Sandhra Suresh
![Failure to Opt u/s 115BAA and File Form 10‑IC Bars Concessional Tax: Supreme Court upholds Delhi HC Order Against Appellant [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/17/500x300_2105901-supreme-court-upholds-delhi-hc-order-against-appellant-taxscan.webp "Failure to Opt u/s 115BAA and File Form 10‑IC Bars Concessional Tax: Supreme Court upholds Delhi HC Order Against Appellant [Read Order]")
Failure to Opt u/s 115BAA and File Form 10‑IC Bars Concessional Tax: Supreme Court upholds Delhi HC Order Against Appellant [Read Order]
The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's Special Leave Petition, refusing to interfere with the Delhi High Court’s order. The bench held that the...
![Delhi HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in ₹2.4 Cr Foreign Cigarette Smuggling Case: SC Admits SLP Challenging Rejection [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/17/250x150_2105957-foreign-cigarette-smuggling-case-taxscan.webp "Delhi HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in ₹2.4 Cr Foreign Cigarette Smuggling Case: SC Admits SLP Challenging Rejection [Read Order]")
![Wrong Tax Advice Not a ‘Sufficient Cause’ for 1,370-Day Delay: ITAT Says Assessee Cannot Shift Entire Blame to Consultant [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/14/250x150_2105140-income-tax-taxscan.webp "Wrong Tax Advice Not a ‘Sufficient Cause’ for 1,370-Day Delay: ITAT Says Assessee Cannot Shift Entire Blame to Consultant [Read Order]")
![Reassessment in Wrong Year and Notice Beyond Limitation: ITAT Quashes ₹2.13 Cr Additions u/s 50C [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/13/250x150_2104877-reassessment-itat-taxscan.webp "Reassessment in Wrong Year and Notice Beyond Limitation: ITAT Quashes ₹2.13 Cr Additions u/s 50C [Read Order]")
Promotional Expenses for Dealer Scheme Recognised as Liquor Business Expenditure: ITAT Deletes ₹16.22 Lakh Addition [Read Order]
The Nagpur bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has allowed the appeal of the assessee for A.Y. 2014–15, holding that ₹16.22 lakh claimed as promotional expenses under a dealer scheme were...
![Promotional Expenses for Dealer Scheme Recognised as Liquor Business Expenditure: ITAT Deletes ₹16.22 Lakh Addition [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/13/500x300_2104839-promotional-expenses-dealer-scheme-liquor-business-expenditure-itat-taxscan.webp "Promotional Expenses for Dealer Scheme Recognised as Liquor Business Expenditure: ITAT Deletes ₹16.22 Lakh Addition [Read Order]")
Additions on Cash Deposits and Property Purchase Made Without Proper Appraisal of Evidence: ITAT Orders Fresh Verification [Read Order]
The Nagpur Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has set aside additions made under Sections 69A, 69C, and 56(2)(x) of the Income Tax Act against an individual taxpayer, holding that the...
![Additions on Cash Deposits and Property Purchase Made Without Proper Appraisal of Evidence: ITAT Orders Fresh Verification [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/13/500x300_2104797-whatsapp-image-2025-11-13-at-103613-am.webp "Additions on Cash Deposits and Property Purchase Made Without Proper Appraisal of Evidence: ITAT Orders Fresh Verification [Read Order]")
GST Demand Beyond SCN Scope Violates S. 75(7): Allahabad HC Quashes ₹3.04 Cr Demand Order [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court has quashed a GST demand order that exceeded the scope of the original show cause notice, citing a violation of Section 75(7) of...
![GST Demand Beyond SCN Scope Violates S. 75(7): Allahabad HC Quashes ₹3.04 Cr Demand Order [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/11/500x300_2104106-gst-demand-scn-scope-violates-s-757-allahabad-hc-demand-order-taxscan.jfif "GST Demand Beyond SCN Scope Violates S. 75(7): Allahabad HC Quashes ₹3.04 Cr Demand Order [Read Order]")
Misclassification of Real Estate Income as LTCG u/s 50C: ITAT Remands ₹21.24 Lakh Addition for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Nagpur Bench, has set aside the ex parte order passed by the CIT(A) and remanded the matter to the AO for fresh adjudication on the ground that income from...
![Misclassification of Real Estate Income as LTCG u/s 50C: ITAT Remands ₹21.24 Lakh Addition for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/14/500x300_2105167-real-estate-income-itat-.webp "Misclassification of Real Estate Income as LTCG u/s 50C: ITAT Remands ₹21.24 Lakh Addition for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]")
CESTAT Rules Reassessment of Copper Busbars Exceeded Jurisdiction: SC to Hear Customs Appeal [Read Judgement]
In a classification dispute involving polyester bed sheets, the Supreme Court of India has admitted a civil appeal filed by the Customs against the respondent challenging the relief granted by the...
![CESTAT Rules Reassessment of Copper Busbars Exceeded Jurisdiction: SC to Hear Customs Appeal [Read Judgement]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/13/500x300_2104913-cestat-mumbai-customs-appeal-reassessment-taxscan.webp "CESTAT Rules Reassessment of Copper Busbars Exceeded Jurisdiction: SC to Hear Customs Appeal [Read Judgement]")
CESTAT Rules Reliance’s Indonesian Steam Coal Imports Not Overvalued, Supreme Court to Hear Customs Appeal [Read Order]
In a significant development in the Reliance’s Indonesian steam coal valuation controversy, the Supreme Court is to hear a customs appeal filed by the Revenue against a detailed final order passed...
![CESTAT Rules Reliance’s Indonesian Steam Coal Imports Not Overvalued, Supreme Court to Hear Customs Appeal [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/13/500x300_2104835-cestat-cestat-rules-coal-imports-reliances-indonesian-supreme-court-taxscan.webp "CESTAT Rules Reliance’s Indonesian Steam Coal Imports Not Overvalued, Supreme Court to Hear Customs Appeal [Read Order]")