients Pvt Ltd which allowed the refund as the exemption was on the excise duty.
The two member bench of S. S. Garg, Member (Judicial) and P. Anjani Kumar, Member (Technical) set aside the impugned order and allowed both the appeals of the appellant.
To Read the full text of the Order CLICK HERE
Support our journalism by subscribing to Taxscan premium. Follow us on Telegram for quick updates