Sandhra Suresh
![Unsecured Loan Genuine and Merely Carried Forward from Earlier Year, Not Fresh Borrowing: ITAT Deletes Rs. 2.50 Cr Income Tax Addition u/s 68 [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/23/500x300_2099394-unsecured-loan-fresh-borrowing-loan-itat-income-tax-addition-income-tax-taxscan.webp "Unsecured Loan Genuine and Merely Carried Forward from Earlier Year, Not Fresh Borrowing: ITAT Deletes Rs. 2.50 Cr Income Tax Addition u/s 68 [Read Order]")
Unsecured Loan Genuine and Merely Carried Forward from Earlier Year, Not Fresh Borrowing: ITAT Deletes Rs. 2.50 Cr Income Tax Addition u/s 68 [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) allowed the appeal of the assessee, observing that the unsecured loan was carried...
![Unexplained Cash Addition u/s 69 Deleted by CIT(A) on Evidence of Source of Share Application Money: ITAT Remands Matter for Fresh Verification of Source [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/23/250x150_2099387-unexplained-cash-itat-fresh-verification-taxscan.webp "Unexplained Cash Addition u/s 69 Deleted by CIT(A) on Evidence of Source of Share Application Money: ITAT Remands Matter for Fresh Verification of Source [Read Order]")
![Co-operative Society Eligible for 80P(2)(d) Deduction on Interest from Co-operative Bank Investments: ITAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/23/250x150_2099348-co-operative-society-co-operative-bank-investments-itat-taxscan.webp "Co-operative Society Eligible for 80P(2)(d) Deduction on Interest from Co-operative Bank Investments: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Non-receipt of Notices and Lack of Digital Access: ITAT remands ₹34.77 Lakh LTCG Addition as Equitable Relief [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/23/250x150_2099370-lack-digital-access-itat-lakh-ltcg-taxscan.webp "Non-receipt of Notices and Lack of Digital Access: ITAT remands ₹34.77 Lakh LTCG Addition as Equitable Relief [Read Order]")
![No Disallowance u/s 14A r/w Rule 8D can be Made When No Exempt Income Earned: ITAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/23/250x150_2099391-no-disallowance-no-exempt-income-earned-itat-taxscan.webp "No Disallowance u/s 14A r/w Rule 8D can be Made When No Exempt Income Earned: ITAT [Read Order]")
Estimated Addition of Rs. 42.37 Lakh Bogus Purchases Insufficient for Penalty u/s 271(1)(c): ITAT dismisses Revenue Appeal [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dismissed the revenue’s appeal and upheld the deletion of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) on the confirmed addition of 7.5% of...
![Estimated Addition of Rs. 42.37 Lakh Bogus Purchases Insufficient for Penalty u/s 271(1)(c): ITAT dismisses Revenue Appeal [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/23/500x300_2099339-estimated-addition-bogus-purchases-penalty-itat-revenue-appeal-taxscan.webp "Estimated Addition of Rs. 42.37 Lakh Bogus Purchases Insufficient for Penalty u/s 271(1)(c): ITAT dismisses Revenue Appeal [Read Order]")
Reason for Default Irrelevant: NCLT Admits Section 7 Petition Rejecting COVID-19 & Technical Defences [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) admitted a section 7 petition rejecting COVID-19 and technical defences and observed that default of payment is enough, then the reason...
![Reason for Default Irrelevant: NCLT Admits Section 7 Petition Rejecting COVID-19 & Technical Defences [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/23/500x300_2099290-nclt-covid-19-technical-defences-taxscan.webp "Reason for Default Irrelevant: NCLT Admits Section 7 Petition Rejecting COVID-19 & Technical Defences [Read Order]")
![No Illegibilities u/s 11 of IBC: NCLT Admits CIRP u/s 10 Amid COVID-19 Losses [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/23/500x300_2099306-nclt-cirp-taxscan.webp "No Illegibilities u/s 11 of IBC: NCLT Admits CIRP u/s 10 Amid COVID-19 Losses [Read Order]")
Rs 1.90 Crore FDR Renewal Not a Fresh Investment: ITAT Upholds Deletion of Addition u/s 69 [Read Order]
The Delhi bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal deleted the addition of Rs 1.90 Crore under Section 69, observing that the amount was a renewal of earlier FDs made to secure bank guarantees and no...
![Rs 1.90 Crore FDR Renewal Not a Fresh Investment: ITAT Upholds Deletion of Addition u/s 69 [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/23/500x300_2099293-fdr-renewal-fresh-investment-itat-taxscan.webp "Rs 1.90 Crore FDR Renewal Not a Fresh Investment: ITAT Upholds Deletion of Addition u/s 69 [Read Order]")
Payments for Bandwidth Services Not Royalty under India–UAE DTAA: ITAT Mumbai Deletes ₹1.55 Crore Addition [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that payments received by UAE-based iSAT Africa Ltd. for providing VSAT bandwidth and network connectivity to BT Global Communications...
![Payments for Bandwidth Services Not Royalty under India–UAE DTAA: ITAT Mumbai Deletes ₹1.55 Crore Addition [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/22/500x300_2099046-india-uae-dtaa-taxscan.webp "Payments for Bandwidth Services Not Royalty under India–UAE DTAA: ITAT Mumbai Deletes ₹1.55 Crore Addition [Read Order]")
Deemed Dividend u/s 2(22)(e) Not Attractable Where Borrower is Not Shareholder: ITAT Deletes Rs. 49.56 Lakh Addition [Read Order]
The Indore bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the addition of Rs. 49,56,118/- made by the AO as deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e) was unsustainable, as the assessee-company...
![Deemed Dividend u/s 2(22)(e) Not Attractable Where Borrower is Not Shareholder: ITAT Deletes Rs. 49.56 Lakh Addition [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/22/500x300_2099059-deemed-dividend-taxscan.webp "Deemed Dividend u/s 2(22)(e) Not Attractable Where Borrower is Not Shareholder: ITAT Deletes Rs. 49.56 Lakh Addition [Read Order]")
NCLT Upholds Rs. 1.03 Crore Operational Debt Despite 24% Interest Challenge, Initiates CIRP u/s 9 [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) held that under Section 9(5) of the IBC, 2016, a dispute limited to interest does not amount to a pre-existing dispute and therefore...
![NCLT Upholds Rs. 1.03 Crore Operational Debt Despite 24% Interest Challenge, Initiates CIRP u/s 9 [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/22/500x300_2099040-operational-debt-taxscan.webp "NCLT Upholds Rs. 1.03 Crore Operational Debt Despite 24% Interest Challenge, Initiates CIRP u/s 9 [Read Order]")